On Sat, 20 May 2006, L505 wrote:
> > I come with a different point of view to Lazarus. I want to build projects
> > that first feed my family and second please my sense of right.
>
> All of us who think this way should start a group/joint endeavor together
> because I am
> voting for the sam
> I come with a different point of view to Lazarus. I want to build projects
> that first feed my family and second please my sense of right.
All of us who think this way should start a group/joint endeavor together
because I am
voting for the same thing, and I'm sick of all the folks out there
On Saturday 20 May 2006 05:46, Zlatko Matić wrote:
> Activities around making free open-source alternative to MS .NET (Mono,
> dotGNU) and Visual Studio .NET (MonoDevelop,SharpDevelop) are very
> intensive and rapidly aproaches to the final goal.
> With recent incuding of Stetic, It is easy to fors
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
2006/5/20, Zlatko Matić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Activities around making free open-source alternative to MS .NET (Mono,
dotGNU) and Visual Studio .NET (MonoDevelop,SharpDevelop) are very
intensive
and rapidly aproaches to the final goal.
With recent incuding of Stetic, I
2006/5/20, Zlatko Matić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Activities around making free open-source alternative to MS .NET (Mono,
dotGNU) and Visual Studio .NET (MonoDevelop,SharpDevelop) are very intensive
and rapidly aproaches to the final goal.
With recent incuding of Stetic, It is easy to forseen that Mon
Activities around making free open-source alternative to MS .NET (Mono,
dotGNU) and Visual Studio .NET (MonoDevelop,SharpDevelop) are very intensive
and rapidly aproaches to the final goal.
With recent incuding of Stetic, It is easy to forseen that MonoDevelop will
soon become visual RAD tool co
