Hi KP
at 01.09.2011 18:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Besides the structure (where Andrew may have an better response, what needs
to
be done, if we change it), keep in mind that a lot of hardware related
modules
are in initrd - they are still installed if you remove them and save
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:59 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
Hi Folks
I am trying to reduce the footprint of the modules.lrp archive. I looked
at /lib/modules and found a completely unstructured module directory.
Is there a reason why we do that? This is so different from any other
Linux
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 23:37:35 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 31.08.2011 20:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
...
I would like you to reconsider this decision.
I understand that modules.lrp is too big once a box is configured, but
pls be carefully removing
Hi Folks
I am trying to reduce the footprint of the modules.lrp archive. I looked
at /lib/modules and found a completely unstructured module directory.
Is there a reason why we do that? This is so different from any other
Linux distribution that it is difficult to compare. Some of the modules
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 08:59:07 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
I am trying to reduce the footprint of the modules.lrp archive. I looked
at /lib/modules and found a completely unstructured module directory.
Is there a reason why we do that?
Up to version 3 it was filled
Hi KP
on 31.08.2011 20:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
...
I would like you to reconsider this decision.
I understand that modules.lrp is too big once a box is configured, but pls be
carefully removing modules, as they may be needed by others running a
different
setup.
A
01.09.2011 00:37, Erich Titl пишет:
Hi KP
on 31.08.2011 20:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
...
I would like you to reconsider this decision.
I understand that modules.lrp is too big once a box is configured, but pls be
carefully removing modules, as they may be needed by others
