Re: [leaf-user] DHCP Client TTL Too Small (ATT Broadband)

2002-06-27 Thread Steve Jeppesen
I am one of those others who is possibly encountering this also, however I am using a basic Dachstein setup. Will let you know if it works. Steve On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:24:11 -0500 Ethan Galstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sent a message to the leaf-devel list a few days back about this

Re: [leaf-user] Blocking established connections from external port 53's

2002-06-14 Thread Steve Jeppesen
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 23:25:14 -0500 Michael D. Schleif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ snip ] Let's slow down and look at this carefully. I assume that 24.118.176.137 is your external address -- right? Correct. [ snip ] Now, if you were using only attbi's dns servers that they assigned to

[leaf-user] Blocking established connections from external port 53's

2002-06-13 Thread Steve Jeppesen
I am having trouble with these established connections showing up in my viewmasq log to the point where no one on the homenetwork can connect to the Internet. The problem seemed to go away after AT$T assigned new IP's for everyone in the neighborhood, but just today it reared its ugly head

Re: [leaf-user] Help with LaBrea - is it working? (With one IP)

2002-05-05 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Here are my options for running LaBrea with only one IP; -i eth0 -l -p 8 -z -x -F /etc/LaBrea.bpf It has been while since I set it up (Thanks to Charles and Simons help) but if I remember right, the -x tells LaBrea to not capture an IP for it's use. The -F /etc/Labrea.bpf setting is just a

[Leaf-user] Active Internet connections (w/o servers) How to block these?

2002-04-09 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Help! Tonight, we lost our internet connection to the web completly. When checking out my logs on the DS cd v1.0.2 router/firewall, I found what seemed like hundreds of ESTABLISHED connections to my router from various IP numbers. Here is a very small sample of what weblet showed as Current

Re: [Leaf-user] Unused IP's with LaBrea

2002-03-03 Thread Steve Jeppesen
I have Web and ssh running so I use /usr/sbin/LaBrea -i eth0 -l -v -p 8 -z -x -F /etc/LaBrea.bpf You will want to watch your ramdisk (or maybe you have taken care of this another way?) using the -v option will cause your ramdisk to fill up very quickly. with LaBrea.bpf containing:

Re: [Leaf-user] Will LaBrea work with dynamic IP addresses?

2002-02-28 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Yes, I have disabled or rather stopped logging hits to port 80. That was the first thing I did Saturday after my logs were multipling like rabbits and I had to do something to slow them down! Steve On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 00:34:34 -0500 Simon Bolduc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve, I long ago

Re: [Leaf-user] Will LaBrea work with dynamic IP addresses?

2002-02-27 Thread Steve Jeppesen
I have to say - Simon, along with Charles posted on the list about a week ago and this is how I set mine up last week. I did pretty much the same thing Simon posted, except I took out the v (Verbosely log activity to syslog) out of the OPTIONS= and I disabled logging on port 80 - My ramdisk was

Re: [Leaf-user] Morpheus?

2002-02-26 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Thanks for the info, I feel better now! Steve On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 06:10:29 + (GMT) Scott C. Best [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve: The Morpheus homepage (www.MusicCity.com) has a snippet addressing this rumor. Still nervous? Not nearly enough:

Re: [Leaf-user] Morpheus?

2002-02-25 Thread Steve Jeppesen
] wrote: Steve Jeppesen wrote: if you find a way to safely use it let me know. It's safe and secure. Both of my daughters use it and I am a bit worried after reading what can happen, ie; ppl have the ability to connect to your hard drive and go from there. What are you

Re: [Leaf-user] Morpheus?

2002-02-24 Thread Steve Jeppesen
if you find a way to safely use it let me know. Both of my daughters use it and I am a bit worried after reading what can happen, ie; ppl have the ability to connect to your hard drive and go from there. Other than that, they both can connect to it ok, and I am using Dachstein CD v1.0.2 On

Re: [Leaf-user] Unused IP's with LaBrea (LaBrea is running!)

2002-02-23 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Ok, so far things look good. I have started up LaBrea (and will post the steps I took to get there using just one IP) and it looks like it has already tarpitted two poor sob IP's. One last question, when I ran svi LaBrea start I received the following msg; Starting LaBrea Tarpitifconfig: not

Re: [Leaf-user] Unused IP's with LaBrea (LaBrea is running!)

2002-02-23 Thread Steve Jeppesen
I thought the line in /etc/init.d/LaBrea that reads ifconfig eth0 promisc should have been changed to ifconfig eth0 -promisc to disable promisc mode takes care of that? Or do I have to still load ifconfig.lrp and change the init script for ifconfig to not put eth0 into promisc mode? Working so

Re: [Leaf-user] Angry and venting...

2002-02-22 Thread Steve Jeppesen
I had basically the same problem WITH Road Runner. For over a week, portsentry reported attackalerts for three separate IP's from Road Runner - blocked them - and yet one of those IP's kept coming back as evident from my logs. I sent three separate emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no response

Re: [Leaf-user] Unused IP's with LaBrea

2002-02-19 Thread Steve Jeppesen
So far I have a good grasp as to whats going on with the help you and Charles have given. This coming weekend when everybody in the house will not be on the net, I will load up LaBrea and give it a whirl. Charles' script is much neater than mine - I guess me writing a kludge made him write

Re: [Leaf-user] port 53 flooding my log

2002-02-18 Thread Steve Jeppesen
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 21:00:58 -0500 Mike Sussman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have observed several other port 53 floods. Am I the only one? tcp_128.121.10.146_53 tcp_128.242.105.34_53 tcp_129.250.244.10_53 tcp_203.81.45.254_53 tcp_209.157.68.18_53 tcp_213.38.75.193_53 No, you are not the

[Leaf-user] Unused IP's with LaBrea

2002-02-17 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Good Day all, I am wondering what could I use as a unused IP for LaBrea? Is it possible to use a class C number ie; 192.168.x.x? I only receive one IP from AT$T to connect to the net, so I was thinking maybe I could hook up a spare computer to the network behind the LRP (DCD v1.0.2) box, and

Re: [Leaf-user] Unused IP's with LaBrea

2002-02-17 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Thank you for your suggestions Charles. I think I will take the easy way on this and just add an extra computer on the internal side and go with port forwarding, I think I want to stay on the good side of the neighbors! LOL If you want to run LaBrea using a private space IP, you'll probably

[Leaf-user] How to unload dnyports.lrp without rebooting

2002-02-05 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Help! I am using DCD 1.0.2 and have been trying to configure dnyports.lrp for my system. Now I have three separate instances of dnyports running! I have not backed-up my Dachstein configuration on purpose (after installing dynports.lrp) so I could revert back to my original configuration,

[Leaf-user] logging options for sshd 3.0p1

2002-01-29 Thread Steve Jeppesen
I need some help in trying to configure what gets logged when using sshd 3.0p1 An older version I used with ESB2 used to log connections, attempted connections and when a connection closed out or was terminated. This version I am using with DCD 1.0.2 only logs when a connection is made, not

RE: [Leaf-user] Dach Floppy

2002-01-11 Thread Steve Jeppesen
I have not seen where it was mentioned yet (nor do I know if it is required) but I thought that libz had to be loaded before sshd. Just a newbies two cents worth! Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,

RE: [Leaf-user] EigerStein2BETA / Dachstein Guides

2002-01-08 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Is there a difference in time it takes a mailing to get posted to leaf-user compared to leaf-announce? Noticed this message is posted on leaf-user, but nothing yet at leaf-announce. If you could please, post your web address (new address? old one still seems to be down) here concerning the

RE: [Leaf-user] ISP e-mail access help *desperate*

2002-01-08 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Forgive me if I am still off-track, but it sounds as if you want your Windows clients to be able to send and receive email to and from your ISP (thru your Dachstein server) NOT from your Dachstein server. If that is the case then simply just add those SMTP and pop addresses into your Windows

RE: [Leaf-user] ISP e-mail access help *desperate*

2002-01-08 Thread Steve Jeppesen
/receive email. Glad to be of some help. My turn to give some instead of always asking! Steve -Original Message- From: Stewart Adey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:52 PM To: Steve Jeppesen Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] ISP e-mail access help *desperate* Oh, man

[Leaf-user] configure POSIXness scripts/mail script in Dachstein V1.0.2 to send mail

2002-01-06 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Is there another file besides /etc/POSIXness.conf and /etc/lrp.conf that I would modify in order to receive alerts concerning the firewall? I have been able to send a test email from the router by using this; mail -s test [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/log/syslog however I have not received any actual

RE: [Leaf-user] configure POSIXness scripts/mail script in Dachstein V1.0.2 to send mail

2002-01-06 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Thank you for the info Paul. I have read thru those articles and have successfully configured my router to send environment variables thru email. Since then, I deleted that statement out of my /etc/multicron-p! ;) Do not need those types of messages every 15 mins LOL Just curious, is it

RE: [Leaf-user] Linux kernel IP masquerading vulnerability possible in Dachstein CD V1.0.2?

2002-01-03 Thread Steve Jeppesen
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:12 PM To: Steve Jeppesen; Leaf-User Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Linux kernel IP masquerading vulnerability possible in Dachstein CD V1.0.2? At 2002-01-01 17:52 -0600, Steve Jeppesen wrote: BTW, does anybody know where there might be a link to search

[Leaf-user] Linux kernel IP masquerading vulnerability possible in Dachstein CD V1.0.2?

2002-01-01 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Just curious, I was reading up on www.pigtail.net/LRP and found he posted something about this vulnerability. Is this a problem with Dachstein? I am using the kernel 2.2.19 without any mod to IP masq. Here is the link which states the issue (which sort of makes it sound like Dachstein is also

RE: [Leaf-user] Network Card Problem

2001-12-31 Thread Steve Jeppesen
Patrick, For the last two LRP upgrades I have had to resort to using an older, but workable 3c59x.o module. Originally I started out with EigerStein, then went on to EigersteinBETA, and now I am using Dachstein CD V1.0.2 (forgive me on not stating what version I was using on the previous

RE: [Leaf-user] Sending email alerts with Dachstein CD V1.0.2

2001-12-30 Thread Steve Jeppesen
to send to mail server. If blank, `hostname -f` is used. MAIL_DOMAIN=mnmai05.mn.mediaone.net Thanks again for your help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael D. Schleif Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 10:12 AM To: Steve Jeppesen Cc

RE: [Leaf-user] Sending email alerts with Dachstein CD V1.0.2

2001-12-30 Thread Steve Jeppesen
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Jeppesen Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] Sending email alerts with Dachstein CD V1.0.2 Thanks for the clue Michael, that worked! However, when the test email comes thru