[leaf-devel] upgrade to 5.2.7

2016-09-14 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP It looks like the packages are not available for 5.2.7, but latest specifies 5.2.7 AP# upgrade -c aborting: cannot find https://sourceforge.net/p/leaf/packages/ci/5.2.7/tree/version cheers ET --

[leaf-devel] upgrade & apkg (was 5.2 & ezipupd will not work with legacy config file)

2015-10-14 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP Am 13.10.2015 um 17:33 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015, 16:49:04 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Am 13.10.2015 um 16:25 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >>> Hi Erich; >> >> ... >> .. >> >> I am wondering if I would have had no issues at all by upgrading step by >> step. I probably w

[leaf-devel] upgrade

2015-10-02 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP After my last experiences with upgrade it has been polished a little. Some features have been removed, a few bugfixes e.t.c. The current code is in maint and can/should be tested. Unfortunately it takes the latest busybox cpio to handle initrd/initmod formats correctly. So it is only workin

[leaf-devel] Upgrade to 5.2 woes (solved)

2015-09-30 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks For those of you who read the many messages about upgrading my wireless router to 5.2, here is the explanation of what had happened. Upgrade used a wong algorithm to combine initrd and initmod, so a number of modules were not loaded. This led to a plethora of weird symptoms which were ha

[leaf-devel] Upgrade of buildtool perl modules

2012-09-13 Thread Yves Blusseau
Hi all, i have upgraded the buildtool perl modules: * Add a new Tools library that contains functions that can be use by other modules. * Add a new function: expand_variables that is use to expand variables configuration * Rewrite some functions in pure perl to avoid spawning a process by call

Re: [leaf-devel] Upgrade of uClibc

2012-06-22 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; Am 17.06.2012 20:53, schrieb Andrew: > 11.06.2012 22:02, KP Kirchdoerfer написал: >> I talked with David it may be worth a test to update uClibc to 0.9.33.x >> instead of 0.9.32 for 5.x. > Hi. > At weekend I have some time to work on LEAF, so I upgraded uClibc to > 0.9.33.x - it seems

Re: [leaf-devel] Upgrade of uClibc

2012-06-17 Thread Andrew
11.06.2012 22:02, KP Kirchdoerfer написал: > I talked with David it may be worth a test to update uClibc to 0.9.33.x > instead of 0.9.32 for 5.x. Hi. At weekend I have some time to work on LEAF, so I upgraded uClibc to 0.9.33.x - it seems that all is working, asterisk building was breaked (caused

Re: [leaf-devel] Upgrade of uClibc

2012-06-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 11.06.2012 17:38, schrieb Andrew: > Hi. > This is bad idea, it can break all userland that was compiled for older > uClibc - so mixing different versions of base libs/compilers/kernels > isn't good idea for minor releases. > You can include new package into 5.x branch (I think we'll have first

Re: [leaf-devel] Upgrade of uClibc

2012-06-11 Thread Andrew
Hi. This is bad idea, it can break all userland that was compiled for older uClibc - so mixing different versions of base libs/compilers/kernels isn't good idea for minor releases. You can include new package into 5.x branch (I think we'll have first alpha in June/July), or you can try to patch

[leaf-devel] Upgrade of uClibc

2012-06-11 Thread Yves Blusseau
Hi all, i'm trying to build a new package: ndppd (http://www.priv.nu/projects/ndppd/) but our uClibc (v 0.9.30.3) have one missing defined constant: ETHERTYPE_IPV6. This constant is in the /usr/include/net/ethernet.h. For the moment i made a patch to add this constant for ndppd, but i think it w