Re: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 12:01:29AM -0600, Justin R Findlay wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:55:13PM -0600, Dan Hanks wrote: Perhaps we in the community just need to organize an un-conference the day before. Gather together a bunch of geeks interested in genealogy for a bunch of hours

Re: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-07 Thread Dan Hanks
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Justin R Findlay wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:55:13PM -0600, Dan Hanks wrote: Perhaps we in the community just need to organize an un-conference the day before. Gather together a bunch of geeks interested in genealogy for a bunch of hours with free wireless and see

Re: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-06 Thread Carl Youngblood
My take on the wiki and mailing list responses is not that they are difficult to do, but that many of us would see an officially-sanctioned sourceforge-like area as a stamp of approval on what might otherwise be construed as an ark-steadying activity. Indeed, I know of no other forum than the

RE: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-06 Thread Dan Hanks
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Dallan Quass wrote: Overall it's a good workshop. A few people come in from out of town, but I estimate that 80-90% of the attendees this year came from BYU, the Church, or Ancestry. I think it would be _much_ better if there were an effort driving people to work together

RE: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-06 Thread Dallan Quass
I agree with Dan. One of the best things that could happen at the Family History Workshop or a Church-sponsored open-source conference would be to set time aside for birds-of-a-feather sessions, where people interested in the same area could get to know each other, share ideas, make plans to work

RE: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-05 Thread Dallan Quass
already doing). -dallan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven H. McCown Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:26 AM To: 'LDS Open Source Software' Subject: RE: [Ldsoss] Survey Results BYU sponsors a Family History Technology Workshop. Does

Re: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-04 Thread Jon D.
--- Alan Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea how this will go over, or how it might be done, or even if it'll be allowed by the secular conferences, but why not co-sponsor existing conferences. Doesn't Novell host a Linux conference in SLC? I think Linus showed up there a couple

Re: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-03 Thread Paul Penrod
Pat, Desiring development conferences should not be a surprise. In the private sector, that is a major source of revenue to the people that put them on and a major social event for those in their respective discipline. I don't personally find them all that educational for the money spent, but

Re: [Ldsoss] Survey Results

2006-07-03 Thread Alan Young
I have no idea how this will go over, or how it might be done, or even if it'll be allowed by the secular conferences, but why not co-sponsor existing conferences. How many LDS are going to OSCon? YAPC? ApacheCon? The SAGE stuff? Rather than try to start up yet another conference, leverage