On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 18:16, Tony wrote:
I have a few questions regarding this...
Now, if I have this figured correctly, the bridge is transparent to your
ISP, so you would need another host behind the bridge to have an
address, correct? The use I have in mind would be statically
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the weekend I setup Bering as a Bridge and used shorewall version 2.0 (from
www.shorewall.net) for the firewall. As I didn't find out all the steps from
the documentation online I thought I would send this message so others would
have an easier time setting it up.
Quoting Tom Eastep [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the weekend I setup Bering as a Bridge and used shorewall version 2.0
(from
www.shorewall.net) for the firewall. As I didn't find out all the steps
from
the documentation online I thought I would send this message so
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see I misread the shorewall requirement line on that page. What extra does
full bridge functionaliy give?
I don't completely understand how briding works, just how I made it work with
shorewall and bering. The bering user guide said that
I have a few questions regarding this...
Now, if I have this figured correctly, the bridge is transparent to your
ISP, so you would need another host behind the bridge to have an
address, correct? The use I have in mind would be statically assigned.
Also, I would expect the bridge still to
I had bridgeing working with shorewall 1.?? and Bering-uClibc (something)
about a year ago, when I was too stingy to buy a switch. (P90 + 2 ISA NE2000
compatible cards for the lan plus a dialup modem to the internet)
I ended up just replacing ppp0 in all the shorewall config files with br0
and
