On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't figure out how to handle this:
My external interface,eth0, has two addresses:
(all addresses fake.)
2.2.2.5 - The true public address as seen by the Internet.
3.3.3.50 - An address on an intranet lan
The default gateway is
I share some of Jeff's uncertainty about what you are doing (the vitals
from the SR FAQ really would help, as always), but my *guesses* about what
you mean take me in a bit of a different direction.
When you say My external interface,eth0, has two addresses ... *how*
did you do this? The
I cc'd the LEAF list with this reply.
At 12:41 PM 10/31/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you define a virtual interface, :0.
This would definitely solve the problem.
The correct name for this is IP Aliasing, BTW, and it requires a kernel
module to work. I haven't actually done it
-user] Weird NAT/routing problem. (fwd)
I cc'd the LEAF list with this reply.
At 12:41 PM 10/31/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you define a virtual interface, :0.
This would definitely solve the problem.
The correct name for this is IP Aliasing, BTW, and it requires a kernel
module
WELL, this raises a question:
I have, for a year, been adding address to eth0
without creating an alias/virtual device.
The purpose for the extra addresses has been to
forward them to DMZ servers, and it seems to work fine.
---
This
At 02:24 PM 10/31/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WELL, this raises a question:
I have, for a year, been adding address to eth0
without creating an alias/virtual device.
The purpose for the extra addresses has been to
forward them to DMZ servers, and it seems to work fine.
First ...
]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Weird NAT/routing problem. (fwd)
At 02:24 PM 10/31/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WELL, this raises a question:
I have, for a year, been adding address to eth0
without creating an alias/virtual device.
The purpose for the extra addresses has been to
forward
