On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the line of WinCE it would then be Win or Win3264 or win32_64
Yes, but we could also think that wince is actually called winceapi,
only shortened =)
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Marc Weustink schreef:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:19:39 -0400
Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the
files: winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
---Original Message-
From: Vincent Snijders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 5:27 AM
To: lazarus mailinglist
Subject: [lazarus] New name for the win32 widget set?
Hi,
The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
windows
versions, starting from
Marc Weustink schreef:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:19:39 -0400
Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the
files: winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
It's the right name. The
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:19:39 -0400
Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the
files: winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
It's the right name. They map LCL winapi like ca
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:19:39 -0400
Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> > If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the
> > files: winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
It's the right name. They map LCL winapi like calls to the winapi.
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the files:
> winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
>
Still winapi seems most appropriate.
mswindows?
Andrew
_
To unsubscribe: m
I also think winapi best describes what it is.
Paul
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 4:00 pm, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> On 18/04/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would vote for gdi or winapi
>
> i'd vote for winapi, since the gdi is not the widget set and lazarus
> does
If the name is winapi, it will be a little strange to have the files:
winapiwinapi.inc and winapiwinapih.inc
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subjec
Just opened my platform sdk and looked at list of technologies. We are
using at least: common controls, gdi, shell (maybe smth other). So GDI
cant describe all win32 widgetset. For me win32_64 is better.
Paul.
_
To unsubscribe
Damn incorrect Reply-To headers.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Apr 18, 2007 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] New name for the win32 widget set?
To: Sergei Gorelkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 4/18/07, Sergei Gorelkin <[
On 18/04/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would vote for gdi or winapi
i'd vote for winapi, since the gdi is not the widget set and lazarus
doesn't call it directly (?).
henry
_
To unsubscribe: ma
Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 6:05:19 PM, Graeme wrote:
GG> On 4/18/07, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is it really gdi only? I guess you use at least gdi+
>> GDI sounds also some old fashined to me.
>>
GG> I'm no low level Windows expert, but isn't GDI+ only Win2000 (or was
GG> t
Marc Weustink schrieb:
>>> If we don't use GDI, we need another widgetset anyhow, so win would not
>>> fit there.
>>
>> Is it really gdi only? I guess you use at least gdi+
>
> IIRC lazarus doens't use gdi+ api calls.
Still, I think wingdi sounds old fashioned ;)
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Marc Weustink schrieb:
Sam Liddicott wrote:
* Graeme Geldenhuys wrote, On 18/04/07 11:15:
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or maybe WinGDI ?
Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better
I would vote for gdi or winapi
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
> windows versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP
> 64, Vista 64 bits.
>
> Because Microsoft has done such a good job with the 64 port of the 32
> bit winapi to 64 bits and
On 4/18/07, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it really gdi only? I guess you use at least gdi+
GDI sounds also some old fashined to me.
I'm no low level Windows expert, but isn't GDI+ only Win2000 (or was
that WinXP) and later? Also I thought GDI+ was just a few extensions
(ext
Marc Weustink schrieb:
> Sam Liddicott wrote:
>> * Graeme Geldenhuys wrote, On 18/04/07 11:15:
>>> On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> Or maybe WinGDI ?
>
> Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
>>> I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even
Tiziano_mk wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
The only one I can think of is just "win", but that might be a bit short.
winX ?
It is no X
Marc
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" a
Sam Liddicott wrote:
* Graeme Geldenhuys wrote, On 18/04/07 11:15:
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or maybe WinGDI ?
Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better might be 'GDI' on
it's own. I don't know of any
* Graeme Geldenhuys wrote, On 18/04/07 11:15:
> On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Or maybe WinGDI ?
>> >
>> > Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
>>
>> Good one
>
> I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better might be 'GDI' on
> it's own. I don't know of a
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or maybe WinGDI ?
>
> Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better might be 'GDI' on
it's own. I don't know of any other platform that has a GDI libr
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
The only one I can think of is just "win", but that might be a bit short.
winX ?
rgds
tiziano
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives
On 4/18/07, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or maybe WinGDI ?
>
> Because it uses the GDI library widgets...
Good one
I agree, this one makes the most sense. Even better might be 'GDI' on
it's own. I don't know of any other platform that has a GDI library
other than Windows. Als
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Hi,
The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
windows versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP 64,
Vista 64 bits.
Because Microsoft has done suc
Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 1:26:42 PM, Vincent wrote:
VS> The only one I can think of is just "win", but that might be a bit short.
'win' is not shorter than 'gtk', and even 33% longer than 'qt' :-)
Maybe 'mswin'? Or 'msw', like wxWidgets abbreviate Windows stuff.
--
Best regards,
Sergei
___
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Vincent Snijders schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
> > windows versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP 64,
> > Vista 64 bits.
> >
> > Because Microsoft has done suc
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several
> windows versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP 64,
> Vista 64 bits.
>
> Because Microsoft has done such a good job with the 64 port of the 32
> bit winapi to 64 bits
Hi,
The win32 widgetset can be used (with more or less success) on several windows
versions, starting from windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP, XP 64, Vista 64 bits.
Because Microsoft has done such a good job with the 64 port of the 32 bit winapi to
64 bits and the fpc windows unit abstracts rem
30 matches
Mail list logo
