Am 23.09.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>
>> Le 23 sept. 2016 à 07:36, Erich Titl a écrit :
>>
>> Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
>>> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>> ...
>>>
>>> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch
> Le 23 sept. 2016 à 07:36, Erich Titl a écrit :
>
> Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>>>
> ...
>>
>> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies,
>> often they do not and I don't know
Hi.
Why resolv.conf is missing in that case?
On 23.09.2016 14:36, Erich Titl wrote:
> Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
> ...
>> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies,
>> often they do not and I don't
Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>>
...
>
> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies,
> often they do not and I don't know if dnsmasq does. The drawback of the
> bazaar model often is the lack of precise
Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>
...>
> Erich, I still would like to know, what we should do about the dnsmasq/dhcpcd
> apparent dichotomy… Is that problem important enough to justify going
> further, like contacting the author, or fixing it on our own ? Just your
> thoughts
On 22.09.2016 21:20, Jean-Roch Blais wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>> Le 22 sept. 2016 à 13:53, Andrew a écrit :
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> On 22.09.2016 20:32, Jean-Roch Blais wrote:
>>> Hello Andrew, Erich !
Le 21 sept. 2016 à 04:52, Andrew a écrit :
Most of