RE: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-05 Thread Sandro Minola
Kim: Yes it is possible to use more than one classifier. Absolutely no problem. If you are interested in examples how to filter ACK and other special TCP packets with u32, please have a look at the script contained in the .lrp package mentioned below. Omar: Is it possible to accomplish traffic

Re: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-05 Thread Omar D. Samuels
05, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: RE: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping Kim: Yes it is possible to use more than one classifier. Absolutely no problem. If you are interested in examples how to filter ACK and other special TCP packets with u32, please have a look at the script contained

RE: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-05 Thread Todd Pearsall
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandro Minola Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:45 AM To: Omar D. Samuels; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kim Oppalfens Subject: RE: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping Kim: Yes it is possible to use more than one classifier. Absolutely no problem. If you are interested

Re: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-05 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Todd Pearsall wrote: I just gave it a try on my Dachstein 1.02 box (after switching from the small-ipsec to the normal-ipsec kernel file) and I get errors because the tc command is not there. Anyone know where I can get it from? bwidth22.lrp -- Best Regards, mds mds resource

Re: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-05 Thread Kim Oppalfens
At 22:08 5/06/2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote: Todd Pearsall wrote: or tc.lrp which can be found in the bering image. Kim Oppalfens I just gave it a try on my Dachstein 1.02 box (after switching from the small-ipsec to the normal-ipsec kernel file) and I get errors because the tc

[leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-04 Thread Kim Oppalfens
Hi all, I am trying to do some traffic shaping and it appears to be working. Just have one question though, would it be possible to mix fwmark filter with the u32 ones? u32 seems easier for complex rules like filtering on ack/syn/ size of data packet and so on. Thanks in advance Kim

Re: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-04 Thread Omar D. Samuels
Is it possible to accomplish traffic shaping with Dachstein? - Original Message - From: Kim Oppalfens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:13 PM Subject: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping Hi all, I am trying to do some traffic shaping

Re: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-04 Thread Tom Eastep
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Kim Oppalfens wrote: Hi all, I am trying to do some traffic shaping and it appears to be working. Just have one question though, would it be possible to mix fwmark filter with the u32 ones? u32 seems easier for complex rules like filtering on ack/syn/ size of data

Re: [leaf-user] bering (shorewall) traffic shaping

2002-06-04 Thread Richard Doyle
I suspect you can, but you are most likely to get knowledgeable help on the LARTC list: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc -Richard On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 11:13, Kim Oppalfens wrote: Hi all, I am trying to do some traffic shaping and it appears to be working. Just have one