Dear List,
I just dnatted my ssh port of Bering 1.0 to a sshd-server inside my
localnet. Works fine :-). But I am concerned about security I would
like to restrict ssh-logins from a list of MAC-Addresses.
I had a look into /etc/shorewall/rules and tried net:~00-00-00-00-00-00
(-- somethin´
Dear list !
I am trying to use two IDE-CDrom drives, I recently connected to my
Bering 1.0-Box loading of moduls succeeded, both drives are found while
loading the moduls. Manufacturer name and other stuff is recognized
correctly.
How do I access the devices ?
mount /dev/hd[ab] /mnt
results: no
Ok, I finally got the via-rhine driver installed, but now I can't get the
dhcp client running (I've got a cable modem internet connection). After
some browsing through the docs I noticed dhclient.lrp is not standard
included in Bering, which seems strange since the default network setup
is eth0
Dear List,
what features does Bering have thinking of stateful inspection ?
Every (commercial) FW does have a feature named stateful inspection.
Whats about Bering ?
To prevent a discussion about What ist stateful inspection ? As far as
I know, it is nothing strictly defined, more a marketing name
Hein Bauer wrote:
Dear list !
I am trying to use two IDE-CDrom drives, I recently connected to my
Bering 1.0-Box loading of moduls succeeded, both drives are found while
loading the moduls. Manufacturer name and other stuff is recognized
correctly.
How do I access the devices ?
mount /dev/hd[ab]
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:40, Hein Bauer wrote:
Dear List,
I just dnatted my ssh port of Bering 1.0 to a sshd-server inside my
localnet. Works fine :-). But I am concerned about security I would
like to restrict ssh-logins from a list of MAC-Addresses.
I had a look into
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 04:11, Henning Jebsen wrote:
Dear List,
what features does Bering have thinking of stateful inspection ?
Every (commercial) FW does have a feature named stateful inspection.
Whats about Bering ?
To prevent a discussion about What ist stateful inspection ? As far as
I
Henning Jebsen wrote:
Dear List,
what features does Bering have thinking of stateful inspection ?
Every (commercial) FW does have a feature named stateful inspection.
Whats about Bering ?
To prevent a discussion about What ist stateful inspection ? As far as
I know, it is nothing strictly
Bering uses pump.lrp by default.
From: Alexander Borghgraef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] DHCP client
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 11:08:48 +0200 (CEST)
Ok, I finally got the via-rhine driver installed, but now I can't get the
dhcp client running (I've got a cable modem
To clarify, however...
Bering is indeed setup to use pump.lrp by default, and it works
extremely well. HOWEVER, since Bering is set up so that you can use
DHCP, PPP, or PPPoE with the default image, pump.lrp is NOT loaded by
default in syslinux.cfg.
So, if you open up syslinux.cfg and add
Tom Eastep wrote:
Unless the client is on the same network as you are, MAC matching won't
work.
Yes, I do fairly remember, MAC adresses is restricted to my LAN (on the
same cable).
OK.
-- changing topic to DYNDNS --
Currently my FW accepts TCP connections only from
myprivatnet.dyndns.info. So
I have another problem. My son is trying to access an
online gaming site and is running into a brick wall.
The site requires UDP port 2213 which I opened up with
no trouble. Whoever when he connects he gets the
following error message...
Your internet address changed! It was
At 03:29 PM 8/2/2003 -0700, Mike Koceja wrote:
I have another problem. My son is trying to access an
online gaming site and is running into a brick wall.
The site requires UDP port 2213 which I opened up with
no trouble. Whoever when he connects he gets the
following error message...
Your
Thank you to all that have helped me learn a bit as I go.
My question now is: I'd like to configure the internal network to ONLY
assign IP addresses to certain machines. I don't seem to have it correctly
configured. Could someone point me to something to read / learn about
this?
I've
Maybe this app requires more than one port like H323. Port forwarding might
then solve the problem.
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray Olszewski
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 5:22 AM
To: leaf
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] NAT Trouble
At
15 matches
Mail list logo