Support Requests item #677595, was opened at 2003-01-30 12:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=677595&group_id=13751
Category: packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Dushok (bdushok)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes
OK. I understand that process. But if my fetches every email, then
tells the server to delete them, how is it that it fetches them again?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erich Titl
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
Support Requests item #677584, was opened at 2003-01-30 12:19
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=677584&group_id=13751
Category: packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Dushok (bdushok)
Assigned to: Mike Noyes (mhnoyes
> Peter -- is the problem then to get Shorewall to PASS VRRP
> packets (as
> opposed to the problem statement in the original post)?
I assume they are compatible and it should even be easy to configure
shorewall to pass the traffic through. I'll be setting up keepalived to
authenticate to the o
--On Friday, January 31, 2003 5:28 PM -0800 Peter Mueller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am just curious if anyone has used the shorewall package as well as
keepalived on the same system. And how did you overcome the
issue of both
shorewall and keepalived wanting to do VRRP for the ip
addresses?
Hi Charles,
> I am just curious if anyone has used the shorewall package as well as
> keepalived on the same system. And how did you overcome the
> issue of both
> shorewall and keepalived wanting to do VRRP for the ip
> addresses? Just got
> this dropped in my lap and not really sure how t
--On Friday, January 31, 2003 6:35 PM -0600 Charles Holbrook
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am just curious if anyone has used the shorewall package as well as
keepalived on the same system. And how did you overcome the issue of
both shorewall and keepalived wanting to do VRRP for the ip address
I am just curious if anyone has used the shorewall package as well as
keepalived on the same system. And how did you overcome the issue of both
shorewall and keepalived wanting to do VRRP for the ip addresses? Just got
this dropped in my lap and not really sure how to proceed with this.
--
The local computer store has some gigabit ethernet cards on sale. I was
wondering if I could buy say three of these cards and create a high
speed gigabit switch with either Dachstein or Bering?
If I take the bottom range of the static list of IP addresses reserved
for servers in the LEAF world
hullo.
I'm in need of a linux-based vpn client to connect to my employer's Secure
Computing Sidewinder firewall. We currently have windows software, but I
have a windows workstation behind a linux router and I believe that there
is something in linux NAT that is causing the VPN to disconnect ever
Todd;
don't know if you have seen this one:
http://www.freeswan.ca/docs/freeswan-1.99/doc/faq.html#pmtu.broken
kp
Am Freitag, 31. Januar 2003 03:55 schrieb Todd Pearsall:
> I'm pretty sure I'm having fragmentation issues for packets sent over
> the IPSEC tunnel. Regular internet traffic passes
Todd Pearsall wrote:
I'm pretty sure I'm having fragmentation issues for packets sent over
the IPSEC tunnel. Regular internet traffic passes fine, downloads are
Ok, etc. Over the VPN, connections hand for anything except the
smallest changes.
For example:
- I can make an ftp connection, get
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 22:34, Brad Fritz wrote:
>
> Sean,
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:16:58 EST Sean wrote:
>
> > I created new .lrp files with the correct path (no ./etc) and I'm still
> > having the tar problem. Anyone have any thoughts? I'm using the Bering
> > 2.4.18 diskette contents and th
John
well inherent, yes it is. On POP3 what your mail client basically does is
- it (maybe) fetches a list of messages from the server
- it fetches every message on the server
- and subsequently tells the server to delete it (unless you tell it
otherwise)
so you see your problem really might be
14 matches
Mail list logo
