Charles

At 13:19 06.05.2004, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
<snip>
No offense intended, I just felt that, if you go to the trouble of naming root.blk.mk explicitly after the type of device it builds, it would be logical to name the one that builds the character device nodes accordingly, e.g. root.chr.mk.

None taken. The root.blk.mk name was just something I came up with trying to stick with the previous naming convention and keep the name short. At the time, I couldn't think of a better name.


It just occured to me that perhaps the file should be named "init.dev.mk".

Anyone else like that better than root.blk.mk, or got a better suggestion?

Not really, as you stated before names are... just names


BTW. I got 2.4.24 running with modularised iptables/conntrack modules right now with the disabled keyboard patch, but this is just another compile round. I patched and compiled OpenSwan 1.0.3 against it (slink), no packaging yet.

cheers
Erich

THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to