Re: [leaf-devel] Project description

2008-03-05 Thread Lynn Avants
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 03:18 pm, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: [...] > *) A recursive description may be intellectually pleasing, but > is never estetically pleasing, and anyway the borderline > to ridicule is not constant among people encountering the > particular notion. The nee

Re: [leaf-devel] Project description

2008-03-05 Thread Martin Hejl
Hi all, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > I always preferred the second one and that's, what I started with to > enhance/change it: > > "LEAF is a Linux Embedded Appliance Framework. > Branches provides various appliance-oriented tasks: LAN/WAN router, Internet > border router/firewalls, wireless acces

Re: [leaf-devel] Project description

2008-03-05 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Hello folks, two short observations: *) By eliminating the abreviations " (WAP)", " (NAS/SAN)" sixteen characters can be put to better use, since these are so well known. I see more merit in keeping PBX since it is not built from initials only. *) A recursive description may b