Re: [lazarus] Pascal and CGI-bin

2006-01-03 Thread L505
I think div has nothing to do with slowness, it's just parsing which can be done quickly. Furthermore using tables for site's layout is just *ugly*. Use div with CSS, and it will solve your color problem at the same time. (User can choose other CSS file). Micha Uhmmm...? Tables do CSS

Re: [lazarus] Pascal and CGI-bin

2006-01-03 Thread L505
it's not time to make a decision yet being in this one minded view. I can visualize a table easy - can I visualize a Div? I hope so, if there are bandwidth savings. -- L505 _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [lazarus] Pascal and CGI-bin

2006-01-02 Thread L505
Is there anything in the pipeline where applications written in lazarus can be compiled for a browser GUI? Meaning that the gui will appear within a browser and therefore web accessible? (compiled for a browser GUI = browser plugin? appear within a browser = be built into the

Re: [lazarus] Pascal and CGI-bin

2006-01-02 Thread L505
[...] I actually agree with fast prototyping, such as visual development sometimes - but HTML isn't capable enough and not suited for the pixel based form style development. It is not suited for that by design, yes. It isn't capable for pixel-based *. enough would imply that it was

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2005-12-30 Thread L505
I have made an example for md5 hash http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=MD5Hash-Example _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2005-12-29 Thread L505
library mydll; function MakeMD5Hash(aValue: pchar): pchar; stdcall; Pchars are not usually returned as a result, but rather passed as a parameter _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as

[lazarus] TSynUniSyn

2005-12-27 Thread L505
Does TSynUniSyn work correctly with case insensitive languages, like the Pascal highlighter? It seems to make the Synedit text all CAPS LOCK when I try it On case sensitive languages such as Turbo C++ it appears to work. _ To

Re: [lazarus] Re: Menu icons in KDE / Gnome

2005-09-07 Thread L505
I myself dont use desktop icons but I can relate why they might me nice... (like immediately being visible after logging in, freely positionable) if I had a larger screen, they might be actually useful, but as-is, they are _always_ covered by about = 5 full screen windows, so I wouldnt see

Re: Eclipse

2005-09-05 Thread L505
Old topic I'm replying to. Just catching up on my email. This is already possible? See http://www.freepascal.org/docs.html the with comments part. Interesting, is there some sort of comment system on the unit references though, like for example the ones created with FPDOC. Those are

Re: Eclipse

2005-09-05 Thread L505
IDE For non-GUI devel -- If you ripped out all the visual components in Lazarus it would still be a good IDE. Lazarus needs to be marketed then, not just for creating visual GUI applications.. but for custom programs too. Eclipse seems to be known by some as

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread L505
Just some thoughts: Someone could create a TReader/TWriter which writes pascal include files instead of lfm. I think that's what I was trying to get at too, but didn't know how to put it in words. How does delphi do it I wonder?? Is there some open tools api thing that Vladimir is using in

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread L505
An excellent area open to be researched by someone, hint ;-) Micha First I have to learn C and then I have to commit suicide. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject

Re: [lazarus] Console GUI / Web Applications Support for Lazarus RAD

2005-09-03 Thread L505
Intraweb gives you visual HTML development. It's very powerful. Michael. Wow! I didn't know this, have to check into it. I thought it was just components that you drop on a form or something, similar to indy components, which aren't actually visible to the Eye on runtime

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread L505
The linker used is the cygwin version, maybe using the MingW one could improve performance since the later doesn't emulate the posix enviroment luiz Anyone else have any comments? Shall we do some benchmarks to compare the speed gains possible? And is it even possible, to use MingW? I

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread L505
The linker used is the cygwin version, maybe using the MingW one could improve performance since the later doesn't emulate the posix enviroment luiz Anyone else have any comments? Shall we do some benchmarks to compare the speed gains possible? And is it even possible, to use

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-03 Thread L505
I figure a simple chronograph test could help decide if its 5 times faster, 1 time faster, 1/2 faster, etc. - Benchmark505 - Linking time until XX lines compiled XX seconds message Conditions: Empty lazarus form1 style project.

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-02 Thread L505
Shall I give you the mail address of the Remobjects company ? Try to get support for D5, or if you feel lucky, D3 :-) Well PascalScript that I have downoaded (possibly an older version) does work with D5, but I guess you are talking about other components they have. Which ones do you use

Re: [lazarus] OT: Did any onw saw Delphi 2005?

2005-09-02 Thread L505
Some things are simply too big to do yourself. For example, a stable RPC mechanism. Yeah, I like the fact that some stuff like synapse, KOL, etc. were already written by someone else. Hey at least those two support Delphi5 ;)

Re: [lazarus] Bugs ? Startlazarus increases link times

2005-08-30 Thread L505
Tested linking times (not including compiling time) Lazarus: - lazarus.new.exe 2 minutes : 37 seconds StartLazarus - lazarus.new.exe 2 minutes : 54 seconds Celeron 400mhz, 327MB RAM, Windows 2000 Lazarus Version: 0.9.7 RB Alpha LD.exe version: not sure, it is

Re: [lazarus] making WIN32 DLL ?

2005-08-30 Thread L505
It whould be, but I think not a lot of people have tried to do this yet. (Me neither, btw). What commandline options does FP hand to fpc to compile it, and what is the difference to the commandline lazarus generates ? fp has a compiled in compiler. I noticed this, because whenever I

Re: [lazarus] making WIN32 DLL ?

2005-08-30 Thread L505
They can. Only real DOS apps cannot. On windows a console app can be a real Win32 app, and can hence load libraries. Dos apps running in a Command-line windows usually cannot load libraries. Michael. thx. And I just assume linux/unix has had DSO's for a long long time in command line

Re: [lazarus] Bugs ? Startlazarus increases link times

2005-08-29 Thread L505
Tests done on blank project1 Compiling and Linking is included in the times. First Round: - Startlazarus.exe: 56 seconds (blank project) Lazarus.exe 36 seconds (blank project) Second round (IDE closed, then re-opened completely) Startlazarus.exe: 31

Re: [lazarus] Why Lazarus and not Python or Ruby

2005-08-25 Thread L505
I don't use python/perl/php/ruby, only shellscript (handful lines only) and make, and FPC. I don't either but so much KDE stuff relies on them - it makes me feel like linux is just wrong - since everyone is using it, hence our need for a Pascal based linux distro (pipe dreams). You

Re: Eclipse

2005-08-15 Thread L505
Lazarus and Eclipse are compared as two IDEs, and why the most bloated one seem to be the most successful too. In my view, this is due to a lack of marketing effort from the freepascal and lazarus project, and the old school image associated with Pascal in general. This is surely not helped by

Re: Eclipse lazarus and marketing

2005-08-15 Thread L505
Hi, this week-end, I have been browsing at my local book store: -- hundreds of book about Java, php, html, C++, etc... Many many more books than actual programers! -- five books about eclipse. -- one or two old books about Delphi, -- NO books about lazarus. I do not

Re: [lazarus] Eclipse

2005-08-15 Thread L505
| While I agree with most your statements, I do think you unnecessarily | limit yourself, because: | | Applications *can* be based around TForm in Lazarus (or Delphi). We have a 3-tier application with | 600+ forms, all of them descendents from a self-written TCustomForm descendent. And luckily

Re: [lazarus] Eclipse

2005-08-15 Thread L505
| While I agree with most your statements, I do think you unnecessarily | limit yourself, because: | | Applications *can* be based around TForm in Lazarus (or Delphi). We have a 3-tier application with | 600+ forms, all of them descendents from a self-written TCustomForm descendent. And luckily |

Re: Eclipse

2005-08-15 Thread L505
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Lazarus_Projects#Seksi_Comm ander Vincent. Ahhh thanks - will bookmark it and add some incoming links to it. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: [lazarus] Eclipse

2005-08-06 Thread L505
| I downloaded to look at it. It is a nice IDE for developpement... | mainly Java. But it is not surpassing in any way delphi IDE (at the | moment... al least, and this is my opinion only.) It is slow, it is | java. | | But maybe for java this was a great step forward. I can't compare with |

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus RB Edition w/Plugger

2005-08-03 Thread L505
| Where can I download the (changes in the) lazarus source code? | | Vincent. Well, first let me know what you think of the plugins before calling the GNU cops ;-) I haven't finished figuring out how to distribute the code, I could do a bunch of DIFF patches or just make you download 24MB or so

Re: [lazarus] several diffs

2005-08-01 Thread L505
| Besides when you want to do more sophisticated work then you can alway's | switch back to the console. Otherwise whats the use of the current diff tool | in lazarus??? What/where is the current tool in laz? _ To

<    1   2