Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 28/10/2007, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can provide 2 defaults for new projects: Debug and Release, but
even those should be editable so projects don't need dead modes
which are just there by IDE idiosincrasy
I gave some thougth to it,
Since the rev 1259x I have the following issue :
Gtk2_ItemSelectionChanged ItemChache=nil
Gtk2_ItemSelectionChanged ItemChache=nil
Gtk2_ItemSelectionChanged ItemChache=nil
SetViewStyle
Gtk2_ItemSelectionChanged ItemChache=nil
Gtk2_ItemSelectionChanged ItemChache=nil
Milipili Houbi пишет:
[skip]
There is no problem with the Rev 12586.
Have you got any idea what the problem is ?
Do you have small test application?
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Milipili Houbi wrote:
Since the rev 1259x I have the following issue :
[snip]
(pixie:16871): Gdk-WARNING **:
/build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.12.0/gdk/gdkpixbuf-drawable.c:1255: Depth of the
source drawable is 1 where as the visual depth of the colormap passed is 24
(pixie:16871):
On Oct 29, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Milipili Houbi пишет:
[skip]
There is no problem with the Rev 12586.
Have you got any idea what the problem is ?
Do you have small test application?
The app is a closed source one I am sorry but I will tru to reproduce
the error with
Andrea Mauri schreef:
Dear All,
I just installed fpc (2.2) and lazarus (svn) on an Ubuntu linux machine
(i386).
I added to the uses clause libc but when I try to compile it I got the
error message libc not found.
Libc is in the fpc source directory in:
/rtl/netwlibc/
This one is for
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:19:25 +0100
Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrea Mauri schreef:
Dear All,
I just installed fpc (2.2) and lazarus (svn) on an Ubuntu linux
machine (i386).
I added to the uses clause libc but when I try to compile it I got
the error message libc not
On 29/10/2007, Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guadagnini David wrote:
In attach You can found the first version of the control TMaskEdit.
For make it I used the delphi 5 source code.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE
Don't use copyrighted material when submitting code.
At least this time
Hi,
oh dear, after fixing the first unresolved symbols, OS 10.3 reveals
a lot more. I suppose we can forget 10.3 for the Carbon widgetset?
Cheers,
Tobias
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
On Oct 29, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Marc Weustink wrote:
Milipili Houbi wrote:
Since the rev 1259x I have the following issue :
[snip]
(pixie:16871): Gdk-WARNING **: /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.12.0/gdk/
gdkpixbuf-drawable.c:1255: Depth of the source drawable is 1 where
as the visual depth of
Hello,
I just succeeded in my first cross-compiling and I am now trying my app
on a G3 Mac. The Carbon widgetset is used. The following symbols are
not available on 10.3:
kUTType* (used by CarbonClipboard)
kCGColorSpaceGenericRGB (used by CarbonProc)
kCGColorSpaceGenericGray
I'm now trying
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:09:05 +0100
Andrea Mauri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
I just installed fpc (2.2) and lazarus (svn) on an Ubuntu linux
machine (i386).
I added to the uses clause libc but when I try to compile it I got
the error message libc not found.
Libc is in the fpc source
Dear All,
I just installed fpc (2.2) and lazarus (svn) on an Ubuntu linux machine
(i386).
I added to the uses clause libc but when I try to compile it I got the
error message libc not found.
Libc is in the fpc source directory in:
/rtl/netwlibc/
and in
/packages/base/libc/
But also manually
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:37:15 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lazarus@miraclec.com Subject: [lazarus] Missing symbols in Mac OS 10.3
Hello,
I just succeeded in my first cross-compiling and I am now trying my app
on a G3 Mac. The Carbon
Tobias Giesen wrote:
Hello,
I just succeeded in my first cross-compiling and I am now trying my app
on a G3 Mac. The Carbon widgetset is used. The following symbols are
not available on 10.3:
kUTType* (used by CarbonClipboard)
kCGColorSpaceGenericRGB (used by CarbonProc)
Hi all,
What is the correct way to use an *.framework within a Lazarus project?
I can get SDL.framework working with XCode, but don't know where put
the -kSDL line to get it to pull in the framework.
Thanks,
Dominique.
_
I tried the -vt option, looking at the messages I found that all the
units are searched in
/usr/lib/fpc/2.2.0/ and subdirectory but never in the fpc source
directory I have set in the lazarus environment options that is
(/home/myhome/programmi/lazarus/fpcsrc/fpc-2.2.0/)
Lazarus is able to find
Andrea Mauri schreef:
I tried the -vt option, looking at the messages I found that all the
units are searched in
/usr/lib/fpc/2.2.0/ and subdirectory but never in the fpc source
directory I have set in the lazarus environment options that is
(/home/myhome/programmi/lazarus/fpcsrc/fpc-2.2.0/)
shit. I missed it. Thank you.
Vincent Snijders ha scritto:
Andrea Mauri schreef:
I tried the -vt option, looking at the messages I found that all the
units are searched in
/usr/lib/fpc/2.2.0/ and subdirectory but never in the fpc source
directory I have set in the lazarus environment options
Hello,
I haven't worked on the i18n stuff lately (not even on lazarus). Could
you please create a bug report with a test case.
The .po file should have all the strings with are TTranslateString maybe
on the components you're using the properties aren't correctly setup.
The .rst should still be
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 14:07 +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:48:18 +0200
Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:30:21 +0100
Luis Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 01:03 +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 15
2007/10/29, Luis Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I haven't worked on the i18n stuff lately (not even on lazarus). Could
you please create a bug report with a test case.
The .po file should have all the strings with are TTranslateString maybe
on the components you're using the
Dear all,
if I build a simple console application, just created by lazarus and I
run it using the -help option I get this error:
project1 -help
exception at :
Invalid option at position 1: e.
Both in windows and linux. The result is given by:
ErrorMsg:=CheckOptions('h','help');
While
2007/10/29, wile64 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/10/29, Luis Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I haven't worked on the i18n stuff lately (not even on lazarus). Could
you please create a bug report with a test case.
The .po file should have all the strings with are TTranslateString
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 17:10 +0100, wile64 wrote:
2007/10/29, Luis Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I haven't worked on the i18n stuff lately (not even on
lazarus). Could
you please create a bug report with a test case.
The
In order to test cross-platform compatibility of Lazarus applications,
it would be very nice to use VmWare, instead of rebooting in a Windows
partition.
But I usually get PC's with Windows preinstalled, and using the recovery
CD's supplied the installation in VmWare fails, because the installer
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:41:26 +
Luis Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 14:07 +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:48:18 +0200
Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:30:21 +0100
Luis Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Anybody know if we may use the following units or are they copy
protected by Borland as well?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ pwd
/mnt/windows/Program Files/Borland/Delphi7/Source/Samples
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ ls -l
total 104
-r-xr-x--- 1 root plugdev 8605 2002-08-20 18:40 Calendar.pas
-r-xr-x--- 1 root
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Anybody know if we may use the following units or are they copy
protected by Borland as well?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ pwd
/mnt/windows/Program Files/Borland/Delphi7/Source/Samples
[snip]
My first thought would be that they are copy protected by Borland, but
they
On 29/10/2007, Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first thought would be that they are copy protected by Borland, but
they don't seem to have the usual copy protection header in the units.
So could they be public domain?
I don't know, I treat them as they are.
Better ask Borland.
Giuliano Colla wrote:
I hate to buy a *second* licence, just to run Windows in a Pc, for which
I've already bought one, when my opinion about MS is that they should
pay me in order to make me use their crappy software.
The problem with Microsoft Windows OEM licenses is that they are for a
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
First you can try
$ export LCL_PLATFORM=gtk2; make clean all idepkg
This will rebuild the whole gtk2 IDE with packages.
If this gives the same error, then you have some old ppu files. You can
see all files found by the compiler with:
I added a warning to the
Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto:
On 29/10/2007, Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first thought would be that they are copy protected by Borland, but
they don't seem to have the usual copy protection header in the units.
So could they be public domain?
I don't know, I treat them
Micha Nelissen ha scritto:
Giuliano Colla wrote:
I hate to buy a *second* licence, just to run Windows in a Pc, for which
I've already bought one, when my opinion about MS is that they should
pay me in order to make me use their crappy software.
The problem with Microsoft Windows OEM
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I'll try and find a support email for CodeGear and see
what they say.
Try borland.public.delphi.non-technical at newsgroups.borland.com.
--
Joao Morais
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
35 matches
Mail list logo
