William McKee wrote:
>> I am not familiar with IIF format. Is it csv,xml etc? sql-ledger already
>> allows you to import invoices/payments and with minor code changes you
>> can import invoices and mark them paid.
>>
>>
> Hi Armaghan,
>
> It's the Intuit Interchange Format[1,2]. There's a
>
>
>
> If importing data from an existing system is possible, where do we
> find out about how that works?
>
Hi Tom,
I'm not really familiar with the capabilities of LSMB. I did see several
posts about migrating from Quickbooks so you may want to search the
archives.
Armaghan posted that SL
>
> I am not familiar with IIF format. Is it csv,xml etc? sql-ledger already
> allows you to import invoices/payments and with minor code changes you
> can import invoices and mark them paid.
>
Hi Armaghan,
It's the Intuit Interchange Format[1,2]. There's a Perl module that can
parse these
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 20:01 +0500, Armaghan Saqib wrote:
> Absolutely not. Chris has worked really hard and also provides
> extensive/free support on this mailing list which is as good as any
> commercial support or even better. And we are all really grateful to
> him
> (and other contributors as w
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Luke wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote:
>
>> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so)
>
> Did Chris actually say that? Â Additionally, it being open source, support
> is at the discretion of the community is it not?
>
The o
Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:50 +0500, Armaghan Saqib wrote:
>
>> Hi Luis, I can understand your position but here are few other issues:
>>
>> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so)
>> 2. LedgerSMB 1.3 (a quite different db structure) is not in
>> pr
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 02:36 -0400, Luke wrote:
>
> Did Chris actually say that? Additionally, it being open source,
> support is at the discretion of the community is it not?
That would be my expectation.
Regards
-lem
-
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:50 +0500, Armaghan Saqib wrote:
> Hi Luis, I can understand your position but here are few other issues:
>
> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so)
> 2. LedgerSMB 1.3 (a quite different db structure) is not in
> production
> yet and we don't hav
Luke wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote:
>
>> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so)
>>
> Did Chris actually say that?
Yes. I asked that question on the list. I don't remember exactly (quick
archives search could not get me that email) but he sa
> Thanks Tim.
Your welcome! I recall last year when we upgarded to Centos 5.3 and SL 2.6
we were neck deep...the Centos/Perl distribution by default compiles with
usethread.
> We found the info you kindly pointed us to before asking the question.
> In some cases, the error goes away, although it
10 matches
Mail list logo
