Call me stupid, but I am running a cascade of two Leaf routers and I
would not even start to consider joining them. That said, I have been
running them on the same host lately (VMware). That is because I've run
out of old small sized boxes and everything I can get my hands on is
hugely
Erich Titl wrote:
Gordon
Gordon Bos wrote:
Call me stupid, but I am running a cascade of two Leaf routers and I
would not even start to consider joining them. That said, I have been
running them on the same host lately (VMware). That is because I've run
out of old small sized boxes
Gordon
Gordon Bos wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
Gordon
Gordon Bos wrote:
Call me stupid, but I am running a cascade of two Leaf routers and I
would not even start to consider joining them. That said, I have been
running them on the same host lately (VMware). That is because I've run
out
Hey, openntpd failed to start with PC Engines' alix2d1 MB on startup/reboot? Is
this because the MB doesn't have a RTC battery? Ref:
http://www.pcengines.ch/alix2d1.htm
Thanks,
Kwon
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the
On 8/3/2009 08:21, Mike Noyes wrote: (from leaf.devel)
Everyone,
Erich Titl (etitl) promoted to project admin, and Jeff Newmiller
(jdnewmil) demoted to project member.
Congrats!
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the
Erich,
Call me stupid, but I am running a cascade of two Leaf routers and I
would not even start to consider joining them. That said, I have been
running them on the same host lately (VMware). That is because I've run
out of old small sized boxes and everything I can get my hands on is
Hi
n22e113 wrote:
Hey, openntpd failed to start with PC Engines' alix2d1 MB on startup/reboot?
Is this because the MB doesn't have a RTC battery?
Basically No, the missing battery just requies an initial connection to
an ntp server to initiate the system time.
Do you have a pppoe uplink? If
Gordon,
Call me stupid
Never! I'm relieved to hear that this proposed solution is running at least
one other place.
I had Leaf running on VMWare for a long time, but I moved it off of it not
because of performance issues, of which there were none, but only because I
didn't want to lose
Erich Titl (etitl) promoted to project admin, and Jeff Newmiller
For those of us on the user list only, any comment on a 2.6 branch? :)
Congratulations Erich.
- Bob
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting -
Hi
Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote:
Erich Titl (etitl) promoted to project admin, and Jeff Newmiller
For those of us on the user list only, any comment on a 2.6 branch? :)
M 2.6 is a bit fatter than 2.4, it has more recent drivers and
most of the development is
Hi Bob
Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote:
I see some emails from March of 2008 discussing some initial work on a 2.6
branch of Leaf. Can anyone tell me what came of that?
I found a scenario where a 2.6 branch is necessary. I'm trying to do
multi-ISP traffic control on
I'm considering chaining two Leaf Routers together, one to handle the
multiple ISPs and one for TC as a temporary solution,
How does this solve the 2.6 requirement?
Erich,
The basic issue is I can't use HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes in Shorewall. As a
result, I can't do both Multi-ISP and Traffic
I'm wondering how much of an issue it is to have a system that will fit on a
floppy. I would think that being able to boot off of a USB drive or a CD/USB
combo would be more pertinent today given as few machines even come with a
floppy as standard equipment anymore. USB booting would
Dave
Dillabough, Dave wrote:
I'm wondering how much of an issue it is to have a system that will fit on a
floppy. I would think that being able to boot off of a USB drive or a CD/USB
combo would be more pertinent today given as few machines even come with a
floppy as standard equipment
Dillabough, Dave wrote:
I'm wondering how much of an issue it is to have a system that will
fit on a floppy. I would think that being able to boot off of a USB
drive or a CD/USB combo would be more pertinent today given as few
machines even come with a floppy as standard equipment anymore.
Hi Erich,
How much of an issue is having write protection? I can understand that it is
better in theory but I can't think of a commercial firewall product (Cisco PIX,
Linksys, DLink etc) that does not use flash and that has any sort of write
protection. If having boot from R/O media is an
Dillabough, Dave wrote:
Hi Erich,
How much of an issue is having write protection? I can understand that it is
better in theory but I can't think of a commercial firewall product (Cisco
PIX, Linksys, DLink etc) that does not use flash and that has any sort of
write protection. If having
17 matches
Mail list logo
