[Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

OK, we have successfully built a couple DCD-DCD tunnels. We are still learning how to get full windoze functionality across the tunnels. Is it possible for a w2k-pro box to join (first time) a domain on a w2k-adv-svr across this tunnel? Now, we are tasked to carry this further and we have seve

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

> OK, we have successfully built a couple DCD-DCD tunnels. We are still > learning how to get full windoze functionality across the tunnels. Is > it possible for a w2k-pro box to join (first time) a domain on a > w2k-adv-svr across this tunnel? Hmm...I think so. You'll probably need to make su

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

On Friday 25 January 2002 09:07, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > OK, we have successfully built a couple DCD-DCD tunnels. We are > > still learning how to get full windoze functionality across the > > tunnels. Is it possible for a w2k-pro box to join (first time) a > > domain on a w2k-adv-svr ac

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > OK, we have successfully built a couple DCD-DCD tunnels. We are still > learning how to get full windoze functionality across the tunnels. Is > it possible for a w2k-pro box to join (first time) a domain on a > w2k-adv-svr across this tunnel? > > Now, we are ta

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

On Monday 28 January 2002 22:17, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > We put a wins server on one side; but, that did not make windoze all > of that windoze functionality possible. > > So, we blew away that wins server and put samba (nmb-207.lrp) on each > gateway. It's taken some tweaking and reading ma

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

> So, we blew away that wins server and put samba (nmb-207.lrp) on each > gateway. It's taken some tweaking and reading man smb.conf > . > > Still, windoze functionality is severely lacking across the wan! > > Do the samba servers need to commu

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > > So, we blew away that wins server and put samba (nmb-207.lrp) on each > > gateway. It's taken some tweaking and reading man smb.conf > > . > > > > Still, windoze functionality is severely lacking across the w

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

gards, Roger McClurg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:28:04 -0600 From: "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: mds resource To: Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: LEAF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This sounds like the problem I was having with SNMP data. The packets vent > out the VPN with the source address of the external interface not the > internal. The solution was to modify the _updown script to include the > source address in the route command, or you c

Re: [Leaf-user] DCD, ipsec, gateways & road warriors ???

> > > Do the samba servers need to communicate with each other? If so, the > > > DCD gateways cannot ping each other, because they are concurrent with > > > the gateway itself -- although, from anywhere else on the remote > > > network, we can ping the opposite gateway by private address. > > > >