Re: [LU] Oh dear AKA Trouble at Mill

2011-07-08 Thread Mark Humphries
Helps if I include the link http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/football-league/championship /8899/0/bowyer-verge-ipswich-move -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of markbu...@aol.com Sent: 08 July 2011 13:25 To

Re: [LU] Oh dear AKA Trouble at Mill

2011-07-08 Thread Mark Humphries
Wtf is going on at Ipswich?! It is one thing being outbid on wages by Stoke/Everton/Leicester.. but Ipswich too?! They have had some other high profile signings too this summer. I'm not usually a pessimist, but we definitely seem to be going backwards in terms of attracting the better players -

Re: [LU] Woodgate

2011-07-08 Thread Mark Humphries
The picture of it, or have you seen/felt it in the flesh? I like the look of it personally.. but if it wears like the old admiral "sick" kits. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Ian Murray Sent: 08 July 2011 11:15

Re: [LU] 11/12 shirt

2011-07-07 Thread Mark Humphries
Anyone notice the smaller link/pic to the new shirt on the bottom right of this link? http://www.leedsunited.com/news/20110707/see-the-new-united-kit_2247585_2387 484 Looks a bit like smudger in the background! ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and opti

Re: [LU] Leeds' arab royal family supporter

2011-06-30 Thread Mark Humphries
So he is a sadist then - might be a chance to get him to support Leeds -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Ian Murray Sent: 30 June 2011 14:20 To: Nicholas Armit Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Leeds' arab roya

Re: [LU] Targets

2011-06-28 Thread Mark Tuffey
Kilkenny and Schmeichel do NOT bother me. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/lis

Re: [LU] Kasper - view from my elder son - amused me !!

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Humphries
All joking aside I also concluded that was the only reason someone would be so keen to play out the last year of their contract. Most players will sign extended deals with 1 year on their contracts, and chuck in a release clause or something. It also might explain why a young player would only si

Re: [LU] Showing ambition

2011-06-20 Thread Mark Humphries
Dunno what you're on about there - Bowyer is the best of the lot we have been linked with in terms of the impact he would have on the side. At least we know he can still play 46 games a year. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Be

Re: [LU] Showing ambition

2011-06-20 Thread Mark Humphries
I wonder if we are actually closer to getting westwood than seems to be the case. Or Grayson is happy that Alex Cairns can step up. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Michael Benjamin. Sent: 20 June 2011 15:28 To:

[LU] Southampton Away

2011-06-17 Thread Kitching, Mark
1st Game away at Southampton MarkK Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, pl

[LU] I want you back

2011-06-16 Thread mark . aked
A couple of teams I can think of (Rangers and Crystal Palace) have had the more than one spell with the same manager. Which living (key word) Leeds manager would you have back should Larry not be there? MarkA Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device ___

Re: [LU] No need to worry about West Hams challenge ...

2011-06-15 Thread Mark Tuffey
Kevin Nolanhe's world class compared to our midfielders. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://ma

Re: [LU] No need to worry about West Hams challenge ...

2011-06-15 Thread Kitching, Mark
Let's not laugh at West Ham so soon, they've just bought Nolan, one of Newcastle's best players and top scorer last season, I'd have him as a first choice central midfielder ahead of any of ours at the moment. MarkK. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslis

Re: [LU] Leeds lose youngster to Barca

2011-06-14 Thread Mark Tuffey
Ho-humthere isn't an English club that can compete with the lure of Barcelona. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire > To: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:27:19 -0400 > From: seanscr...@aol.com > Subject: [LU] Leeds

Re: [LU] Bored (longish.)

2011-06-14 Thread Mark Tuffey
;activity and rumors". Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To uns

Re: [LU] Bored (longish.)

2011-06-14 Thread Mark Humphries
No, it must be what happens to Ian.. Alan Smith To Leeds, Massive Overdose -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Andy Ewart Sent: 14 June 2011 11:10 To: Leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Bored (longish.) ASTL = Jeff

Re: [LU] Johnson, Kilkenny and the "market rate"

2011-06-11 Thread Mark Humphries
What were Kilkenny's wage (and other contractual) demands? -Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 11 June 2011 01:13 To: Simon Hart Cc: Mark Humphries; ; Subject: Re: [LU] Johnson, Kilkenny and the "market rate" Re Kilkenny - clear

Re: [LU] Johnson, Kilkenny and the "market rate"

2011-06-11 Thread Mark Humphries
Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 10 June 2011 21:01 To: Mark Humphries Cc: ; Subject: Re: [LU] Johnson, Kilkenny and the "market rate" As has been demonstrated, 7k a week is less than we can afford, according to our published accounts. So

Re: [LU] Johnson, Kilkenny and the "market rate"

2011-06-10 Thread Mark Humphries
Of course it is negotiating. First of all, anyone with any negotiating credentials will tell you that you always have a "walk away" figure... an absolute level beyond which you will not go. 'Negotiating' is all about getting a deal either to suit yourself regardless of the other party (win-los

Re: [LU] Johnson etc.

2011-06-10 Thread Mark Tuffey
can all assess this point. I imagine Johnson will be warming the bench at Norwich while the club sits in the relegation zone and we will be flying high atop the Championship. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds Unite

Re: [LU] NON LU: broadband provider

2011-06-10 Thread Kitching, Mark
You all realise Murdoch doesn't own Sky don't you? Ernot quite yet anyway ;) -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Graham White Sent: 10 June 2011 09:01 To: Nicholas Armit; Chris Briggs Cc: LEEDSLIST Subject: Re: [LU]

Re: [LU] NON LU: broadband provider

2011-06-10 Thread Mark Humphries
Wasn’t aware the bbc did broadband. Cool. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard Naef Sent: 09 June 2011 21:50 To: 'LEEDSLIST' Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU: broadband provider you are joking aren't you Steve, do you r

Re: [LU] NON LU: broadband provider

2011-06-09 Thread Kitching, Mark
" speed and cost of broadband in your countryproceed." WellI get it free with Sky :) Get 8Mb about 1.5 miles from exchange -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas Armit Sent: 09 June 2011 17:01 To: Chris Br

Re: [LU] NON LU: broadband provider

2011-06-09 Thread Kitching, Mark
Try this : http://www.ispreview.co.uk/review/top50.php Click on the individual providers to get detailed reviews. I can recommend Aquiss personally although I don't think they're the cheapest. Mark K. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leed

Re: [LU] NON LU: broadband provider

2011-06-09 Thread Kitching, Mark
As a Sky employee I don't want to seem to be promoting Sky products, however, what is the reasoning exactly for "I am thinking I should go for these guys to avoid SKY and BT". Is there a reason you've been put off Sky and BT? By far the most bad press I've heard

Re: [LU] Smith

2011-06-09 Thread Mark Humphries
E. -Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 09 June 2011 08:32 To: Mark Humphries Cc: Paul Cundell; Subject: Re: [LU] Smith Sent from my iPhone On 9 Jun 2011, at 08:09, "Mark Humphries" wrote: > So a pub landlord cannot know or impart

Re: [LU] Smith

2011-06-09 Thread Mark Humphries
So a pub landlord cannot know or impart the truth? 1. Would Lorimer know the real facts about the transfer? Yes, he was on the board at the time. 2. What reason is there for Lorimer to lie about this issue? None I can see. 3. Has Lorimer a track record of telling pointless fibs? Nope. What kind

Re: [LU] snoddy

2011-06-03 Thread Mark Humphries
Ooh, stop it.. -Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 03 June 2011 17:36 To: Mark Humphries Cc: Lee Jones; Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] snoddy Jesus! 'Let's be 'avin you' Sent from my iPhone On 3 Jun 2011, at 15:51, &quo

Re: [LU] snoddy

2011-06-03 Thread Mark Humphries
Yeah but a go on delia is a once in a lifetime opportunity. From: lee@gmail.com [mailto:lee@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Lee Jones Sent: 03 June 2011 14:49 To: Mark Humphries Cc: Matt Anderson; Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] snoddy Really? I think he's vital if we are to progress. Th

Re: [LU] snoddy

2011-06-03 Thread Mark Humphries
Id be tempted with £3.5 and a few add-ons, like a go on Delia with her cooking breakfast the next morning.. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt Anderson Sent: 03 June 2011 13:15 To: Leeds List Subject: [LU] snoddy £

Re: [LU] snoddy

2011-06-03 Thread Mark Humphries
Rivals would be unwilling to sell to us, plus you are assuming the proceeds would go to Grayson to replace him. My guess is he would replace via the loan market or a free transfer, and the money would just get swallowed up in the accounts. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc

Re: [LU] NonLU: Yorkshire renaissance

2011-05-31 Thread Mark Humphries
Pigeon Detectives have a new album out too. Sadly the Cribs don't have a new one out for a while yet. _ From: Richard Naef [mailto:rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk] To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:31:57 +0200 Subject: [LU] NonLU: Yorkshire renaissance what have they be

Re: [LU] nonlu: buying an apple.

2011-05-27 Thread Mark Humphries
Pop into the Admiral Nelson in soho.. I'm sure someone in there will be happy to sort you out. :-) -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard Naef Sent: 27 May 2011 11:57 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] nonlu: bu

Re: [LU] Johnson leaving

2011-05-26 Thread Mark Humphries
He is out of contract so we will get nothing? -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Brendan Osborne Sent: 26 May 2011 11:25 To: d.r.bren...@leeds.ac.uk; Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] Johnson leaving Stoke are rumoured to b

Re: [LU] Non-LU: Cold Cruel Winter

2011-05-25 Thread Mark Tuffey
Picking up The Broken Token from my local library in Greendale, Wisconsin tomorrow. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http

Re: [LU] Play-offs - result

2011-05-25 Thread Mark Humphries
I'm against them, unless they are changed and they include the bottom teams in the divisions above, like they were in the first year. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of David Brennan Sent: 25 May 2011 09:43 To: 'leedslis

Re: [LU] Ryan Giggs not Tetley's Bitter

2011-05-24 Thread Mark Tuffey
I was just thinking about Smithy...if for NO other reason but he'll play with some passion and firesomething sorely lacking last season. I felt we had no pitch leadership or drive. He must be surplus at Newcastle. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago

[LU] Johnson and Kilkenny gone?

2011-05-20 Thread Mark Smith
Have they definitely gone? Must have missed that. MOT, Mark -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Michael Benjamin. Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 3:07 AM To: Ian Murray Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU

[LU] Goal of the month

2011-05-19 Thread Mark Humphries
Time to put the famous Leeds vote to good use! http://www.lfe.org.uk/news/goal-of-the-month-april-2011 ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...

Re: [LU] What do people think of the play-offs?

2011-05-17 Thread Mark Tuffey
e the FA or League Cup finals. There has to be a Leeds joke in there somewhere Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http

Re: [LU] Take it or leave it

2011-05-10 Thread Kitching, Mark
eate chances, problem is that's probably a player that would cost >£3mill. I'd keep Beccio but rotate more between him, McCormack and Somma. Mark K. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard Walker Sen

Re: [LU] Very LU [ Sex maniacs]

2011-05-10 Thread Mark Humphries
Twister? Zooom? Lolly gobble choc bomb? -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Dr Michael Benjamin Sent: 10 May 2011 08:15 To: Chris Briggs Cc: LEEDSLIST Subject: Re: [LU] Very LU [ Sex maniacs] The lolly sticks are appli

Re: [LU] Ruthless but correct

2011-05-09 Thread Mark Tuffey
Paynter is absolute rubbish. Flog him to Gillingham. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk

Re: [LU] Ruthless but correct

2011-05-09 Thread Mark Tuffey
ld be wearing the 10 shirt for us next season. Killkenny...likewise, hopefully we can do better. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] Ruthless but correct

2011-05-09 Thread Mark Tuffey
I would like us to sign Lichaj Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo

Re: [LU] Only seven goals now

2011-05-07 Thread Mark Humphries
Oh well, the last day for a few months where football doesn't totally fuck me off! Hurrah.. ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

Re: [LU] Only seven goals now

2011-05-07 Thread Mark Humphries
Also, of course, to drag away the little bit of hope our players might have had just before kick off. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Michael Benjamin. Sent: 07 May 2011 12:55 To: LEEDSLIST Subject: [LU] Only sev

Re: [LU] Only seven goals now

2011-05-07 Thread Mark Humphries
And what better little adrenalin boost the decision would have given them before the last match of the season! I only hope they flag later. FA are a fucking disgrace. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Michael Benj

[LU] Non-LU: Blackadder pilot

2011-05-07 Thread Mark Humphries
7 May 2011 11:48 To: Mark Humphries Cc: LEEDSLIST Subject: Re: [LU] Non-LU: I'd not seen this before.. Me neither. Probably because I don't search 'the queens bodyguard' on YouTube. Quite funny though. Sent from my iPhone On 7 May 2011, at 11:11, "Mark Humphries" wrote

Re: [LU] Non-LU: I'd not seen this before..

2011-05-07 Thread Mark Humphries
I got the link from an Adam Ant forum I am on. I'm not sure what is worse ;-) -Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 07 May 2011 11:48 To: Mark Humphries Cc: LEEDSLIST Subject: Re: [LU] Non-LU: I'd not seen this before.. Me neither

[LU] Non-LU: I'd not seen this before..

2011-05-07 Thread Mark Humphries
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWFq-v7TKdQ ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)

Re: [LU] The best news for a while

2011-05-07 Thread Mark Humphries
As I said some weeks back, Lees and Kisnorbo would be my dream partnership at the moment. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Michael Benjamin. Sent: 07 May 2011 10:58 To: Lee Jones Cc: LEEDSLIST; Lee Jones Subject:

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-07 Thread Mark Humphries
I find compulsory voting an affront to freedom of speech. Or the freedom to not speak. If people don't know or don't care about an issue, then it is better they don't vote and their influence on a vote something people ARE bothered about is zero. Still 69% for a NO vote, on a higher than expecte

Re: [LU] FA verdict in case of QPR's Alejandro Faurlin delayed

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Humphries
A fine is of no consequence if they still get promoted to PL!! -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Matt Anderson Sent: 05 May 2011 21:02 To: 'Nicholas Armit'; 'Jeremy Adams'; 'Leeds List' Subject: Re: [LU] FA verdict in

Re: [LU] FA verdict in case of QPR's Alejandro Faurlin delayed

2011-05-05 Thread Mark Tuffey
...it certainly will NOT happen so why not be a dreamer for one more Saturday?! Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mai

Re: [LU] Non-LU: More farce than arse, really

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
My view is that we'd have the same disparity in a republic. How do US earnings compare? Or French? Or Cuban (government official vs prole)? -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: 04 May 2011 16:07 To: leedslis

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
The benefit of the retrospectoscope is that it's based on cold hard facts, not mystical powers. Like the assumption Major wouldn't have invested in public services with the economic boom just round the corner, no, he would have abolished the top rate tax band, or set up nurse/teacher/policeman sho

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
They may do, but has one ever blown up in someones face so dramatically? I mean, Gordy was the self styled economic genius of his generation, so he told us. But the thing that I really don't get is how so soon after this happened, Milliband is trying to now pretend we don't need "slash and burn"

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
Of course we would. Pity you couldn’t lend Tony and Gordon your crystal ball though, would have prevented the tories getting in again wouldn’t it. -Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 04 May 2011 15:55 To: Mark Humphries Cc: Robert Heath

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
52. -Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 04 May 2011 14:59 To: Mark Humphries Cc: Robert Heath; Richard Naef; Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen? OK mate. I'll defer to your supreme knowledge of macroeconomic affairs. All I'll say i

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
Would have been an interesting dogfight to watch from the fens though, a typhoon vs a bf109 -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of markbu...@aol.com Sent: 04 May 2011 13:55 To: t...@3leafieldvillas.co.uk; leedslist@gn.apc.or

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
otmail.com] Sent: 04 May 2011 14:00 To: Mark Humphries Cc: Robert Heath; Richard Naef; Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen? Maybe we can use the cake and pop tax revenue to fill this deficit you seem so concerned about? Or no, we have to offset that against the net loss to the economy of billio

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
Collecting the extra tax revenue from those idiot tourists (from UK and overseas) who came into town to watch the poncey horses and raf jet? And broadcasting rights? And extra sale of champers? And union flags? And cakes and pop for all the street parties? -Original Message- From: leeds

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
Last time Rob paid taxes I think the Lancaster/hurricane and spitfire were defending us :-) -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Tim Leslie Sent: 04 May 2011 11:12 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good

Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-04 Thread Mark Humphries
And Labour's plan to reduce the deficit wouldn't be called "slash and burn"? How different was their plan? But anyway, your analogy about lancing the boil fits very well with the structural deficit plans over 4, not 5 years. One could argue that Labours idea to delay the "slash and burn" by 1 yea

Re: [LU] [NON-LU] Boring Legal guff was Good omen?

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
But who else will polish the silver in this republican utopia.. duh! :-) -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Simon Austin Sent: 04 May 2011 00:48 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] [NON-LU] Boring Legal guff was

[LU] [Non LU] Good omen?

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
Cool, so you are all for the coalition in their attempts to reduce the structural deficit asap I take it? Just curious like -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Ian Murray Sent: 03 May 2011 22:52 To: Joe Skinner Cc: LEEDS

Re: [LU] F**k me we now have a 'new' owner

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
I bought a packet of crisps today, fortunately they have sales outlets that allow you to buy a packet without turning up at the factory. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Rick Duniec Sent: 03 May 2011 19:12 To: Sean Emm

[LU] NON LU- browsers

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Tuffey
Any personal preferences between Explorer, Safari, Chrome, Firefox and Opera? Running Windows 7. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and

Re: [LU] 10 points

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
I thought there might be a sniff because his form has dropped significantly recently, and cant think bpool wages would be much more than championship wages. As an aside, I wonder if we will try and sign Watt permanently in the summer – he’s never going to get a chance at Arse. From: markbu.

Re: [LU] 10 points

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
I think Johnson will stay. How about Charlie Adam from b'pool? Did Grayson sign him original I wonder.. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Adams Sent: 03 May 2011 15:09 To: Leeds List Subject: [LU] 10 points S

Re: [LU] Good omen?

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
anjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 03 May 2011 13:03 To: Mark Humphries Cc: ; Leeds list; LEEDSLIST Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen? Right, I rather imagine that this is becoming slightly boring for everyone (me included), but I have to respond to this email as it is pretty insulting. You suggest that the whole

Re: [LU] Good omen?

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
start with footballers or their ilk - but its all the same thing. They were lucky to be born with football skills, some kids are lucky to be born to a successful businessman in the family. That’s life, I just get on with mine! -Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur

Re: [LU] Non-LU: The monarchy, Aston Villa, life, the universe and everything

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
Really? You didn't think for a just a second how you would look in primrose? -Original Message- From: Dr. Michael Benjamin [mailto:beden...@gmail.com] Sent: 03 May 2011 11:06 To: Mark Humphries Cc: Brian; Subject: Re: [LU] Non-LU: The monarchy, Aston Villa, life, the univers

Re: [LU] Non-LU: The monarchy, Aston Villa, life, the universe and everything

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
n...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard Naef Sent: 03 May 2011 11:32 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Non-LU: The monarchy, Aston Villa, life, the universe and everything Mark offered; > > Whilst doing a quick google for some official facts and figures,

Re: [LU] Non-LU: The monarchy, Aston Villa, life, the universe and everything

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
Whilst doing a quick google for some official facts and figures, I came across this. I thought I would post it up here as it gives a pretty good summary of the finances, and the figures are what I remember seeing elsewhere. http://blog.cgpgrey.com/the-true-cost-of-the-royal-family/

Re: [LU] Good omen?

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
Have you? No? How can you say they DON’T attract tourists. And actually, people DO take surveys of visitors, and people DO come here because of the royal family. You DON’T pay for them to "swan around", they are a net income. Why do you believe they think they're better than everyone else?

Re: [LU] Non-LU: The monarchy, Aston Villa, life, the universe and everything

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Humphries
I just don't understand how we are taking it up the arse by having a monarchy? The one argument trotted out is that we have to pay for them, and that is the reason it was pointed out they are a net income for us, so it would cost more NOT to have them, unless we raze all the royal palaces and buil

Re: [LU] Non LU - Time to shut up!

2011-05-02 Thread Mark Stephenson
ement. Mark -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John Sykes Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 9:13 AM To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: [LU] Non LU - Time to shut up! As I said a couple of days ago, we all have our own views re the mon

Re: [LU] Good omen?

2011-05-01 Thread Mark Humphries
100% If you want a republic, there are countries you can go to.. -Original Message- From: Ian Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com] Sent: 01 May 2011 16:32 To: Mark Humphries Cc: Mark Stephenson; LEEDSLIST Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen? She has no say constitutionally? Sure about

Re: [LU] Good omen?

2011-05-01 Thread Mark Humphries
slist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Stephenson Sent: 30 April 2011 20:31 To: 'LEEDSLIST' Subject: Re: [LU] Good omen? Matt I think you'll find that that most of the tourists come to look at the old houses of the current royal family's dead relatives. If anyone thinks that t

Re: [LU] Good omen?

2011-05-01 Thread Mark Humphries
There's actually not that many on the civil list, but I agree - no one comes to this country to see Edward, unless its in It's a Knockout of course. From: John Lee [mailto:bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 30 April 2011 22:51 To: 'Eric B'; 'Steve Gillen'; Mark Hum

Re: [LU] Good omen?

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Stephenson
K be looking at introducing pharaohs and pyramids also. Mark -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Michael ALCOCK Sent: Sunday, 1 May 2011 4:28 AM To: m...@leeds-united.net Cc: leedslist; Simon Hart; e...@morrish.org Subject: Re:

Re: [LU] We won

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Humphries
al Message- From: m...@leeds-united.net [mailto:m...@leeds-united.net] Sent: 30 April 2011 15:56 To: Guy Bonello Cc: Mark Humphries; Leeds List Subject: Re: [LU] We won Big red herring. They won't give 1.5 times the punishment of admin for this. Ineligible player type deduction at most Sent

Re: [LU] Good omen?

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Humphries
"The old bag" was smiling yesterday, that was actually the best part of it for me - they all seemed genuinely happy. And as for republic vs royalty debate - we cant afford to have a republic even if we wanted one. The royal family bring a huge amount into our country, far more than they cost. Wh

Re: [LU] We won

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Humphries
Would you rather we talking about how shit Becchio is? ;-) -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of m...@leeds-united.net Sent: 30 April 2011 15:17 To: Leeds List Subject: [LU] We won Sorry to interrupt the AV debate. Sent

Re: [LU] non LU AV

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Humphries
08:24 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU AV On 30/04/2011 07:34, Mark Humphries wrote: > How can it NOT cost more, you count all the votes as you do now, and > then if no one gets> 50% you count some more votes? Mark have you ever been to an election count? Every vote

Re: [LU] non LU AV

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Humphries
er count more votes or recount some ballot papers) is just peripheral and I only raised it because YOU cried foul that the No vote highlighted this. -Original Message- From: Paul Cundell [mailto:p...@cundell.com] Sent: 30 April 2011 08:42 To: Mark Humphries Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject:

Re: [LU] non LU AV

2011-04-29 Thread Mark Humphries
ople understand what they are voting for. Either that or there should be a short test on policies on the ballot form, and if someone failed the test their vote wouldn't count! -Original Message- From: Paul Cundell [mailto:p...@cundell.com] Sent: 29 April 2011 08:38 To: Mark Humphries Cc: l

Re: [LU] non LU AV

2011-04-29 Thread Mark Humphries
you count all the votes as you do now, and then if no one gets > 50% you count some more votes? -Original Message- From: Paul Cundell [mailto:p...@cundell.com] Sent: 29 April 2011 08:38 To: Mark Humphries Cc: leedslist Subject: Re: [LU] non LU AV > > Here is my view on it all

Re: [LU] non LU AV

2011-04-29 Thread Mark Humphries
Bollox. Name 1 libdem who isn't for it. -Original Message- From: Paul Cundell [mailto:p...@cundell.com] Sent: 29 April 2011 08:38 To: Mark Humphries Cc: leedslist Subject: Re: [LU] non LU AV On 29 Apr 2011, at 08:12, "Mark Humphries" wrote: > The fact all libdems

Re: [LU] Fwd: Re: Good omen?

2011-04-29 Thread Mark Tuffey
arts over the rest of our offspring.. I also point to...Bush I leading to Bush II. Do you really think Dubya gained the presidency based on his own talent? So don't be too hard on the blue bloods. Cheer

Re: [LU] non LU AV

2011-04-29 Thread Mark Humphries
The fact all libdems are for it should tell you more. Here is my view on it all; 1. It is more complicated, therefore will be more expensive to administer. Government already costs too much. 2. "It is more representative as the winner would need > 50% of the vote". Total bollocks. Consider this

Re: [LU] KO Saturday

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Tuffey
by people everywhere. In all my years going to the footy pubs in Milwaukee I've NEVER, EVER met another Leeds Utd supporter. Cheers Mark El Presidente Wisconsin Whites Leeds United Chicago Fire ___ Leedsl

Re: [LU] KO Saturday

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Humphries
You do yourself no favours Rich. How many goals have other players scored when Becchio was NOT playing, vs when he was? You have not played against him and seem to be a bit "shallow" when assessing his qualities - one of which has been pointed out MANY times to you - that he makes himself a nuisa

Re: [LU] KO Saturday

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Humphries
I have high hopes for Lees - and I hope Kisnorbo gets back and is the same player as before and we can get him contracted. With those 2 as regulars I think the central defence would be good enough. As for the rest of the squad - I think we are generally good enough actually, we need a few "upgra

Re: [LU] KO Saturday

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Humphries
But then look at the career history of most of the squads in the championship, loanees apart. Most have "average" players. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of barbaravi...@gmail.com Sent: 28 April 2011 11:22 To: leedsl

Re: [LU] KO Saturday

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Humphries
Actually what we have a problem with is loan defenders coming in and doing great, then as soon as they are signed up they start playing average. From: Matt Anderson [mailto:m...@leeds-united.net] Sent: 28 April 2011 10:10 To: 'David Bromley'; 'Mark Humphries'; &

Re: [LU] KO Saturday

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Humphries
The question for psychologists-on-the-list is, what is better - the disappointment of missing the playoffs, or the devastation of losing in the playoffs? I still think I would rather have us miss out on the playoffs - gives a clear message to Grayson and Bates that the team needs improvement, not

Re: [LU] Fw: before you all kill yourselves.

2011-04-26 Thread Mark Humphries
He could re-call Lees for the final game too, now Bury are promoted -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard Naef Sent: 26 April 2011 18:07 To: 'Leeds List' Subject: Re: [LU] Fw: before you all kill yourselves. > Well

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >