PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jonathan
French
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Eric B Kiser; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Double Private Network / FreeS/WAN problem
Hm, just for reference, my original problem was a machine behind
, so I just haven't spent any time on it.
Jonathan French [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/21/2002 06:08:37 PM
To: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx@Nlynx
cc: Eric B Kiser [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Double Private Network / FreeS/WAN problem
Hm, just for reference
Howdy,
I've been setting up a VPN. One of my clients has a Charter Pipeline
internet connection at home, and wants to communicate with the LEAF box
at his work via FreeS/WAN. I got him a D-Link firewall box to stick
between his cable modem and his computer as an added layer of security.
Then
, they say, and are working on it,
NATable, but it is really designed
as a point to point tunnel, with subnets behind the endpoints.
Jonathan French [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/21/2002 12:13:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx)
Subject: [leaf-user] Double Private
.
Eric B Kiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/21/2002 03:12:27 PM
To: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx@Nlynx
cc:
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Double Private Network / FreeS/WAN problem
Whoa there,
I am running a NAT'd client that connects via IPsec through my Bering
Firewall everyday.
NT4.0 box w/IPsec clnt
:12:27 PM
To: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx@Nlynx
cc:
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Double Private Network / FreeS/WAN problem
Whoa there,
I am running a NAT'd client that connects via IPsec through my Bering
Firewall everyday.
NT4.0 box w/IPsec clnt Bering doin NAT Internet IPsec
