On 1/3/02 at 5:42 PM, arne @ loopback . org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ... but it should be clear that this
> will only work with configuration files NOT containing
> anything else than configuration keys-value pairs and
> comments (and no shell script functions like dachstein had
> in previous
Richard Doyle wrote:
>Eric Anderson is still maintaining it. I also don't know how to evaluate
>the security of uClibc, as opposed to glibc.
>
I've seen others asking about this too, and I've been wondering about
this myself. I wouldn't know how it compares to a recent glibc, but
compared to
> arne @ loopback . org wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc
> >again, and made a
> >first test version of a text/menu based version of a config
> >frontend for lrp
> >(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on
> >lrp 2.9.8 and
> >soon uCl
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> I do like the idea. But I wonder if it will be worth the extra space
>>this takes when we switch to a decent libc finally (if ever). But of
>>course you are using uClibc. BTW, while we are at it, Charles, how
>>do you feel about a uClibc based version of Dachste
> I do like the idea. But I wonder if it will be worth the extra space
> this takes when we switch to a decent libc finally (if ever). But of
> course you are using uClibc. BTW, while we are at it, Charles, how
> do you feel about a uClibc based version of Dachstein? I've been playing
> with
arne @ loopback . org wrote:
>Hi,
>
>i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc again, and made a
>first test version of a text/menu based version of a config frontend for lrp
>(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on lrp 2.9.8 and
>soon uClibc).
>
I've been playin
At 2002-01-03 17:42 +0100, arne @ loopback . org wrote:
>i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc again, and made a
>first test version of a text/menu based version of a config frontend for lrp
>(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on lrp 2.9.8 and
>soon uClibc).
> i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc again, and made a
> first test version of a text/menu based version of a config frontend for
lrp
> (it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on lrp 2.9.8 and
> soon uClibc).
> For now it just configures the stuff in the netwo
Hi,
i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc again, and made a
first test version of a text/menu based version of a config frontend for lrp
(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on lrp 2.9.8 and
soon uClibc).
For now it just configures the stuff in the network.co
