K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
Charles;
I may have found another small problem:
firewall# lrpkg -i squid-2.lrp
Installing squid-2 ... cat: /var/lib/lrpkg//boot.fstype: No such file or
directory
Done.
I was told:
It could be a bug (from the lrpkg script):
echo "$fn=-t `cat $lrpkgpath/boot.fstype` $d">>
Charles;
I may have found another small problem:
firewall# lrpkg -i squid-2.lrp
Installing squid-2 ... cat: /var/lib/lrpkg//boot.fstype: No such file or
directory
Done.
I was told:
It could be a bug (from the lrpkg script):
echo "$fn=-t `cat $lrpkgpath/boot.fstype` $d">>"$lrpkgpath/backdisk"
Charles
At 13:19 06.05.2004, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
No offense intended, I just felt that, if you go to the trouble of naming
root.blk.mk explicitly after the type of device it builds, it would be
logical to name the one that builds the character device nodes
accordingly
Erich Titl wrote:
No offense intended, I just felt that, if you go to the trouble of naming root.blk.mk explicitly after the type of device it builds, it would be logical to name the one that builds the character device nodes accordingly, e.g. root.chr.mk.
None taken. The root.blk.mk name was jus
Charles
At 17:26 05.05.2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>Erich Titl wrote:
>
>>Charles
>>I looked at the new linuxrc, nice, modular, easier to maintain.
>>At 22:14 05.05.2004, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>>
>>>- /dev/null in root.dev.mk (should be in root.blk.mk even though it's not a b
Erich Titl wrote:
Charles
I looked at the new linuxrc, nice, modular, easier to maintain.
At 22:14 05.05.2004, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
- /dev/null in root.dev.mk (should be in root.blk.mk even though it's not
a block device, as it's used early in the init scripts).
Would this not, for
Charles
I looked at the new linuxrc, nice, modular, easier to maintain.
At 22:14 05.05.2004, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
- /dev/null in root.dev.mk (should be in root.blk.mk even though it's not
a block device, as it's used early in the init scripts).
Would this not, for consistency's sake,
> Thanks to Eric, there's a new version of the updated linuxrc package
> available (posted on my website):
> http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/files/kernels/misc-stuff/linuxrc-2004-05-05.tgz
>
> IIRC, this fixes a few minor bugs, including:
>
> - /dev/null in root.dev.mk (should be in root.blk.mk even
Eric Spakman wrote:
Do you want to go ahead and make these changes and release a new tar.gz
file?
Attached you will find the updated tar.gz
Thanks to Eric, there's a new version of the updated linuxrc package
available (posted on my website):
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/files/kernels/misc-stuff/l
The next version of /linuxrc is ready for testing. Lots of changes in
this version (not just to linuxrc)...see the changelogs and README in
the tarball for full details:
http://lrp2.steinkuehler.net/files/kernels/misc-stuff/linuxrc-2004-03-23.tgz
This version requires the use of a 'split' root
10 matches
Mail list logo
