John Mullan wrote:
OK Charles. I understand. As you know by now, I only really do this stuff
at home. I have helped a buddy by putting a LEAF router at his office.
So, not being the guru and not having a great amount of time, I will
eventually read bits and pieces.
I only ended up with Win2K
: [leaf-user] Win2K and LEAF
John Mullan wrote:
OK Charles. I understand. As you know by now, I only really do this
stuff
at home. I have helped a buddy by putting a LEAF router at his office.
So, not being the guru and not having a great amount of time, I will
eventually read bits
hosts?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: February 8, 2003 10:26 PM
To: John Mullan
Cc: Leaf-User
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Win2K and LEAF
John Mullan wrote:
OK. I did my research and found that Win2K Server 'Active
OK. I did my research and found that Win2K Server 'Active Directory'
requires and DNS server with active/dynamic record keeping. My DNS is
TinyDNS on my LEAF box. TinyDNS does not register computer names (ie;
mullan2 = mullan2.mullan.ca). When the Win2K box boots up, it takes 5-10
minutes to
.mullan.ca). When the Win2K box boots up, it takes 5-10
minutes to figure this out.
Can anyone share with me a good way to make these two boxes co-exist
peacefully? IE; Make my private TinyDNS dynamic (probably not) or to make
the Win2K box forget about the DNS problem?
Search the leaf-user
John Mullan wrote:
OK. I did my research and found that Win2K Server 'Active Directory'
requires and DNS server with active/dynamic record keeping. My DNS is
TinyDNS on my LEAF box. TinyDNS does not register computer names (ie;
mullan2 = mullan2.mullan.ca). When the Win2K box boots up, it
On Saturday 08 February 2003 09:26 pm, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
BTW: Can you tell I just had a junior network admin replace a failed NT
domain controller with 2KServer (with Active Directory installed)
because it has to be better than NT, and we'll have to upgrade someday
anyway, right?!?.
