Hi Erich;
Am Freitag, 20. Februar 2015, 10:59:45 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> did you get updated/rewritten text for the webconf packages and if so,
> have you been able to add them to the repository somewhere?
Yes Sam Lander provided reworked text - see commit
f45ce940d400960b4d99ac0c33abe0
Hi KP
did you get updated/rewritten text for the webconf packages and if so,
have you been able to add them to the repository somewhere?
cheers
ET
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
Download BIRT
Hi folks
I am about to give webconf a more consistant look and trying to do some
facelifting. This is more demanding than I expected, as every developer
added his own style, in coding and design (so did I). The most demanding
aspect of all appears to be the overwhelming code obfuscation and lack
o
Hi KP
Am 06.11.2014 um 20:36 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> HI Erich;
>
> Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, 20:08:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I believe I recall that there was a webconf interface for WiFi. Am I
>> mistaken or has it just been dropped.
>
> looked into git log for webconf an
HI Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, 20:08:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi folks
>
> I believe I recall that there was a webconf interface for WiFi. Am I
> mistaken or has it just been dropped.
looked into git log for webconf and it looks it hasn't dropped, just never
made it into the repositor
Hi folks
I believe I recall that there was a webconf interface for WiFi. Am I
mistaken or has it just been dropped.
Thanks
Erich
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
__
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 21:59:49 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> Webconf right now is handled like any other package, but unfortunately
> this is not the case as there is no monolithic webconf tarball on the
> net which can just be fetched, configured and compiled (and is updated
> at inter
Hi Folks
Webconf right now is handled like any other package, but unfortunately
this is not the case as there is no monolithic webconf tarball on the
net which can just be fetched, configured and compiled (and is updated
at intervals). We are pretty much on our own here. It is quite difficult
to t
Am Sonntag, 1. Februar 2009 16:08:10 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi folks
>
> I would like to request haserl to be upgraded, as the current version
> 0.8.0 is lacking functionality in the file upload area. I did an upgrade
> to 0.9.25 myself but then it should be put in the mainstream in order to
> take
Hi folks
I would like to request haserl to be upgraded, as the current version
0.8.0 is lacking functionality in the file upload area. I did an upgrade
to 0.9.25 myself but then it should be put in the mainstream in order to
take care of the CGI incompatibilities
I am currently tinkering on exten
Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> fre 2008-04-25 klockan 18:18 +0200 skrev Per Sjoholm:
>> Hi
>> Is there a way of having the webconf showing what version of packages is
>> used
>> apkg -l does it from command line
>>
>> /Per
>>
>
> I have implemented the displaying of active packages
It
Hello,
fre 2008-04-25 klockan 18:18 +0200 skrev Per Sjoholm:
> Hi
> Is there a way of having the webconf showing what version of packages is
> used
> apkg -l does it from command line
>
> /Per
>
I have implemented the displaying of active packages
as part of the "General Health" page. Thus thi
Hi
Is there a way of having the webconf showing what version of packages is
used
apkg -l does it from command line
/Per
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting eve
Hi Kp,
>
>Hi;
>
>thx - I'm running latest from cvs and see:
>
>"grep: /etc/init.d/init.d: No such file or directory grep: /etc/init.d/init.d:
>No such file or directory"
>
>At the end of various (each?) daemon description - e.g. dnsmasq.
>
>I don't think this is intended.
>
Did you also used the
Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 21:58 schrieb Eric Spakman:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> >
> > I just posted the source and binary versions of webconf.lrp and
> > webconf.lwp. Your changes to lrcfg.back.cgi were heroic.
> >
> :)))
> :
> > I decided to
> > shortcut the whol
Hi Nathan,
Thank you very much!
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> I just posted the source and binary versions of webconf.lrp and
> webconf.lwp. Your changes to lrcfg.back.cgi were heroic.
:)))
> I decided to
> shortcut the whole thing and make webconf (backup, at least) work with
> Bering uClibc *only*.
> (Sin
Hi Eric,
I just posted the source and binary versions of webconf.lrp and webconf.lwp.
Your changes to lrcfg.back.cgi were heroic. I decided to shortcut the whole
thing and make webconf (backup, at least) work with Bering uClibc *only*.
(Since Bering uClibc is the only one being updated at th
Hi Nathan,
>Bering uClibc team,
>
>Eric alerted me to the broken backup packages webconf. (sorry)
>
>While looking at it, I have a quick question re the new backup system.
>
>Should it be possible to backup moddb/configdb to any of the destinations
>in /var/lib/lrpkg/pkgpath.disks, or does it
Bering uClibc team,
Eric alerted me to the broken backup packages webconf. (sorry)
While looking at it, I have a quick question re the new backup system.
Should it be possible to backup moddb/configdb to any of the destinations
in /var/lib/lrpkg/pkgpath.disks, or does it now just use the fir
This is just a post to document some differences in webconf.lrp,
depending on where it comes from.
The short version is: If you use Bering-uClibc, use the webconf.lrp
included with Bering-uClibc. (e.g. you don't need to do anything, and
can ignore the rest of this message.)
In the cvs tree, lea
No real reason, only a technical one. The webconf package is maintained by
Nathan and in his CVS space, the script that builds the packages page only
looks at our 'own' Bering-uClibc CVS space. But the latest webconf package is
included in Bering-uClibc beta4.
Eric Spakman
>Is there a reason w
Is there a reason why webconf is not listed on the Packages 2.x page:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=3&MMN_position=3:3
On 5/12/05, Nathan Angelacos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I'm including this only to the developer list s
(I'm including this only to the developer list since it is probably more a
developer issue.)
Eric House submitted a patch to logfiles.cgi that allows the pretty-formatted
shorewall logs to be sorted by any column (nice!)
I committed everything to CVS today, including a new webconf.lrp, so its
Don't know if this made to the list of not. Seems I slipped up and left the
privacy crap that work email system puts on messages. I registered my home
email on the list so that doesn't happen again. Sorry.
I couldn't sleep last night, so I spent the time productively; thinking
about Webconf an
I couldn't sleep last night, so I spent the time productively; thinking
about Webconf and automating Bering in general. Some of the things I
thought we will need to EVENTUALLY get working is the detection and
installation of network interfaces. That seems to be the first big hurdle
for new LEAF
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 13:48, Nathan Angelacos wrote:
> If you wat to be a developer, Mike Noyes can set you up. If all you want is
> a place to put your creations, I'll be happy to host your work under the
> webconf cvs tree until things with the new website settle down again.
Roger,
I'll star
Hi Roger,
On Thursday 16 December 2004 10:16, Roger E McClurg wrote:
> thought that I might be able to help in developing LWPs. I was wondering
> who was currently working on LWPs and which ones they are working on. If
> there is a particular LWP that needs attacking, I'd be glad to give it a
> s
I have been a user of LEAF variants since early Eigerstein. For years I
have been taking from this community. I would like to be able to give
something back. I don't know if I need to be an official developer or what.
I am open to suggestions.
I was in the process of putting together a web GUI
Erich, Thanks for your comments.
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 14:56, Erich Titl wrote:
> Nathan
>
> I am trying to upgrade webconf to the latest beta and to my environment.
> A few questions arise.
>
> - The left menu bar in my case has a Networking and a System entry along
> with entries for
Nathan
I am trying to upgrade webconf to the latest beta and to my environment.
A few questions arise.
- The left menu bar in my case has a Networking and a System entry along
with entries for root.net and root.sys.
It appears that the menu entries are generated by looking into the
/var/lib/lrp
Thanks for your comments, Eric.
> An other option is to add the plugins from within webconf itself,
with a
> webconf like "leaf.cfg" file. I think for people using webconf, it
doesn't
> matter where the list is saved. I think it's even easier to hide
that layer
> for most users. The only
To allow third-party plugins for webconf, I would like to propose the
following:
webconf "plugins" have the name "LWP" (Leaf [Webconf | Web] [Plugin |
Package])
The format is a gzipped tar archive with
/var/webconf/www/*.cgi
/var/webconf/conf/*.webconf
For instance, the dropbear.lwp could
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
__
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
__
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
__
I have placed the web configuration sources and some documentation in cvs:
( http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/devel/nangel/webconf )
This is a reference design, I'd be interested in knowing what can make it
better. I attempted to write the document in the format of the Bering-uClibc
D
36 matches
Mail list logo
