09.08.2012 21:38, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am 09.08.2012 20:15, schrieb Andrew:
>> 09.08.2012 20:13, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Am 29.07.2012 14:10, schrieb Andrew:
29.07.2012 13:05, david M brooke пишет:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 18:54 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
>> Current git
Am 09.08.2012 20:15, schrieb Andrew:
> 09.08.2012 20:13, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>> Am 29.07.2012 14:10, schrieb Andrew:
>>> 29.07.2012 13:05, david M brooke пишет:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 18:54 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Current git sources build fine for x86 and I had only one err
09.08.2012 20:13, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am 29.07.2012 14:10, schrieb Andrew:
>> 29.07.2012 13:05, david M brooke пишет:
>>> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 18:54 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>>>
Current git sources build fine for x86 and I had only one error
(oprofile) for arm-versatile.
>>> I
Am 29.07.2012 14:10, schrieb Andrew:
> 29.07.2012 13:05, david M brooke пишет:
>> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 18:54 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>>
>>> Current git sources build fine for x86 and I had only one error
>>> (oprofile) for arm-versatile.
>> I also get that one build error on any non-x86 plat
Am 29.07.2012 22:13, schrieb david M brooke:
> On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 12:00 +0300, Andrew wrote:
>>
>> I finished merge; it seems that there is no troubles - but I haven't
>> time to re-check this. So anybody pls update to new master and try to
>> compile all.
>
> Completely new clone of master
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 12:00 +0300, Andrew wrote:
>
> I finished merge; it seems that there is no troubles - but I haven't
> time to re-check this. So anybody pls update to new master and try to
> compile all.
Completely new clone of master builds OK for me :-) - 201 packages, all
"green"
And 4
29.07.2012 13:05, david M brooke пишет:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 18:54 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
>> Current git sources build fine for x86 and I had only one error
>> (oprofile) for arm-versatile.
> I also get that one build error on any non-x86 platform.
> The OpenWrt team have the same probl
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 11:50 +0100, david M brooke wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 23:50 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> >
> > What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
> > samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h).
>
> I am currently seeing a clean build
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 18:54 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Current git sources build fine for x86 and I had only one error
> (oprofile) for arm-versatile.
I also get that one build error on any non-x86 platform.
The OpenWrt team have the same problem, and they have a patch to fix :-)
See https:
28.07.2012 21:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Hi Andrew;
>
> Am 28.07.2012 19:07, schrieb Andrew:
>> 28.07.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Hi Andrew;
>>>
>>> Am 25.07.2012 22:50, schrieb Andrew:
Hi all.
What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
28.07.2012 21:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Hi Andrew;
>
> Am 28.07.2012 19:07, schrieb Andrew:
>> 28.07.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Hi Andrew;
>>>
>>> Am 25.07.2012 22:50, schrieb Andrew:
Hi all.
What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
Hi Andrew;
Am 28.07.2012 19:07, schrieb Andrew:
> 28.07.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>> Hi Andrew;
>>
>> Am 25.07.2012 22:50, schrieb Andrew:
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
>>> samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uui
28.07.2012 20:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am 28.07.2012 18:50, schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi.
>>
>> 27.07.2012 13:50, david M brooke пишет:
Also I planned to add zram support (I think that using it in usual way -
as swap - should be optimal) - but it isn't showstopper for alpha
release, thi
28.07.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Hi Andrew;
>
> Am 25.07.2012 22:50, schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
>> samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h).
> I do not see showstoppers (based on a version
Am 28.07.2012 18:50, schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
>
> 27.07.2012 13:50, david M brooke пишет:
>>> Also I planned to add zram support (I think that using it in usual way -
>>> as swap - should be optimal) - but it isn't showstopper for alpha
>>> release, this will be a minor change (mostly - kernel config
Hi Andrew;
Am 25.07.2012 22:50, schrieb Andrew:
> Hi all.
>
> What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
> samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h).
I do not see showstoppers (based on a version build two weeks ago).
Current git sources build
Hi.
27.07.2012 13:50, david M brooke пишет:
>> Also I planned to add zram support (I think that using it in usual way -
>> as swap - should be optimal) - but it isn't showstopper for alpha
>> release, this will be a minor change (mostly - kernel config will be
>> changed, + small init modification
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 23:50 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
> samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h).
I am currently seeing a clean build for all packages when using the i486
toolchain
Hi all.
What showstoppers we have for tagging BuC 5.0-alpha release? I saw that
samba still fails to build due to headers missing (uuid/uuid.h).
Also I planned to add zram support (I think that using it in usual way -
as swap - should be optimal) - but it isn't showstopper for alpha
release, t
19 matches
Mail list logo
