Hi scott,
> In terms of LEAF as a non-shorewall router, etc I'd propose that since
> the default LEAF distro includes shorewall that might tip the scales in
> favour of recognizing that shorewall rules are the better, *single*
> place for IP restrictions to be placed. Also, newbies (the people mos
Hello Scott,
>> It is possible to remove the dependency, but there is a reason why
>> p9100 (and a few other packages) are compiled with libwrap support. LEAF
>> is modular, so it is possible to use LEAF without shorewall as a pure
>> router or printserver (or whatever), libwrap gives some extra s
Eric Spakman wrote:
To the package maintainer:
- is it possible to remove the dependency on /etc/hosts.allow since
it would seem to be redundant with shorewall rules?
It is possible to remove the dependency, but there is a reason why p9100
(and a few other packages) are compiled with libwra
Hello Hillel,
>> It is possible to remove the dependency, but there is a reason why
>> p9100 (and a few other packages) are compiled with libwrap support. LEAF
>> is modular, so it is possible to use LEAF without shorewall as a pure
>> router or printserver (or whatever), libwrap gives some extra
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 10:31:18 +0200 (CEST), Eric Spakman wrote
>
> > I think I might know what's rankling you here, since I think that I just
> > finally figured it out myself.
> >
> > It would seem that any IP addresses that want to access the P9100
> > service need to be granted permission via: /e
Hello Sam,
> I have just installed bering uclibc 2.4, as a replacement for
> 1.something(?3?).
> Nice work everyone! Especially shorewall, I haven't looked there for a
> year or so. The macro and action parts is v.nice indeed. I did:
>
>
> - print out all the files,
> - think about what they coul
I have just installed bering uclibc 2.4, as a replacement for 1.something (?3?).
Nice work everyone! Especially shorewall, I haven't looked there for a
year or so. The macro and action parts is v.nice indeed.
I did:
print out all the files,
think about what they could mean and
type in some
Hello Scott,
> I think I might know what's rankling you here, since I think that I just
> finally figured it out myself.
>
> It would seem that any IP addresses that want to access the P9100
> service need to be granted permission via: /etc/hosts.allow
> ?!?!?!?!
>
Correct, p9100nd is compiled wit
I think I might know what's rankling you here, since I think that I just
finally figured it out myself.
It would seem that any IP addresses that want to access the P9100
service need to be granted permission via:
/etc/hosts.allow
?!?!?!?!
Anyway, togging my IP address in that file enables/
