Re: [OT] Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-10 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, Am Montag, den 10.04.2006, 10:01 +0200 schrieb Micha Nelissen: > Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > >> I'm not familiar with the process. I know you can make hydrogen from > >> water, by > >> dissecting water into pieces through electrolysis. > > > > Yeah, that method sucks :) > > > > I'd use ht

Re: [OT] Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-10 Thread Giuliano Colla
L505 ha scritto: [...] In brazil they already use sugar as their source of fuel. There is already infrastructure for sugar/alcohol powered cars. Brazil uses them. The oil companies don't want this. Anyone think an oil company wants to go out of business and buy all the technology from Brazil? M

Re: [OT] Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-10 Thread Micha Nelissen
Danny Milosavljevic wrote: I'm not familiar with the process. I know you can make hydrogen from water, by dissecting water into pieces through electrolysis. Yeah, that method sucks :) I'd use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process since there it's a "leftover" resulting H component anyway

Re: [OT] Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-09 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 09.04.2006, 14:17 -0600 schrieb L505: > > > > > "There is no excuse for Oil being a raw material needed to ship food" > > > > > > No, there isn't. Which is why those who can are switching to gas (which, > > > lo and behold, farmers can produce that themselves) and hydrogen and

Re: [OT] Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-09 Thread L505
> > > "There is no excuse for Oil being a raw material needed to ship food" > > > > No, there isn't. Which is why those who can are switching to gas (which, > > lo and behold, farmers can produce that themselves) and hydrogen and > > trains anyways. The only "problem" is the lag of the infrastructu

Re: [OT] Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-09 Thread L505
> "There is no excuse for Oil being a raw material needed to ship food" > > No, there isn't. Which is why those who can are switching to gas (which, > lo and behold, farmers can produce that themselves) and hydrogen and > trains anyways. The only "problem" is the lag of the infrastructure, > that

[OT] Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, Am Freitag, den 07.04.2006, 18:45 -0600 schrieb L505: > > Thank you, but I appreciate the freedom and the power of open source ;-) > > Also, I can't see anything wrong in spending US$10 on something > > minimally important, why is it? > > No problem at all - I would spend $10-$20 on a "I Love