> On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 06:38, Peter Mueller wrote:
> > You have the right attitude, single-DES is crap.
>
> You bet it is. I cracked a 1DES key with a banana smoothie
> in a whisker over 30 minutes last week. :)
I used 5000 monkeys to crack it in 5 minutes, guess I got lucky..
> > However, i
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 06:38, Peter Mueller wrote:
> You have the right attitude, single-DES is crap.
You bet it is. I cracked a 1DES key with a banana smoothie in a whisker
over 30 minutes last week. :)
> However, ipsec.lrp does support single-DES.
Are you sure about this? There's
You have the right attitude, single-DES is crap. However, ipsec.lrp does
support single-DES. Superfreeswan includes additional encyrption algorithm
patches which Jacques includes.
RTM ;-) - http://leaf-project.org/devel/jnilo/bipack2.html
12.8. ipsec.lrp
This is the super-freeswan ipsec package
Hi M,
Yes, I thought this would be the case. I'll have to look into this, but
either way, a DES VPN is not secure, and I think I'll just tell the guys
at the remote end that they have to supply a Linux box with DES support
as I don't want to be held responsible for implementing such an insecure
V
Hi Hilton,
Bering ipsec.lrp is actually Superfreeswan 1.99.6.2, and I believe that
FreeSWAN does not support single DES.
M Lu.
From: Hilton Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] ipsec.lrp - does it do plain old DES?
Date: 06 Jul 2003
