On Monday 07 January 2008 22:27:04 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:56 Erich Titl wrote:
> >> Hi Eric
> >>
> >> Eric Spakman wrote:
> >>> Hi Erich,
> >>>
> >>> Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
> >>> did yo
KP
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:56 Erich Titl wrote:
>> Hi Eric
>>
>> Eric Spakman wrote:
>>> Hi Erich,
>>>
>>> Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
>>> did you compile your own?
>> To start with, no. I am using the one that works fi
On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:56 Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> Eric Spakman wrote:
> > Hi Erich,
> >
> > Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
> > did you compile your own?
>
> To start with, no. I am using the one that works fine with 3.1beta1. I
> just compil
Hi Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
> did you compile your own?
To start with, no. I am using the one that works fine with 3.1beta1. I
just compiled it today to have a debug image, but the output is
insufficient to
Hi Erich,
Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
did you compile your own?
Eric
>>
>>
>> Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the
>> two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox.
>
> Yes, strange indeed, I just looked at
Hi Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the
> two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox.
Yes, strange indeed, I just looked at .config again to double check the
settings.
So I wonder what
> can cause this pro
Hi Erich,
Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the
two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox. So I wonder what
can cause this problem... besides an ntpd init script (busybox change in
init applet?) or a busybox command used in the ntp scripts..
Eric
>>
Hi Eric
changing thread as the original issue is gone.
Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> Do you still have "CONFIG_FEATURE_IFUPDOWN_IP_BUILTIN=y" enabled in
> busybox? This shouldn't be because we are using the full version of the
> iptools.
I removed it again as it serves no purpose for us.
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 00:12:56 Erich Titl wrote:
>> KP
>>
>> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
>>> On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wrote:
KP
>> ...
>>
>>> I'm pretty shure we never enabled busybox ip and used iproute instead.
>> OK
>>
What do you get
Hi Erich,
Do you still have "CONFIG_FEATURE_IFUPDOWN_IP_BUILTIN=y" enabled in
busybox? This shouldn't be because we are using the full version of the
iptools.
Eric
> KP
>
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
>
>> On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wrote:
>>
>>> KP
>>>
> ...
>
>>
>> I'm p
On Monday 07 January 2008 00:12:56 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wrote:
> >> KP
>
> ...
>
> > I'm pretty shure we never enabled busybox ip and used iproute instead.
>
> OK
>
> >> What do you get with
> >>
> >> ls -l `which ip
11 matches
Mail list logo
