At 11:51 PM 10/4/02 -0400, Bob Skaroff comcast.net wrote:
>I'm running Dachstein linux 4.0.6 with private.network at 192.168.1 and
>dmz.network at 192.168.2.
>The web server on dmz.network can be reached from the net.
"the" net? Do you mean the Internet? If so, this is inconsistent with my
tests
I'm running Dachstein linux 4.0.6 with private.network at 192.168.1 and
dmz.network at 192.168.2.
The web server on dmz.network can be reached from the net.
Mail sent to the mail server on dmz.network returns an error message to the
sender.
I've tried varying the coding of the DMZ_OPEN_DEST and DM
You will need to use squid. All port 80 requests can be redirected to
3128 the default port for squid using iptables. In squid, you can ban
sites by regular expression matching. This, however, does not eliminate
IP based access. Squidguard or dansguardian do this. I've seen
squidguard in lrp but d
Hi,
If I want to prevent people from playing online game,
watching online video, listening online music and
downloading any file bigger than 5M, what I should
use?
Can any LEAF tool support this?
Kind Regards,
Liumei
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hil
> Option 3: proceed as you have been, using a
> different private-address range
> (192.168.2.0/24) on your LAN, and have the router
> NAT (MASQ) the LAN.
> Matthew's suggestion on the forward-chain rule is
> correct for this, except
> that it has to be the first relevant rule the
> packets enc
Hello Craig , list,
> Hi Eric,
> Yes, that's absolutely correct. They are two different physical
> locations. We have an IT department that does not allow us to "touch"
> the incoming line at the router to the school. They will just allow us
> to use the extra public IP addresses that we would a
Hi Eric,
Yes, that's absolutely correct. They are two different physical
locations. We have an IT department that does not allow us to "touch"
the incoming line at the router to the school. They will just allow us
to use the extra public IP addresses that we would actually connect to
inside my off
