> > > The "ipup" package is in my opinion "to old" for 2.4.xx
> > > and iproute based systems
> > Well I do not know what you mean by "too old". It is the
> > latest "sid" debian version and I adapted it to replace
> > the ifconfig/route commands by the ip addr/ip route combo.
> > Jacques
>
>
I've sucessfully migrated my Dachstein floppy distro. to use Etherboot
as the boot loader.
That's nothing special in itself however I've documented the process and
modified an existing contrib/mklrpnb script to make the task a little
easier. The script also modifies two files, the network.conf an
> now... to really mess things up I have a couple
> SMP mother board I would like to put to use..
> actually my LEAF is running on one now... I know
> its probably over kill, but I have no other use for it
> but I thought I would add a lot of packages (LaBrea)
> and such, and wondered if there
- Forwarded message from -
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:19:29 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bering + dachstein ipsec monster
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
I have now been successful at building an ipsec kernel for bering (2.4.17) and
using the utilities
Thanks TO your help My LRP is terrific.
now... to really mess things up I have a couple
SMP mother board I would like to put to use..
actually my LEAF is running on one now... I know
its probably over kill, but I have no other use for it
but I thought I would add a lot of packages (L
> > The "ipup" package is in my opinion "to old" for 2.4.xx
> > and iproute based systems
> Well I do not know what you mean by "too old". It is the
> latest "sid" debian version and I adapted it to replace
> the ifconfig/route commands by the ip addr/ip route combo.
> Jacques
Would you
On Saturday 16 March 2002 15:14, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> IIRC, someone else reported this happening as well. It's either a
> case of the dhcp client scripts I converted to using the 'ip' command
> (instead of ifconfig), the ISP's dhcp server doing something strange
> (quite likely, since t
Jim Van Eeckhoutte wrote:
> How do I check for modem functionality in Bering?
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=558979&forum_id=5483
Jacques
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listin
> I am using the floppy image of Dachstein with pppoe from Kenneth Hadley.
> The system is a PII 266 mhz with 64 meg of ram and 2 Netgear FA310 nics
> which use the tulip driver. The connection can be up for 1 or 2 weeks
> and then later in the day I can not connect to anything. Looking at the
> 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
> link/ether 00:20:18:8c:e4:9c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 24.81.204.141/23 brd 24.81.205.255 scope global eth0
> inet 24.81.192.89/22 brd 24.81.195.255 scope global eth0
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmas
How do I check for modem functionality in Bering?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-user] re:56k modem in Bering
yes Ray it is a real modem. usr
At 2002-03-16 11:10 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
>On Friday 15 March 2002 13:31, Greg Mader wrote:
> > Is there a simple, easy to use distro that does all of this? How
> > hard would it be to add PPTP to one of the existing distros?
>
>I think someone came out with a PPTP server package some time
>ag
At 06:21 PM 3/16/02 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>yes Ray it is a real modem. usr 56k
OK. Good. In that case, other than the step of needing to figure out what
ttyS* device the modem is, it should be a standard install. (Actually, I
shouldn't need even to make this qualification, since you alw
yes Ray it is a real modem. usr 56k
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
If you don't absolutely have to use ssh, consider zebedee. A tunnel.lrp
with zebedee and an (archaic) telnetd masses just 66702 bytes (compiled
with uClibc, so glibc versions might be larger).
-Richard
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O
On Friday 15 March 2002 13:31, Greg Mader wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is my situation:
>
> I have an existing Linux WAN setup between two offices. One of the
> boxes has a Sangoma WANPIPE card to a T-1, and a DMZ interface, as
> well as a private network interface. I wish to run a VPN between
> t
Ahhh, the link to the "udhcp" package is at:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/guitarlynn
Sorry ;-)
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!
__
On Friday 15 March 2002 16:34, Brian Boonstra wrote:
> Hi
>
> I note that Jacques Nilo has a nice modern pair of sshd.lrp and
> ssh.lrp on the LEAF website. I was thinking of upgrading, but I
> still like to try to get by with a single floppy, while those
> packages are > 300K each (and the
On Friday 15 March 2002 17:55, Don Laursen wrote:
> Above is captured from the weblet. After my internal network stopped
> working to the outside world.
>
> It appears that my ISP has just changed IP subnetting and ETH0 has 2
> IP addresses, probably an anomoly. My plan does allow 2 DHCP
> addres
Others have already answered *most* of what this question might mean. Let me
try to pull it all together, and add the one missing bit.
If the modem in question is a "real" modem (one with its own UART), then the
standard ppp stuff should operate it. It's no different from an external
modem connec
On Friday 15 March 2002 09:43, Joey Officer wrote:
> I've noticed since I started using the udchpd.lrp package, that after
> a few days I can longer obtain an IP through using a ipconfig /renew
> (WinNT 4.0). I keep the IP I've got right up until I decide to
> /release it, however one I drop it, i
I don't know what the big deal is.
Some one wrote to the list about root access from
Apache cgi. I responded with a Reply with History
from Lotus Notes ( sorry that's what my company uses).
My email was rejected by the moderator. I don't know why
and don't really care. The original message
PASI RAUHANIEMI wrote:
> Hi! I added the bridge module, but backup menu 3) etc does not backup /etc/modules.
>Or what?. /lib/modules/bridge.o is ok & manual insmod.
>
Well you have to backup modules.lrp not etc.lrp to save modules in /lib/modules. See
the doc
Jacques
___
Hi! I added the bridge module, but backup menu 3) etc does not backup /etc/modules. Or
what?. /lib/modules/bridge.o is ok & manual insmod.
- - - Sunpoint.net tiedustelee: - - -
Suliko sähköpostisi?
Hae uusi painamalla tästä!
http://www.sunpoint.net/SunAds/click.htm?mode=footer&id=68&jump=http%
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> I guess you can't do a double NAT.
>
> I've also tried that to no avail...
>
> You must try to get them to configure the Cisco 1720
> as Bridge with at least one public IP on your side.
>
> Then you can use LEAF to do the rest of the job.
Won't happen
Jim Van Eeckhoutte wrote:
> Ah oh a newbie question. How does one get a internal 56k modem to work
> in bering? Ive read the howtos but none on modem. Im trying to get a
> router goin to share verizon dialup for office. Right now office is
> using ICS on a ME machine(very unreliable). Any respons
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Simon Bolduc wrote:
> I've found that using older NICs is generally your best bet if using a
> consumer DSL or Cable connection. You'll probably never saturate the 10
> Mb/s offered by them and you can avoid all the potential Driver related
> pitfalls (different chipset revi
If I recall correctly, that was as small as he was able to get sshv2.
As he had so many requests, he posted them in the hopes that someone
would be able to get it smaller.
See this post for a bit more info.
http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03036.ht
ml
-sp
-Ori
28 matches
Mail list logo
