Re: [leaf-user] RouterBoard 24 4-port NIC driver for Bering uClibc driver?

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 14:17 -0500, Paul Zimm wrote: Hi Paul, > will one of the drivers included with Bering work for this board? It is > a 4-port nic uses chip marked dp83815 > try natsemi.o which is included in the modules tarball (or generate your new modules.lrp via http://www.ucbering.de/cg

[leaf-user] RouterBoard 24 4-port NIC driver for Bering uClibc driver?

Where can I find a RouterBoard 24 Nic driver compiled for Bering uClibc? will one of the drivers included with Bering work for this board? It is a 4-port nic uses chip marked dp83815 Marv Horst --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk

Re: [leaf-user] Firewall testing?

Tom Eastep wrote: On Wednesday 30 November 2005 10:09, Jim Ford wrote: Now I'm all snug and cosy behind my Leaf Bering firewall (thanks to the helpful folk on this forum), I'd like to see just how secure it appears from the outside. There are various sites, some of them commercial, that give

Re: [leaf-user] Firewall testing?

On Wednesday 30 November 2005 10:09, Jim Ford wrote: > Now I'm all snug and cosy behind my Leaf Bering firewall (thanks to the > helpful folk on this forum), I'd like to see just how secure it appears > from the outside. There are various sites, some of them commercial, that > give a free firewall

[leaf-user] Firewall testing?

Now I'm all snug and cosy behind my Leaf Bering firewall (thanks to the helpful folk on this forum), I'd like to see just how secure it appears from the outside. There are various sites, some of them commercial, that give a free firewall security test. I've tried some of them and they give varyi

RE: [leaf-user] New Problem with UClibc syslinux

Charles is right. In uclibc (I am using 2.2.3) there seems to be extra stuff prepended to the kernel cmdline. Different than Bering 1.2. Also, it seems that if I use the leaf.cfg format LRP="root,config,etc,local,libc207,modules,mawk, lpthread,ipsec,libcrpto,shorwall,dnscache, dhcpd,lib

Re: [leaf-user] New Problem with UClibc syslinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tibbs, Richard wrote: | According to editpadlite, the kernel line is 253 chars... It's the actual kernel command line you have to worry about, not the line in syslinux.cfg. Check /proc/cmdline to see exactly what the kernel *THINKS* the command lin

RE: [leaf-user] New Problem with UClibc syslinux

According to editpadlite, the kernel line is 253 chars... I will read the installation guide for a change. Rick. -Original Message- From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:07 AM To: Tibbs, Richard Cc: Leaf-User (E-mail) Subject: Re: [leaf

Re: [leaf-user] New Problem with UClibc syslinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tibbs, Richard wrote: | Ah! Looks like leaf.cfg has changed from the Bering 1.2 days. | My leaf.cfg with uclibc looks like below, but I will try one like yours. | | Strange thing is the leaf.cfg packages load, while everything beyond | local in sysli

RE: [leaf-user] New Problem with UClibc syslinux

Hello Richard, > > Strange thing is the leaf.cfg packages load, while everything beyond > local in syslinux LRP= (see below) does not. Thx. Rick > That has probably something todo with the maximum line length in syslinux.cfg and why we use leaf.cfg instead :-) Eric ---

RE: [leaf-user] New Problem with UClibc syslinux

Hi! > -Original Message- > From: Tibbs, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:01 AM > To: M Lu; Leaf-User (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [leaf-user] New Problem with UClibc syslinux > > Ah! Looks like leaf.cfg has changed from the Bering 1.2 days. > My leaf.