Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-23 Thread Erich Titl
Am 23.09.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: > >> Le 23 sept. 2016 à 07:36, Erich Titl a écrit : >> >> Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl: >>> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: >> ... >>> >>> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-23 Thread Jean-Roch Blais
> Le 23 sept. 2016 à 07:36, Erich Titl a écrit : > > Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: >>> > ... >> >> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies, >> often they do not and I don't know

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-23 Thread Andrew
Hi. Why resolv.conf is missing in that case? On 23.09.2016 14:36, Erich Titl wrote: > Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: > ... >> As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies, >> often they do not and I don't

Re: [leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC) (update)

2016-09-23 Thread Erich Titl
Am 23.09.2016 um 10:13 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: >> ... > > As I said previously a daemon process _should_ watch its dependencies, > often they do not and I don't know if dnsmasq does. The drawback of the > bazaar model often is the lack of precise

[leaf-user] dhcpd/dnsmasq (was Re: watchdog timer on BUC)

2016-09-23 Thread Erich Titl
Am 23.09.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: > ...> > Erich, I still would like to know, what we should do about the dnsmasq/dhcpcd > apparent dichotomy… Is that problem important enough to justify going > further, like contacting the author, or fixing it on our own ? Just your > thoughts

Re: [leaf-user] watchdog timer on BUC

2016-09-23 Thread Andrew
On 22.09.2016 21:20, Jean-Roch Blais wrote: > Hello Andrew, >> Le 22 sept. 2016 à 13:53, Andrew a écrit : >> >> Hi. >> >> On 22.09.2016 20:32, Jean-Roch Blais wrote: >>> Hello Andrew, Erich ! Le 21 sept. 2016 à 04:52, Andrew a écrit : Most of