Hello list, sorry for the hard to read previous post ...
I've been using leaf firewall for years now. I'm using standard pentium IV
motherboards with 2 nics, boot from a USB key and this is my leaf.cfg packages:
# List of packages to load
LRP="root license local bbnameif dhcpcd keyboard shorwall
Hi Jean-Roch
Am 18.09.2016 um 22:55 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
> Hello list, sorry for the hard to read previous post ...
>
...
>
> I can also use the original BUC 5.2.5 dhcpcd.lrp but I have to add in
> /etc/default/local.start:
>
> sleep 5
> dnsmasq
>
> and it works again !
>
> facinating
Hello Erich,
thank's for your answer, I commented out background in dhcpcd.conf and voila !
it works as before, great ! , here is the daemon.log: (I changed my IP address
.111)
Sep 19 13:16:43 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: version 6.7.1 starting
Sep 19 13:16:43 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: eth0: soliciti
Hi Jean-Roch
Am 19.09.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
> Hello Erich,
>
> thank's for your answer, I commented out background in dhcpcd.conf and voila
> ! it works as before, great ! , here is the daemon.log: (I changed my IP
> address .111)
Very well. We have to think about implication
Hi.
On 20.09.2016 02:29, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Jean-Roch
>
> Am 19.09.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>> Hello Erich,
>>
>> thank's for your answer, I commented out background in dhcpcd.conf and voila
>> ! it works as before, great ! , here is the daemon.log: (I changed my IP
>> address
Hi
Am 20.09.2016 um 08:53 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
...
>> I _believe_ the behaviour of dnsmasq is the problem here. The timing of
>> dhcp is not deterministic and whoever relies on data from a different
>> job needs to check the status of this prerequisite.
> And even more, I think that it'll be a t
Hello again,
> Le 20 sept. 2016 à 02:53, Andrew a écrit :
>
> Hi.
>
> On 20.09.2016 02:29, Erich Titl wrote:
>> Hi Jean-Roch
>>
>> Am 19.09.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais:
>>> Hello Erich,
>>>
>>> thank's for your answer, I commented out background in dhcpcd.conf and
>>> voila ! it wo
> Le 20 sept. 2016 à 14:59, Jean-Roch Blais a écrit :
>
> Hello again,
>
>> m also glad it works for me, :-), thank you, but if there is a latent
>> problem with apparently dnsmasq, shouldn’t a regression like that be
>> reported to the maintainer/creator/author ?
> It use to work quite well