I agree that updating LEAF once a year is a pain. I usually build
another CF on a old box and just swap the CF, reboot once and its done.
Although it is not painless, each time I do it, I change things enough
to warrant the extra work. One of the questions was about write
protecting the CF.
I'm a Bering user, not a developer, but I too found the issues raised by
Troy and Richard relevant and interesting. May I contribute some
thoughts, even of they are more psychological than technical?
Troy wished for apt-get functionality. While I can understand the desire
for automating the proc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Troy Aden wrote:
| Wow I am sort of surprised that no one has responded to this thread. I
guess my concerns must be trivial. I really did not want to switch away from
this distro since it has worked so well for us for so many years but my case
for
Esteemed list
Today I had tried to reach leaf home page without
success.
Do you know what is happening ?
thanks
__
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
-
Martin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Hejl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I understand what you're saying - and I guess the framework
> (scripts to handle the update proces) would surely make their
> way into the Bering uClibc distro. At this point, I'm just
> not sure if there's e
Hi Richard,
> I think that if you could justify going forward with your idea, or if
> others came on board and something independent could be done, this would
> be great. I think this is a situation where both the established free/OS
> community side of LEAF and your business, and other similar bu
Hi Troy,
I myself do not consider your concerns trivial at all. Probably many people
have the same concerns. However I find it very difficult to implement and
the main reason is resource. As far as I understand most of the LEAF
developers are volunteers and work un-paid for the project so how
Martin,
Thanks for the reply!
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Hejl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I surely see your point (at my day job, I work with many
> people where an SLA, or at least having a company to hold
> responsible is the main issue).
>
> The company I work for (http
Hi Richard,
Richard Amerman wrote:
> I'm sure that this topic is not new but it is probably one that should
> be brought up regularly incase there are new options as to how to
> address the issue.
>
> My company, and other companies I work with (and I'm very sure we are
> not alone in this) w
Hi Troy,
since you haven't received anything from any of the other "core"
developers yet (I don't really consider myself a "core developer" of
leaf, but my name is on the webpage...) I want to give you at least some
response to your valid concerns.
> Question 1:
> How do you handle security patch
Wow I am sort of surprised that no one has responded to this thread. I guess
my concerns must be trivial. I really did not want to switch away from this
distro since it has worked so well for us for so many years but my case for
keeping it seems to be getting weaker and weaker since I have noth
Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation wrote:
>>ETH0_IP=`find_first_interface_address eth0`
>
> I'm on Shorewall 2.0.10 and this is unsupported. What exactly is
> "find_first_interface_address?" A shell script? Can it be added to older
> versions of shorewall to support this?
>
It's a
Cancel the last message, I didn't read the docs accurately.
- Bob Coffman
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and m
> ETH0_IP=`find_first_interface_address eth0`
I'm on Shorewall 2.0.10 and this is unsupported. What exactly is
"find_first_interface_address?" A shell script? Can it be added to older
versions of shorewall to support this?
Thanks -
Bob Coffman
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
