Norwich bottled the game.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 21:46, Matt Anderson wrote:
> Not that impressed by Liverpool. They have been clinical with chances but
> it’s not like Barcelona in their prime.
>
> Yet commentators seem to think it is
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 9 Aug 2019, at 20:44,
Not that impressed by Liverpool. They have been clinical with chances but it’s
not like Barcelona in their prime.
Yet commentators seem to think it is
Sent from my iPhone
> On 9 Aug 2019, at 20:44, Richard Naef wrote:
>
>
>> Fairly pleased to have started off hammering Bristol city rather
>Fairly pleased to have started off hammering Bristol city rather than being
>Norwich right >now
Especially if you read what Stephen Warnock says about Norwich;
"Look at the way Norwich are playing out from the back. I feel they're inviting
pressure on themselves that they don't need. I
Fairly pleased to have started off hammering Bristol city rather than being
Norwich right now
Sent from my iPhone
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email
not really. £26m sales does not mean £26m profit due to player amortisation
have a read of this
http://www.mikethornton.xyz/twitter-ramblings-july-2019/?fbclid=IwAR0fXdoFrUQJ8L4Zgx90zGvtDNEbIfkaAVVyOxU0EdvwElFkSrTNT2UgK3U
> Rich N - glass always full, never mind half full.
LOL, very true Rog, actually over filled and often split down my t-shirt.
Quite some time ago I decided, that in view of some awful shit that happened in
my life, putting pointless things like kicking bladders around into
perspective, to
FFP stipulates that clubs mustn't lose more than 15m over 3 years (excluding
any dosh put in by Owners) I believe we lats 2 years we lost £4m then £15m, so
this year we have to turn that 15m loss into a 4m profit. That means we have
to find £19m, excluding any further increases in overheads.
Not sure about that. I am incredibly optimistic about the upcoming season
especially after Bristol. Saturday will tell us a bit more.
However, I really think we could be struggling if we get anything like the
injuries we had last year or White turns out to be pale imitation of Pontus.
I know
Rich W - glass always half empty, if not bordering on completely empty
from time to time.
Rich N - glass always full, never mind half full.
Makes for interesting reading, but surely reality is somewhere between
the two viewpoints?
Cheers - Rogerre
Casillas er problably one of the better we can have for that level of wages
that is able to play they way MB wants a keeper to play.
> On 9. Aug 2019, at 11:34, Joe Skinner wrote:
>
> Casillas on £35k a week, that's nuts. He's fucking shite
___
Whilst occasionally wishing we had a couple of Linekers upfront, the bottom
line is there must be a very small percentage of goals scorers willing, or
able, to put in the effort required to fit into a Bielsa team, and even less
that we can afford. I hope the young lad from Arsenal is up to it,
Casillas on £35k a week, that's nuts. He's fucking shite
-Original Message-
From: Leedslist On Behalf Of Jim Moran
Sent: 09 August 2019 10:20
To: Tim Leslie
Cc: Leeds List
Subject: Re: [LU] Graham smyth
That article alone has swung me to subscribe to The Athletic. The writing and
That article alone has swung me to subscribe to The Athletic. The writing
and detail is on another level.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 09:41, Tim Leslie wrote:
> On this occasion Rich, I think you're being a bit naive. I think the YEP
> version is a cut down of Phil Hays piece in the new Athletic
On this occasion Rich, I think you're being a bit naive. I think the YEP
version is a cut down of Phil Hays piece in the new Athletic website
(Subscription required, but I signed up on a £30 for a year option. The
writing is VERY good I think). It's clear we were over loaded with
youngsters
14 matches
Mail list logo
