Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 14:14 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Patrick
>
> At 13:34 23.09.2004 +0200, Patrick Benson wrote:
> >Erich Titl wrote:
> >> Hi everybody
> >>
> >> Networks 83.0.0.0 and 84.0.0.0 have been assigned to RIPE last
> >> year. In my version (1.4.8) of shorewall these networks are
Erich Titl wrote:
>
> Hi everybody
>
> Networks 83.0.0.0 and 84.0.0.0 have been assigned to RIPE last year. In my version
> (1.4.8) of shorewall these networks are still blocked by the rfc1918 rules. It it
> probably worthwhile to remove these two networks from /etc/shorewall/rfc1918 if they
>
On Thursday 23 September 2004 05:14, Erich Titl wrote:
> Patrick
>
> At 13:34 23.09.2004 +0200, Patrick Benson wrote:
> >Erich Titl wrote:
> >> Hi everybody
> >>
> >> Networks 83.0.0.0 and 84.0.0.0 have been assigned to RIPE last year. In
> >> my version (1.4.8) of shorewall these networks are stil
Patrick
At 13:34 23.09.2004 +0200, Patrick Benson wrote:
>Erich Titl wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody
>>
>> Networks 83.0.0.0 and 84.0.0.0 have been assigned to RIPE last year. In my version
>> (1.4.8) of shorewall these networks are still blocked by the rfc1918 rules. It it
>> probably worthwhile to
>
> No. The updated version:
>
> 71.0.0.0/8 logdrop # Reserved
> 72.0.0.0/5 logdrop # Reserved
> 89.0.0.0/8 logdrop # Reserved
> 90.0.0.0/7 logdrop # Reserved
>
> -Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Erich Titl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROT
Hi everybody
Networks 83.0.0.0 and 84.0.0.0 have been assigned to RIPE last year. In my version
(1.4.8) of shorewall these networks are still blocked by the rfc1918 rules. It it
probably worthwhile to remove these two networks from /etc/shorewall/rfc1918 if they
should still be there.
cheers
E
