Support Requests item #668950, was opened at 2003-01-16 09:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=668950&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mathias Leinmueller (mleinmueller)
Assi
Hi all
I just noticed that the 2.4. Kernel shipped with Bering does add a conntrack
entry for each routed connection. Please note that I really mean plain
routing, NOT NAT/MASQ'ing.
This router is a 21Port (100Mbit) with ~200 clients. This router is NOT
going to be used to connect these ~200 clien
> What does the value 32768 mean? Max. size of the conntrack table
> in bytes? Max. # of entries in the table?
I just found out that this value means the number (#) of connections. And
it's currently not set to 32768 (as I misleadingly wrote), it's set to
32760.
http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jns/security
Does anyone have a Bering image with ide support
included in it ? My target hardware doesn't have a
floppy drive or cdrom and I do not have any real linux
machines. I use VMWare to do any linux related work
and unforunetly VMWare doesn't support 1.68 size
floppies. If I could get a Bering image wit
David,
I made a stock Bering image for you including ide support, I had to
remove the ppp.lrp package to get enough room. You can download it at
http://www.netvantix.com/leaf/images/bering_1_0_stable_ide.imz
Since you primarily use windoze I created the image with WinImage for
y
Roger,
Here is a quote from one of Charles's earlier posts on the subject
I don't work a lot with h323, but I think you need the following:
1) Make sure you're loading the ip_masq_h323.o module in /etc/modules
2) To be able to recieve calls, you need to port-forward some ports from
Does anybody have a current US source for the
DLink - DFE-570TX 4 port Tulip based card ? This
card doesn't seem to be made anymore, and the
inventory is drying up. Anyone using any other
4 port cards with LEAF ?
Doug
---
This SF.NET email
Hy
I´m setting up a VPN conection with ipsec.lrp. I also seen a ipsec509.lrp
module. In few words, what is the main difference between ipsec.lrp and
ipsec509.lrp?
Regards
Heriberto
Ahora podés usar Yahoo! Messenger desde tu celular. Aprendé cómo hacerlo en Yahoo!
Móvil: http://ar.mobile.ya
Hello Heriberto
> Hy
>
> I´m setting up a VPN conection with ipsec.lrp. I also seen a ipsec509.lrp
> module. In few words, what is the main difference between ipsec.lrp and
> ipsec509.lrp?
The ipsec.lrp is the freeswan package.
The ipsec509 is the same package patched for the use of
certificates t
Hi all,
I wish to know more about dhcp relay??? exist how i put a leaf (Bering more
specific) box to do the dhcp relay??? There's a package?? Or it's some
config?
Thanks! =)
Ps: With the recent advisory for dhcpd, the leaf dhcpd server is affected by
the vulnerability?? or better, what's the
Two things:
1) Is this bad or normal:
Jan 16 15:23:05 Nimrod kernel: The PCI BIOS has not enabled the device at
0/48! Updating PCI command 0003->0007.
Jan 16 15:23:05 Nimrod kernel: eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at
0xfe00, IRQ 9, 00:90:47:01:98:80.
Jan 16 15:23:05 Nimrod kernel: The PCI B
Hey, read down your post included at the bottom, and tell
me why it finds your card as an Intersil? It finds mine
as a Lucent/Agere.
When I boot my w/rc3 and the pcmcia_orinoco.lrp
that I use, called pcmcia.lrp, version 3.1.33, I see
the following in my syslog:
cardmgr[6583]: watching 2 sockets
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 05:50, Sandro Minola wrote:
> > What does the value 32768 mean? Max. size of the conntrack table
> > in bytes? Max. # of entries in the table?
> I just found out that this value means the number (#) of connections. And
> it's currently not set to 32768 (as I misleadingly wrote
On Thursday 16 January 2003 10:28 am, Sandro Minola wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just noticed that the 2.4. Kernel shipped with Bering does add a
> conntrack entry for each routed connection. Please note that I really mean
> plain routing, NOT NAT/MASQ'ing.
FYI, the 2.4/iptables does not _have_ to be set
Hello,
I get a LOT of the following in my syslog:
Jan 16 23:27:38 firewall dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.1.2 from
00:80:c6:f8:62:c6 via eth1
Jan 16 23:27:38 firewall dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.1.2 to 00:80:c6:f8:62:c6
via eth1
Jan 16 23:27:38 firewall dhcpd: send_packet: Operation not permitted
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:37 PM -0500 Arcana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Any other ideas?
Configure dhcpd to issue longer leases.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
AIM: teastep \ http://shorewall.sf.net
ICQ: #60745924 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt,
I found out what the problem was. It was caused by
memory conflict. I modified the config.opts and did a
few includes/excludes io ports and memory. It fixed
the problem right away. I couldn't locate any hardware
infomation from Lucent/Agere and I just did by trials
and errors and wathed wha
Scott Merrill wrote:
This is a long message, attempting to document the steps I took to get my
Orinoco wireless cards to work in my laptop and in my LEAF/Bering box.
Hey, funny thing, I just got 1.0 stable running my
Orinoco gold, and it cardmgr choked if I only had
the orinoco*.o modules in
wing newton wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Thank you for your help.
Hi again Newton,
I just got my Bering-1.0 up and running great w/kernel 2.4.20
and my Orinoco Gold. I started from blank diskettes and built
the system out of parts from /devel/jnilo/bering/latest/
following the Bering install guide an
> Hello,
>
> I get a LOT of the following in my syslog:
>
> Jan 16 23:27:38 firewall dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.1.2
> from=20 00:80:c6:f8:62:c6 via eth1 Jan 16 23:27:38 firewall
> dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.1.2 to 00:80:c6:f8:62:c6= =20 via
> eth1 Jan 16 23:27:38 firewall dhcpd: send_packet
wing newton wrote:
Matt,
I found out what the problem was. It was caused by
memory conflict.
...
Nice spotting that. Thank God for useful output
to the syslog and dmesg, huh?
BTW, do you know if I can use the same interface to do
both ad-hoc and managed mode concurrently ?
Never hear
I am running build 2397 on some of our routers now. I have noticed that I
cannot ping them. They do not respond to a ping. I can ping from them and
through them though.
Anyone else seen this?
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.co
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:52 PM -0800 Brock Nanson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Googling suggested that this was a firewall issue
so I played about with that for a while - finally got it to stop by
adjusting the Shorewall rules to ACCEPT UDP 67 and 68 between the Bering
box and my LAN.
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:12 PM -0800 Tom Eastep
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The correct solution is to specify the 'dhcp' in
/etc/shorewall/interfaces for the interface(s) being served by dhcpd.
I of course meant "the 'dhcp' option"
--
-Tom
--
Tom E
Ok, after some research i find the dhcrelay binary who made the job, as i
user of Slackware, and have not too much contact with Debian, so, i can't
compile ISC dhcpd to put into Bering, and my question is???
If i get dhcrelay binary from wisp release, i can put into Bering??? Someone
has do that
Le Vendredi 17 Janvier 2003 04:25, Samuel Abreu a écrit :
> Ok, after some research i find the dhcrelay binary who made the job, as i
> user of Slackware, and have not too much contact with Debian, so, i can't
> compile ISC dhcpd to put into Bering, and my question is???
You could run a Debian virt
26 matches
Mail list logo
