Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
Heh, someone was listening. My last mail appeared in about 3 minutes. Bob -- The Sun is out, the sky is blue, it's time to drive the MR2. -- Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
On 29/03/16 11:55, Erich Titl wrote: > It just means that we are not in sync. eMail is not synced anyway:-) > Sure, but over 2 hours delay is a bit extreme :0) Bob -- The Sun is out, the sky is blue, it's time to drive the MR2.

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Bob Am 29.03.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: > KP, Erich, Bodo, > > Something weird with the list s/w, I suddenly got 8 of my list postings > appearing in one hit. > From the replies you are giving me, I have the impression that they are > being delayed somehow. > e.g. Erich asked

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
KP, Erich, Bodo, Something weird with the list s/w, I suddenly got 8 of my list postings appearing in one hit. From the replies you are giving me, I have the impression that they are being delayed somehow. e.g. Erich asked me the same that Bodo already had, suggesting a high latency

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
On 29/03/16 10:49, Erich Titl wrote: > Am 29.03.2016 um 10:42 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: >> On 29/03/16 10:31, Erich Titl wrote: >>> So this proves that the driver is correctly installed. >>> You can connect to the internal interfaces. >>> What does ip addr / ip link show? >> >> I don't follow

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Erich Titl
Am 29.03.2016 um 10:42 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: > On 29/03/16 10:31, Erich Titl wrote: >> So this proves that the driver is correctly installed. >> You can connect to the internal interfaces. >> What does ip addr / ip link show? > > I don't follow this. > > From a fresh boot: > > ip addr

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
On 29/03/16 10:31, Erich Titl wrote: > So this proves that the driver is correctly installed. > You can connect to the internal interfaces. > What does ip addr / ip link show? I don't follow this. From a fresh boot: ip addr shows only the mac address (no bound ipv4) on eth0 (eth 1 & 2 show

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Bob Am 29.03.2016 um 10:17 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: > On 29/03/16 10:07, Erich Titl wrote: >> Bad cable, speed detection, dhcp? Do you have another (working) ethernet >> interface? > > Yep, > > eth1 & eth2 are fine. > Cable not even needed, not connected to anything else (no DHCP >

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
On 29/03/16 10:07, Erich Titl wrote: > Bad cable, speed detection, dhcp? Do you have another (working) ethernet > interface? Yep, eth1 & eth2 are fine. Cable not even needed, not connected to anything else (no DHCP anywhere), but have connected to a switch with know good cable to set link - no

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Erich Titl
Am 29.03.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: > On 29/03/16 09:52, Bodo Meissner wrote:... > > I agree, except that eth0 shows furious activity when connected to a > switch, although no packets can be detected (how the switch might detect > this is another unknown, of course). This makes me

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
On 29/03/16 09:59, Erich Titl wrote: > Are the quotation marks in your interfaces file? > > ET No, I added them to delimit the statnza in the mail. Trying to make things clear in e-mail seems to backfire often :=) Cheers, Bob -- The Sun is out, the sky is blue, it's time to drive the MR2.

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Bob Am 29.03.2016 um 09:33 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: > On 29/03/16 09:13, Erich Titl wrote: ...> > Hmm, some misunderstanding here. > Ignoring any other devices or networks (i.e. the port "eth0" is only > connected to an empty switch (to give it link) OR not connected to > anything (makes no

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
On 29/03/16 09:52, Bodo Meissner wrote: > Maybe there is something else using/configuring eth0 when/after the init > script tries to set up the interface. > Are you sure you removed everything related to pppoe? Think so, but will double check > I suggest to connect a terminal program to

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bodo Meissner
Am 29.03.2016 um 09:33 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: > "auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > > address 192.168.142.1 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > broadcast 192.168.142.255 > gateway 192.168.142.254 > " > > is not setting the ipv4 address on eth0 > > (i.e.

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
On 29/03/16 09:13, Erich Titl wrote: > If it is not connected to the Fritz, what does it communicate with. I > was assuming that your Fritz box is your internet device. > Hmm, some misunderstanding here. Ignoring any other devices or networks (i.e. the port "eth0" is only connected to an empty

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Bob Am 29.03.2016 um 09:09 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: > On 28/03/16 23:33, Bodo Meissner wrote: >> Am 26.03.2016 um 19:52 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: >> >>> My LEAF box >> [...] >>> (I'll put it behind the Fritz Box to do proper firewalling). >> [...] >>> iface eth0 inet static >>> >>>

Re: [leaf-user] Can't reconfigure my LEAF-WRAP box

2016-03-29 Thread Bob von Knobloch
On 28/03/16 23:33, Bodo Meissner wrote: > Am 26.03.2016 um 19:52 schrieb Bob von Knobloch: > >> My LEAF box > [...] >> (I'll put it behind the Fritz Box to do proper firewalling). > [...] >> iface eth0 inet static >> >>address 192.168.142.1 > > Hello Bob, > > does this address match