On Friday 30 August 2002 10:29, Craig wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I want to make sure that I understand this conversation- Are you
> saying that to use IPSec functionality you really don't even need to
> use the IPSec.lrp package...that all you really need is the
> IPSec509.lrp???
For Chad Carr's script
Hi folks,
> I want to make sure that I understand this conversation- Are you
saying
> that to use IPSec functionality you really don't even need to use the
> IPSec.lrp package...that all you really need is the IPSec509.lrp???
>
YES. if and only if you are usin Bering ipsec packages (1.97 or 1.98
Hi folks,
I want to make sure that I understand this conversation- Are you saying
that to use IPSec functionality you really don't even need to use the
IPSec.lrp package...that all you really need is the IPSec509.lrp???
Craig
---
This sf.net
had the same problem.
-Original Message-
From: guitarlynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] ipsec509 packages configuration
On Friday 30 August 2002 04:34, Ronny Aasen wrote:
> is there any partiqular reason
> is there any partiqular reason why i don't find a ipsec entry under
the
> lrcfg packagemanegement when using ipsec509.lrp from this location ?
>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/update/freeswan-1.98b/
>
> i thought that ipsec509.lrp under bering don't require ipsec.lrp ?
>
No par
On Friday 30 August 2002 04:34, Ronny Aasen wrote:
> is there any partiqular reason why i don't find a ipsec entry under
> the lrcfg packagemanegement when using ipsec509.lrp from this
> location ?
>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/update/freeswan-1.98b/
>
> i thought that ipsec50
On 30 Aug 2002 11:34:12 +0200
"Ronny Aasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any partiqular reason why i don't find a ipsec entry under the
> lrcfg packagemanegement when using ipsec509.lrp from this location ?
>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/update/freeswan-1.98b/
>
>
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 14:40, Craig wrote:
> Hi Ronny,
> I think you have this backwards. From what I understand, you only need
> the IPSec.lrp and not the IPSec509.lrp unless you're planning to use
> SSH-Sentinel or the built-in Windows IPSec client, in which case you'll
> need the IPSec509.lrp to
Hi Ronny,
I think you have this backwards. From what I understand, you only need
the IPSec.lrp and not the IPSec509.lrp unless you're planning to use
SSH-Sentinel or the built-in Windows IPSec client, in which case you'll
need the IPSec509.lrp to enable x.509 certificate support. To do this,
load
is there any partiqular reason why i don't find a ipsec entry under the
lrcfg packagemanegement when using ipsec509.lrp from this location ?
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/update/freeswan-1.98b/
i thought that ipsec509.lrp under bering don't require ipsec.lrp ?
mvh
Ronny Aasen
10 matches
Mail list logo
