(Sorry Izzy, I hit Reply and not Reply-All.)
On 2/25/07, Izzy Blacklock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are you using to download? Do you maybe have ports that need to be
forwarded to your laptop when it's behind the router?
This is HTTP or FTP traffic. BitTorrent traffic seems to be equally
(Sorry, Eric. I hit Reply and not Reply-All.)
On 2/25/07, Eric Spakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be a duplex mismatch, you can check the link errors with 'ip -s
link'
I looked up a bit about duplexing and this NIC after a friend suggested that.
Here's what I get from that command:
3:
Hi Andrew,
(Sorry, Eric. I hit Reply and not Reply-All.)
On 2/25/07, Eric Spakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be a duplex mismatch, you can check the link errors with 'ip -s
link'
I looked up a bit about duplexing and this NIC after a friend suggested that.
Here's what I get from that
Andrew Haninger wrote:
I don't think I explained the different IP well enough. I get
assigned an from a completely different range IP and also a different
gateway:
Slow LEAF box:
Snip!
71.72.x.x/22 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 71.72.x.x
default via 71.72.96.1 dev eth0
On 2/25/07, George Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is almost certainly an issue of half vs. full duplex. The only
reason a hub would cause a problem is if you were using a hub to connect
the router and the cablemodem. If the cablemodem is directly connected
to the LEAF box, you should have
Andrew Haninger wrote:
On 2/25/07, George Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is almost certainly an issue of half vs. full duplex. The only
reason a hub would cause a problem is if you were using a hub to connect
the router and the cablemodem. If the cablemodem is directly connected
to
On 2/25/07, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George is correct. I saw a similar issue with my business's switch. It
was set to force 100M Full duplex and the cards on the machines were set
to auto. They weren't switching to Full Duplex so while everything
worked, it was slow and very heavy
