At 08:54 PM 11/22/00 +0100, Eric Wolzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello Leaf-developers
>
>I want to offer help in writing documentation.
>As i am not that good at programming. I am relativ new to LRP
>(Leaf) 4 Month now, but reading a lot. This could be a good thing
>too, because i might see pr
Eric Wolzak wrote:
> Hello Leaf-developers
>
> I want to offer help in writing documentation.
> As i am not that good at programming. I am relativ new to LRP
> (Leaf) 4 Month now, but reading a lot. This could be a good thing
> too, because i might see problems for newbies that a guru could
> ove
Hello Leaf-developers
I want to offer help in writing documentation.
As i am not that good at programming. I am relativ new to LRP
(Leaf) 4 Month now, but reading a lot. This could be a good thing
too, because i might see problems for newbies that a guru could
oversee ;)
I thought perhaps
At 10:49 AM 11/22/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 01:21 PM 11/22/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
> >Mike Sensney wrote:
> >> I was thinking that it would be a good idea to invite Matthew in
> >> as a LEAF developer. He developed the mountain series. I
> >> personally would lik
At 01:21 PM 11/22/00 -0500, Rick Onanian wrote:
>Mike Sensney wrote:
>> I was thinking that it would be a good idea to invite Matthew in as a LEAF
>> developer. He developed the mountain series. I personally would like to see
>> him continue his development work if he is willing.
>
>
>What gives y
Does anybody here feel up to the task of getting a Linux 2.4
version going?
If we can build a Linux 2.4 firewall on a floppy, we will be
in ship shape. Doing so would greatly distinguish us from our
LRP roots, while furthering it's efforts greatly also.
A Linux 2.4 LEAF firewall-on-a-floppy wou
Mike Sensney wrote:
> I was thinking that it would be a good idea to invite Matthew in as a LEAF
> developer. He developed the mountain series. I personally would like to see
> him continue his development work if he is willing.
What gives you the idea that he would be willing? He wasn't
willing
I was thinking that it would be a good idea to invite Matthew in as a LEAF
developer. He developed the mountain series. I personally would like to see
him continue his development work if he is willing.
At 10:13 AM 11/22/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > >but I have no idea what to put for content - the content
> > >you've got at your example site looks about perfect, and
> > >is formatted about perfectly too...so how do I compete?
> > >Change the background
Mike Noyes wrote:
> >but I have no idea what to put for content - the content
> >you've got at your example site looks about perfect, and
> >is formatted about perfectly too...so how do I compete?
> >Change the background color and logo that's used? ;)
>
> I thought we were looking at design conc
At 09:41 AM 11/22/00 -0500, Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > At 08:45 AM 11/21/00 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > We now have a very simple home page available. Should I separate
> > the logo submissions by author?
>
>You already did. Looks good.
Mike Noyes wrote:
> At 08:45 AM 11/21/00 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We now have a very simple home page available. Should I separate the logo
> submissions by author?
You already did. Looks good.
I'm going to attempt to create at
http://www.c0wz.com/leaf/
but I have no idea
At 08:45 AM 11/21/00 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If there are no objections, I'll publish an "under construction" page with
>links to the logo and web page entries today.
We now have a very simple home page available. Should I separate the logo
submissions by author?
http://
13 matches
Mail list logo
