On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
Goerge:
Got it from Tom on the LRP list, thanks.
One of those days when amost everything I said
out loud was dead wrong. :) But then, if this is what
it takes to get a no-hitter outta my Red Sox, I can
get used to it...
Yeah, that was
Hello David.
I'd like to see if any of you could test drive the upcoming Oxygen
release.
I would like to test it, where can I get it.
After an initial foray and some fudging, it would seem that glibc 2.1
is the way to go. I've converted Oxygen to run with glibc 2.1, and it
seems to work
Steven Peck, 2001-04-04 23:09 -0700
George,
try the rute tutorial at rute.sourceforge.net
The license is very restrictive, but it's got a good tutorial on linux and a
bit of shell scripting for free
Steven,
How about these two?
developerWorks: Linux: Articles
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:06:00AM -0400, George Metz scribbled:
One of these days, I WILL learn shell scripting and C...
Aw, who'm I kidding? =)
Shell scripting is easy. It all makes sense. You won't learn it,
of course, until you have some need to fill, though.
I've learned a lot about
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:51:15AM -0700, Mike Noyes scribbled:
Rick George,
I plan on purchasing these two books, unless someone has a better idea. I
have KR's C book, but haven't read it yet.
That's supposed to be _the_ book to read. :)
Beginning Linux Programming
ISBN: 1861002971
C
-Original Message-
From: George Metz
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Steven Peck wrote:
George,
try the rute tutorial at rute.sourceforge.net
The license is very restrictive, but it's got a good tutorial on linux
and a
bit of shell scripting for free
Just started reading it a little just
Oops,
I just subscibed to this list and therefore missed the post about the
upcoming glibc-2.1 based Oxygen release. I must look like a fool. Of
course I will give that release a try. If I can find some time tomorrow
I think I'll make a kernel using Charles' patches and an iptables.lrp
amusing product
http://www.boat.be/
read a little about FireWare and you'll understand why I say amusing, though
I do like 1U rackmounts ;-)
Does anyone know off hand how many LRP based consumer devices exist?
-Kenneth Hadley
___
Leaf-devel mailing
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:21:03AM -0700, Kenneth Hadley scribbled:
amusing product
http://www.boat.be/
read a little about FireWare and you'll understand why I say amusing, though
I do like 1U rackmounts ;-)
Does anyone know off hand how many LRP based consumer devices exist?
Is it time
Mike Noyes wrote:
Very good news! Does this mean that Debian 2.1 is no longer necessary to
build packages for Oxygen?
Yes, it does!
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People who are good at C say that C is easy. Every time I attempt
to learn C, I fail miserably...
Sounds like what happens to me every time I try to learn LISP or
Smalltalk.
The thing I always find fascinating is the textbooks show you how to
add 5 and 6, but not
To me, that is what LRP and its variants are all about: these ARE
distributions, and part of maintaining a distribution is updating
packages, adding features, recompiles, et al.
As for a LEAF distribution, I think I would actually shy away from an
actual "LEAF" image; the concept is good but the
I seem to be somewhat alone in that I *LIKE* the *.lrp packaging;
there is only one change I would make: rename the files from *.lrp to
*.tgz. This adds the ability to know what the file format is, and
allows Windows hosts to decipher the file automatically.
However, there is support for
Kenneth Hadley wrote:
amusing product
http://www.boat.be/
read a little about FireWare and you'll understand why I say amusing, though
I do like 1U rackmounts ;-)
Thanks for plugging my product ;-)
Does anyone know off hand how many LRP based consumer devices exist?
My guess is that
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:58:05PM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
The thing I always find fascinating is the textbooks show you how to
add 5 and 6, but not how to scan a configuration file; or they show
you how to do a bubble sort, but not how to react to user input. It
seems as if general
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:45:59PM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
As for a LEAF distribution, I think I would actually shy away from an
actual "LEAF" image; the concept is good but the literal
implementation would be bad. Put another way, I wouldn't have any
problem with "Maple LRP"
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:51:59PM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
I seem to be somewhat alone in that I *LIKE* the *.lrp packaging;
there is only one change I would make: rename the files from *.lrp to
*.tgz. This adds the ability to know what the file format is, and
allows Windows hosts
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 12:04:38AM +0200, Robert Sprockeels scribbled:
http://www.boat.be/
Thanks for plugging my product ;-)
BTW, it's listed in lrp.c0wz.com now.
--
rick -- A mind is like a parachute... it only works when it's open.
ICQ# 1590117 [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Sprockeels" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Kenneth Hadley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "LEAF-list" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "LRP-List"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:04 PM
Subject: [Leaf-devel] Re: [LRP] Interesting LRP consumer device
Kenneth
Kenneth Hadley wrote:
Actually, I guess what they _really_ sell is their Linux know-how and
their LRP
experience... because they like it, and they know it really WORKS!
Robert
Extremely true, even I support few LRP boxes for profit.
Though I am extremely curious about where you got
David:
I agree, there should be no distribution called LEAF,
specifically. But...there *should* be distributions called
(for instance) Maple and Oxygen that were developed by LEAF
contributors.
Essentially, we should distinguish the project name
from the distribution name. So,
Actually I like .lrp as well, though my complaint
with it is different. I find it difficult to extract files
from a .lrp without potentially overwriting important system
binaries on the development box.
What'd be *much* nicer is if package.lrp expanded
to /tmp/package, and then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:51:59PM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
I seem to be somewhat alone in that I *LIKE* the *.lrp packaging;
there is only one change I would make: rename the files from *.lrp to
*.tgz. This adds the ability to know what the file format
Howdy,
I've been upgrading to 2.9.8/2.0.36, and I finally decided to try out
Matthew Schalit's rc.pf script. I'd like to present to the developers
what I worked out before I post the linuxrouter.org, to flush out any
errors. I decided to figure out how to allow for dhcp, rc.pf and
Everyone,
The Midori Linux project wants someone to build a router based on Midori.
http://midori.transmeta.com/projects.shtml
If you know of someone working on one of the ideas listed here, (let us
know on the midori-discuss mailing list and we'll update our references.
A Router Based
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
Actually I like .lrp as well, though my complaint
with it is different. I find it difficult to extract files
from a .lrp without potentially overwriting important system
binaries on the development box.
I don't grok this. I have never had
You know, Dave C is always looking for sponsers. He does seem to mention
them on the LRP webpage, one of the few things that is updated regularly.
--
Steven Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacramento, CA http://leaf.blkmtn.org
Jeff:
Sorry you don't agree. What I mean to say was, suppose
my currently running system has a working /etc/dnscache (for
example). I'd be ill advised to extract a new dnscache.lrp without
carefully controlling where it untar's. The defaults would overwrite
what's my system was using.
Jon:
Heya. Two very keen improvements; good show. I might
lift them in an update to echowall...
Thanks!
-Scott
...
Since dhclient-script is called when the IP address changes, it seems a
natural place to call rc.pf. So, in the BOUND and TIMEOUT sections,
right after the gateway
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Robert Sprockeels wrote:
I must admit they were not easy to find at all - or rather: it was not easy to
find a supplier in Belgium, since I didn't want to import them myself... I
found my supplier in Antwerp, and he imports... from Taiwan, of course!
Oh, of course. Where
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
Actually I like .lrp as well, though my complaint
with it is different. I find it difficult to extract files
from a .lrp without potentially overwriting important system
binaries on the development box.
Erm...
I've never had a problem with
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, S.C.Best wrote:
Jeff:
Sorry you don't agree.
Well, I am too. I feel like one of us is operating under some
misconceptions about how lrpkg or tar works. By continuing this thread, I
hope to grok your concern, or perhaps you will find your concerns were not
32 matches
Mail list logo
