Re: [leaf-devel] /linuxrc testing - round 2

2004-05-06 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: Charles; I may have found another small problem: firewall# lrpkg -i squid-2.lrp Installing squid-2 ... cat: /var/lib/lrpkg//boot.fstype: No such file or directory Done. I was told: It could be a bug (from the lrpkg script): echo "$fn=-t `cat $lrpkgpath/boot.fstype` $d">>

Re: [leaf-devel] /linuxrc testing - round 2

2004-05-06 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Charles; I may have found another small problem: firewall# lrpkg -i squid-2.lrp Installing squid-2 ... cat: /var/lib/lrpkg//boot.fstype: No such file or directory Done. I was told: It could be a bug (from the lrpkg script): echo "$fn=-t `cat $lrpkgpath/boot.fstype` $d">>"$lrpkgpath/backdisk"  

Re: [leaf-devel] /linuxrc testing - round 2

2004-05-06 Thread Erich Titl
Charles At 13:19 06.05.2004, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Erich Titl wrote: No offense intended, I just felt that, if you go to the trouble of naming root.blk.mk explicitly after the type of device it builds, it would be logical to name the one that builds the character device nodes accordingly

Re: [leaf-devel] /linuxrc testing - round 2

2004-05-06 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Erich Titl wrote: No offense intended, I just felt that, if you go to the trouble of naming root.blk.mk explicitly after the type of device it builds, it would be logical to name the one that builds the character device nodes accordingly, e.g. root.chr.mk. None taken. The root.blk.mk name was jus

Re: [leaf-devel] /linuxrc testing - round 2

2004-05-06 Thread Erich Titl
Charles At 17:26 05.05.2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >Erich Titl wrote: > >>Charles >>I looked at the new linuxrc, nice, modular, easier to maintain. >>At 22:14 05.05.2004, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >> >>>- /dev/null in root.dev.mk (should be in root.blk.mk even though it's not a b