Fair enough Richard. ah those bubbles.. what they can do to a man .-)
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Richard Naef <
rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> wrote:
> >are you guys still bothering with richard?? its your own fault then.
>
>
> yes, yes I know Eric, but it's like one of those "bad" relat
nted to see him go and those that
are quite excited to see another striker come in.
From: David Nattan
To: leeds list
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013, 16:44
Subject: Re: [LU] Becchio - the players' player ?
F*ck Becchio he has gone and, as far as I
that
are quite excited to see another striker come in.
From: David Nattan
To: leeds list
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013, 16:44
Subject: Re: [LU] Becchio - the players' player ?
F*ck Becchio he has gone and, as far as I am concerned is the past.
Le
d and good servant for the club - and we'll see if. yet
> again, if you are wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Richard Walker [mailto:richleed...@yahoo.co.uk]
> Sent: 31 January 2013 16:09
> To: Richard Naef; 'leeds list'
> Subject: Re: [LU] Becchio - the players' play
d Walker [mailto:richleed...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 31 January 2013 16:09
To: Richard Naef; 'leeds list'
Subject: Re: [LU] Becchio - the players' player ?
Why didn't you say. 'Rich, your so wrong, Becchio has been a quality
goalscorer for us for five years and will immediately show
he isn't so why bet against each other ?
From: Richard Naef
To: 'leeds list'
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013, 15:36
Subject: Re: [LU] Becchio - the players' player ?
Ok Rich, here's a bet for you.
I will bet you £20 that Becchio does not score 10 or
>
>Ok Rich, here's a bet for you.
>I will bet you £20 that Becchio does not score 10 or more league goals
>for Norwich. That's in his whole Norwich career.
>done diddly done, just to confirm if he scores 0-9 while in a Norwich
>shirt in any league match you win, 10 or more I win. Th
Ok Rich, here's a bet for you.
I will bet you £20 that Becchio does not score 10 or more league goals for
Norwich. That's in his whole Norwich career.
done diddly done, just to confirm if he scores 0-9 while in a Norwich shirt
in any league match you win, 10 or more I win. The figure
I suppose I should have added in the PL , however seeing as I didn't I'll keep
it as it is and hope they don't get relegated.
From: Richard Walker
To: Richard Naef ; 'leeds list'
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013, 11:57
Subjec
Nope - it's got to be with the fence sitter (Rich N)
From: Peter Castlehouse
To: 'Richard Walker' ; 'Richard Naef'
; 'leeds list'
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013, 11:59
Subject: RE: [LU] Becchio - the players&#
Hey, I'll take that bet!
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Walker
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013 10:57 PM
To: Richard Naef; 'leeds list'
Subject: Re: [LU] Becchio - the players' player ?
O
Ok Rich, here's a bet for you.
I will bet you £20 that Becchio does not score 10 or more league goals for
Norwich. That's in his whole Norwich career.
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedsl
>are you guys still bothering with richard?? its your own fault then.
yes, yes I know Eric, but it's like one of those "bad" relationships, you
just can't leave it alone - and all this recent talk of Hot Tubs and Veuve
Cliquot - well, what can a poor boy do
_
>Exactly. Lose the hoof target.
YES! lets leave the hooves for Tesco value burgers!
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
PETE CA
>I'd like to review your predictions and give an assessment of how many you
get right but it actually turns out you haven't got a view on >most things
you just sit on the fence and point out when other people are wrong. Nowt
wrong with that I suppose but this is football and >its all about opinions
st, he's going
> to fail big time. - you check that prediction Rich in a few months. I look
> forward to your assessment.
>
>
> ________________
> From: Richard Naef
> To: 'leeds list'
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 January 2013, 23:31
> Subject: Re: [LU] Becchio - the players&#
r
side without him. Good luck to him but let's be honest, he's going to fail big
time. - you check that prediction Rich in a few months. I look forward to your
assessment.
From: Richard Naef
To: 'leeds list'
Sent: Wednesday, 30 Januar
He's an average striker, lousy control and a great grafter. I cannot see
how, with his lousy ball control,he can ever do anything in the PL. He is
not Johnson who improved every season. Becchio has not upped his game. He
scores when given the chance & he gets them in the CL because of the level
of
are you guys still bothering with richard?? its your own fault then.
cheers,
Eric
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Richard Naef <
rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> wrote:
> > They're odds on for relegation this season
>
> Rich, have you ever been right about anything in your whole life?
>
> You
> They're odds on for relegation this season
Rich, have you ever been right about anything in your whole life?
You've spent years saying he's the "worst ever player for Leeds", losing
money on bets and being proved wrong, saying he'll only score penalties,
then he gets 4 or 5 more after that, say
Happy to just leave it at that.
Richard Walker wrote:
I think we're going round in circles - he is shit and we will see how things
pan out.
On 30 Jan 2013, at 21:56, Phill Shields wrote:
> Yeah Colin was clearly planning to dump him. That's why he offered him a new
> contract and to make hi
I think we're going round in circles - he is shit and we will see how things
pan out.
On 30 Jan 2013, at 21:56, Phill Shields wrote:
> Yeah Colin was clearly planning to dump him. That's why he offered him a new
> contract and to make him our highest paid player.
>
> All 3 managers picked him
Yeah Colin was clearly planning to dump him. That's why he offered him a new
contract and to make him our highest paid player.
All 3 managers picked him regularly. Your argument about his goal scoring is
because he has played so many games.
Richard Walker wrote:
Another thing Dave. I don't mo
Another thing Dave. I don't modern day footballers give a toss about anything
other than money. Lets face it, why would you sign for Norwich? They're odds on
for relegation this season so LB would find himself back in League 1 soon.
I'm still not convinced he'll go.
On 30 Jan 2013, at 21:14, D
M... I think Mcallister signed him and gave him a chance.
Grayson had Beckford and allowed Becchio to play second fiddle for a while. I
think he struggled with him after that dropping him regularly.
Colin inherited him and his reputation. Despite all Colin's geeing up comments
on his arriva
I very much doubt it - but if I had 3 of his ex team mates in my current
team I would certainly ask their opinion and take (some) note of it
If you were a player at Norwich and had played for Leeds with Becchio would
you just go ahead and let the manager to sign him or tell him what you
thought o
Dave, you've watched Becchio play - if you were a PL manager would u sign him.
On 30 Jan 2013, at 17:57, David Nattan wrote:
> Something that has just struck me about Becchio to Norwich is that fact
> that Howson, Snoddy and Johnson are already there. Presumably therefore the
> manager has aske
He is in our top 10 goalscorers ever and is lethal from a yard. If they need a
player like that then why not. If they need someone to trap the ball control it
and pick out a 30 yard pin point pass then not.
Anyone watching the sh1te that is the African cup of nations and seeing some of
those p
Something that has just struck me about Becchio to Norwich is that fact
that Howson, Snoddy and Johnson are already there. Presumably therefore the
manager has asked these 3 about Becchio and his strengths / weaknesses etc
If any (or certainly if more than one) of them had similar views to Rich W
a
29 matches
Mail list logo
