Please check:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/article.php?sid=47
for the details
Those updated packages are untested. Please report success/problems.
Jacques
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http
>
> > But when webadmin is upgraded, a license may change.
>
> I'm sorry to hear this, but those that write the code usually get to
> choose the license.
Don't worry. It is a far future.
>
> > # I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc
> code of Bering.
>
> Great. Is ther
I managed to build an (allmost) complete version of Bering RC3 against
uClibc 0.9.12. This version is *a lot* smaller than the original version
build against GLIBC2. I tested the following modules: weblet, root,
initrd, dhcpd, pump, ezipupd, dnscache... I don't use pppd, so I couldn't
test it but
In my experience you have to be careful with uClibc.. I also tried migrating to
it and while the binaries seemed to run, I got various glitches and strange
behavior.
BTW, WISP-Dist's initrd is based on busybox/ash/sed compiled against uClibc.
E.Spakman wrote:
> I managed to build an (allmost)
Hello,
I managed to build an (allmost) complete version of Bering RC3 against
uClibc 0.9.12. This version is *a lot* smaller than the original versionbuild
against GLIBC2. I tested the following modules: weblet, root, initrd, dhcpd,
pump, ezipupd, dnscache... I don't use pppd, so I couldn't te
I agree, but it runs for a few days now and I don't have any problems with it. All
binaries work and I
didn't see any glitches or strange behavior. The version of uClibc I used is the
latest stable one.
I will look at WISP, thanks for pointing me to that.
Eric Spakman
Vladimir I. wrote:
> I
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 07:40, Vladimir I. wrote:
> In my experience you have to be careful with uClibc.. I also tried migrating to
> it and while the binaries seemed to run, I got various glitches and strange
> behavior.
Which binaries caused problems? uClibc gets better and better all the
time
Hmm... Don't remember exactly now. I think it was Zebra.
Richard Doyle wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 07:40, Vladimir I. wrote:
>
>>In my experience you have to be careful with uClibc.. I also tried migrating to
>>it and while the binaries seemed to run, I got various glitches and strange
>>b
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 08:30, Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I managed to build an (allmost) complete version of Bering RC3 against
> uClibc 0.9.12. This version is *a lot* smaller than the original versionbuild
Cool.
> against GLIBC2. I tested the following modules: weblet, root, initrd, d
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 10:39, Richard Doyle wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 08:30, Eric Spakman wrote:
> > I don't know if uClibc is the way to go for LEAF, but it's rappidly evolving.
> > Glibc 2.0.7 is not maintained and Glibc 2.2.x is just to big to fit on a floppy.
>
> If enough of us use uCl
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 11:01, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 10:39, Richard Doyle wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 08:30, Eric Spakman wrote:
> > > I don't know if uClibc is the way to go for LEAF, but it's rappidly evolving.
> > > Glibc 2.0.7 is not maintained and Glibc 2.2.x is just t
On 9 Jul 2002, Richard Doyle wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 11:01, Mike Noyes wrote:
[...]
> > The other possibility is static
> > complies. I thought someone said that uClibc static binaries were
> > actually smaller than ones compiled dynamically. Is this correct?
>
> I doubt it, but haven't
Hi all,
We are developing an antivirus gateway based on Leaf Bering. Right now we
have been able to acomplish the following:
1) Using emailrelay (http://emailrelay.sourceforge.net) we have been able
to implement an smtp gateway. In proxy mode there is no need for a physicall
storage wit
I have made the following changes:
There is now a link at the botom of the page that lets you download the weblet.lrp
file. This will make it easier to play with the changes I have been making or to make
changes to this base.
A few minor changes to the weblet.structures file and to the
First of all, I would like to thank-you, kitakura, for updating us
on your project and clarifying any assumptions that I made based
on what little information I interpreted from various websites. TY :-)
I offer my apologies for any false information/assumptions that I may
have made!
On Monday 0
> > # I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc code of
> > Bering. # I am thankful to many developers.
>
> This is where I was really concerned. Are you using Bering and/or
> Dachstein IDE code for "sale-only" products that do not have open
> code equivilents (ie... floppy-only
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 00:27, kitakura wrote:
> Don't worry. I am following GPL .
Thank-you :-)
I'm looking forward to seeing IPNuts succeed,
and I appreciate your time and effort with my concerns.
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.n
From: Jeff Newmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Richard Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Leaf-devel] Bering RC3 build with uClibc
Date sent: Tue,
18 matches
Mail list logo
