Re: [LU] Wolves report

2016-04-20 Thread rhys hodge
Thanks for the report Dave. Those of us overseas really look forward to these. I have enjoyed your reports throughout the season. I am ready to get shot down in flames, but Something in my gut tells me we may do something next season MOT Rhys On Wed,

Re: [LU] Wolves report

2016-04-20 Thread nat...@sky.com
No problem - generally enjoy doing them (sometimes a bit of a bind) and it is hard to get the chronology right on occasionAs for next season, I am a fan of Evans for the most part and we have had times, like second half last night, when we look more than decent. Our record against the top teams

Re: [LU] Wolves report

2016-04-20 Thread {broken-address}
I echo others comments re the reports Dave, and others - always read and appreciated, if not necessarily agreed with :-) I don't particularly trust Cellino, and therefore am dubious about the ST offers, but if it comes off then fine. The £5 on the day surcharge, or join the membership scheme fo

Re: [LU] Wolves report

2016-04-20 Thread Damian Walsh
I'm a Cellino INer which is more based on the fact that I would like him to succeed rather that I think he will succeed. It would be great to be successful and to put "our" nutter on a larger stage :) Damian ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

[LU] Prize money

2016-04-20 Thread David Brennan
I noticed we're up to 11th, follow our recent successes. So I thought that must be a worth a bit of prize money, finishing 11th rather than 15th. So I tried to find out how much each team gets in prize money per place in the league. I can't find a list anywhere, and indeed I found one thread

Re: [LU] Prize money

2016-04-20 Thread Rob Heath
I vaguely recall that there was some discussion on here a year ago about how there *was *some financial implication about whether we finished xth or yth. 100,000 quid per place maybe? ( My memory is awful!) On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:38 PM, David Brennan wrote: > I noticed we're up to 11th, follo

[LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread nat...@sky.com
Fed up reading all the negative posts on waccoe re Cellino and the new ST scheme - a lot from 'fans' who never even go to games. Twitter seems to be a lot more balanced - some thinking it is great and some being a bit more wary and less trusting of Cellino and his motives Is there anyone on here

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread Nigel Sykes
We're all so cynical these days that it's hard to trust any offer is really in our interests (did anyone see the "Duck Quacks Don't Echo" show the other week, where only 3% of people took free cash from a bloke who was giving it in the street?). But I can't help think that if they were really tryi

[LU] Mouth watering 2nd Division next year?

2016-04-20 Thread Damian Walsh
The season ticket offer is even more attractive when you consider that the second division next year could include Leeds, Aston Villa, Newcastle, Sunderland not to mantion a team managed by Clough. Cellino might regret selling extra season tickets because of the potential of quite a few matches to

Re: [LU] Mouth watering 2nd Division next year?

2016-04-20 Thread Paul Cundell
I don't think he'll regret very much if he sells 15k ST's by June tbh On 20 Apr 2016 14:42, "Damian Walsh" wrote: > > The season ticket offer is even more attractive when you consider that the > second division next year could include Leeds, Aston Villa, Newcastle, > Sunderland not to mantion a t

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread Simon McNally
I agree. I am definitely Cellino out but I think this is a good deal. Realistically we were never going to get anything better than a price freeze and like last year there's a discount for buying early. The 25% back is just a bonus. I don't agree with those who say stop giving him your money - I'm

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
It's a fabulous jesture. It deserves to succeed and if it does it will redress some bruising we've taken from Cellino. But we cannot pretend it didn't happen. On 20 Apr 2016 15:18, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > Fed up reading all the negative posts on waccoe re Cellino and the new ST > scheme - a l

Re: [LU] Wolves report

2016-04-20 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
Completely agree. He's made an offer we cannot refuse. I will renew my oversees ticket as an appreciation. Next Saturday I'll be at ER, with my brother and Thirkers. Looking forward to it now end. No matter what, Leeds United is still magic like no other. Michael On 20 Apr 2016 11:51, "nat...@sk

Re: [LU] 2-0

2016-04-20 Thread Simon McNally
Agree about Murphy - I even saw him make a tackle last night. First half an hour I don't think he had a touch. Like you say, as hard as it might be, Evans deserves credit for a much improved display. Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Apr 2016, at 07:21, Richard Walker wrote: > > Agree mate, and sa

Re: [LU] Wolves report

2016-04-20 Thread {broken-address} Nicholas Armit
Still think Rosler should have been given more time. From: {broken-address} To: "nat...@sky.com" Cc: Leeds List Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 7:38 AM Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves report I echo others comments re the reports Dave, and others - always read and appreciated, if not nec

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread Matt Anderson
Cellino is a trigger happy idiot who shouldn't be running a football club But he appears to be wealthy and he is not bates cutting cutting cuttingOr the most impoverished Arab investors of ghf I would prefer him to Ashley the glaziers etc... Until we find our Peter Coates of Stoke I'm con

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread {broken-address} Richard Walker
Amazing, seems that most on here actually don't mind him staying on? Who are all these people putting money up to create ridiculous posters / Cellino out stunts ? I don't go on Waccoe these days. > On 20 Apr 2016, at 18:08, Matt Anderson wrote: > > Cellino is a trigger happy idiot who should

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
Rich I put up money for the protests. But the jesture is impressive. And if he's here then we have to make the most of it. I'd like him out. I don't see a contradiction. On 20 Apr 2016 7:16 p.m., "Richard Walker" wrote: > Amazing, seems that most on here actually don't mind him staying on? > >

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread Matt Anderson
Better than bates, we've spent a bit of cash, not bankrupt yet but can't see how we move forward. Couldn't see how we stood still under bates though I understand those TTGM but wonder what the alternative is. Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Apr 2016, at 18:16, Richard Walker wrote: > > Amazing

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread brendan_mcwilliams
Definitely think Evans deserves to be kept on and have liked the fact that hoof ball was avoided throughout. With some key additions, it's a decent base to challenge the top 6 in earnest. Cellino on the other hand shouldn't be near the place physically ie get someone like Pearson in again to

Re: [LU] ST renewals

2016-04-20 Thread Scott1cairns1
Told you Evans was the man for the job !!! :/ Best regards,Scott. > On 20 Apr 2016, at 21:04, > wrote: > > > > Definitely think Evans deserves to be kept on and have liked the fact that > hoof ball was avoided throughout. With some key additions, it's a decent base > to challenge the top