inson, Mick"
; Ian Murray
Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org"
Sent: Tuesday, 26 September 2017, 14:46
Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket
Kill ???
On Tuesday, 26 September 2017, 12:58:51 BST, Ian Murray
wrote:
Can someone can this guy? Betty?
Sent from my Samsu
rg
Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket
As an Essex fan. I'm enjoying our Leicester like triumph.
Hoping to be at Chelmsford tomorrow to see us polish off the Yorkies and
complete an unbeaten season.
Matt
> On 26 Sep 2017, at 11:09, Robinson, Mick wrote:
>
> No, but it wo
Obviously the Essex Lad who messed up the Dizzy Pens at half time
-Original Message-
From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Ian
Murray
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 12:59
To: Matt; Robinson, Mick
Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket
Can someone can this guy? Betty?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Original message
From: Matt
Date: 26/09/2017 19:54 (GMT+08:00)
To: "Robinson, Mick"
Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket
As an Essex fan. I'm enjoying our Leicest
y if you remember Midd & Yorkshire contrived a result in the last
> game of the season last year to deny Somerset the title.
>
>
> From: Jim Moran [mailto:j...@jimmoran.co.uk]
> Sent: 26 September 2017 11:07
> To: Robinson, Mick
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re
.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket
[EXTERNAL]
That would have not been very Cricket would it?
On 26 September 2017 at 11:04, Robinson, Mick
mailto:mick.robin...@miq.com>> wrote:
No, Somerset needed to win, and get an extra bowling point, which, had Midd
declared, they would not have go
om:* Jim Moran [mailto:j...@jimmoran.co.uk]
> *Sent:* 26 September 2017 10:55
> *To:* Robinson, Mick
> *Cc:* leedslist@gn.apc.org
> *Subject:* Re: [LU] Non LU: Cricket
>
>
>
> *[EXTERNAL]*
>
> Wouldn't Somerset put them back in again to follow on and then win the
&g
No, Somerset needed to win, and get an extra bowling point, which, had Midd
declared, they would not have got.
Miid in right trouble now @ 25-5
From: Jim Moran [mailto:j...@jimmoran.co.uk]
Sent: 26 September 2017 10:55
To: Robinson, Mick
Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] Non LU
They're 22/5 now, so I bet they wish they had...
On 26 September 2017 at 10:54, Jim Moran wrote:
> Wouldn't Somerset put them back in again to follow on and then win the
> game?
>
> On 26 September 2017 at 10:41, Robinson, Mick
> wrote:
>
> > Just following the cricket, very happy Yorkshire are
Wouldn't Somerset put them back in again to follow on and then win the game?
On 26 September 2017 at 10:41, Robinson, Mick wrote:
> Just following the cricket, very happy Yorkshire are safe.
>
> However, If Middlesex declare now at 18-3 they save themselves from
> relegation, dare they do that??
Just following the cricket, very happy Yorkshire are safe.
However, If Middlesex declare now at 18-3 they save themselves from relegation,
dare they do that???
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/lee
I think so, some good batting to come, 250 would be a good score, and it’s
still raining down the road.
From: John Boocock [mailto:j...@boocock.net]
Sent: 16 May 2017 15:58
To: Robinson, Mick ; Leeds List
Subject: RE: [LU] Non LU Cricket
76 for 1 in 14 overs and a run rate of 5.15 is bearable
al Message-
From: Leedslist [mailto:[1]leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf
Of John Boocock
Sent: 16 May [2]2017 15:03
To: [3]leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: [LU] Non LU Cricket
Well we are underway at 3pm with 45 overseas agreed. Anyone else
here?
Betty
Listening in online ☹
Good news is Derby off for rain again.
I will take a washout down there with a Tykes win
-Original Message-
From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of John Boocock
Sent: 16 May 2017 15:03
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: [LU] Non LU
Well we are underway at 3pm with 45 overseas agreed. Anyone else here?
Betty
Sent from the North
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.
Murray [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 15 July 2013 12:39
> To: David Brennan
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up
>
> I love cricket. It's a different game to football - pretty incomparable
> really mate.
>
>
gt; From: Richard walker
>> To: Robert Heath
>> Cc: leeds list
>> Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up
>>
>> Who watched it though ? Not many beer gardens with big screens.
>
> Well a quick squint at Google tells me Sky had nearly 2 million view
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:58:06 +0100
> From: Richard walker
> To: Robert Heath
> Cc: leeds list
> Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU - cricket - Ashes 1 up
>
> Who watched it though ? Not many beer gardens with big sc
Good point. I found a really good stream and watched it on my computer, but
sitting on a hard chair in front of a small screen for 5 days was not that
much fun.
On 14 July 2013 22:58, Richard walker wrote:
> Who watched it though ? Not many beer gardens with big screens.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
Who watched it though ? Not many beer gardens with big screens.
Sent from my iPad
On 14 Jul 2013, at 19:12, Robert Heath wrote:
> What a fantastic match! Test cricket,eh?
>
> I'll be @ lord's on thursday for the next installment. Can't wait!
>
>
> On 14 July 2013 16:35, nat...@sky.com wrote
What a fantastic match! Test cricket,eh?
I'll be @ lord's on thursday for the next installment. Can't wait!
On 14 July 2013 16:35, nat...@sky.com wrote:
> What an amazing end to a pretty amazing test match
> I did not think he touched it even with hotspot etc but now I have seen
> snicko I am
What an amazing end to a pretty amazing test match
I did not think he touched it even with hotspot etc but now I have seen snicko
I am convinced
Plus Haddin did look behind straightaway which is a bit of a giveaway for a
batsman - cheating Aussie should have walked !
Once again Lancastrian Jimmy
.
From: "markbu...@aol.com"
To: Jim Moran
Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org"
Sent: Wednesday, 10 July 2013, 10:40
Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to
Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)
dunno, looks like a cracking game, what
t;>> And I didn't listen to the blog, honest!
>> >>>
>> >>> Mark
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>> This is the correct answer (or at least the one they gave) do not not
>> >>>>> if there are any othe
to the blog, honest!
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> This is the correct answer (or at least the one they gave) do not
> not if there are any others which would work<<
> >>>
> >>>
> >&g
t;>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>>> This is the correct answer (or at least the one they gave) do not not if
>>>>> there are any others which would work<<
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
his is the correct answer (or at least the one they gave) do not not if
>>>> there are any others which would work<<
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> From: "markbu...@aol.com"
>> To: "nat...@sky.co
ave
>
>
>
> From: "markbu...@aol.com"
> To: "nat...@sky.com"
> Cc: leeds list
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59
> Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to
> Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)
>
>
> Ok, he
can't be fucked working it out but I think it lies here:
Five penalty runs are awarded to the fielding side if the batting team:
Attempt to "steal" a run or deliberately run short
Deliberately waste time after having been warned
Damage the protected area of the pitch after two warnings.
Dr Micha
Do you really mean the last 2 batsmen, ie there is no one left to come in?
If not, then it would work this way:
1st guy hits 1st ball for 6. Then skies the next one and is caught but the
batsmen cross. Then 2nd bloke hits the last ball for 6.
But I am guessing that isn't going to do it, b/c the q
any others which would work<<
Dave
From: "markbu...@aol.com"
To: "nat...@sky.com"
Cc: leeds list
Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59
Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to
Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)
Ok, here goes...
First batsm
:22
Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to
Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)
Batsman (1) hits a six of the first ball - this takes him to 100, then the
same batsman hits a single taking him to 101 in the process the batsmen
cross and the scores are now tied, batsm
at least the one they gave) do not not if there
> are any others which would work
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> From: "markbu...@aol.com"
> To: "nat...@sky.com"
> Cc: leeds list
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59
> Subje
To: Ian Murray
Cc: leeds list
Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 16:26
Subject: Re: [LU] NON - LU - cricket quiz question (ignore if you listen to
Andy Salzman Ashes podcast)
wouldn't work, read the question. "last two batsmen". Run out would end the
match
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Ju
This is the correct answer (or at least the one they gave) do not not if there
are any others which would work
Dave
From: "markbu...@aol.com"
To: "nat...@sky.com"
Cc: leeds list
Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 15:59
Subject: Re: [LU] NON
I was doing balls separated by a comma - Hit a six, next ball is run out,
next ball is a six. But Mark's right, I didn't read it properly and notice
the last two batsmen thing.
Ed.
On 9 July 2013 16:27, Ian Murray wrote:
> You can't be run out off a 6 anyway, surely?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
You can't be run out off a 6 anyway, surely?
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/07/2013, at 23:26, markbu...@aol.com wrote:
> wouldn't work, read the question. "last two batsmen". Run out would end the
> match
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 9 Jul 2013, at 17:17, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>> How can you be
I didn't hear Zaltzman's show, but surely 6, run out (but cross over), 6?
Ed.
On 9 Jul 2013, at 15:35, "nat...@sky.com" wrote:
> Last 2 batsmen are both on 94 in a one day game
> They need 7 to win and there are 3 balls left
> How can they both get a century ?
>
> Like I say it has come from
wouldn't work, read the question. "last two batsmen". Run out would end the
match
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Jul 2013, at 17:17, Ian Murray wrote:
> How can you be run out off a 6?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 09/07/2013, at 23:13, "Ed Morrish" wrote:
>
>> I didn't hear Zaltzman's show, bu
How can you be run out off a 6?
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/07/2013, at 23:13, "Ed Morrish" wrote:
> I didn't hear Zaltzman's show, but surely 6, run out (but cross over), 6?
>
> Ed.
>
> On 9 Jul 2013, at 15:35, "nat...@sky.com" wrote:
>
>> Last 2 batsmen are both on 94 in a one day game
>>
Or couldn't you do it in two balls? First batsmen runs seven, one of which is
called short. Batsman two hits a 6 off the next ball?
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/07/2013, at 23:00, markbu...@aol.com wrote:
> Ok, here goes...
>
> First batsman hits a four off the first ball.
> He then hits three of
Ok, here goes...
First batsman hits a four off the first ball.
He then hits three off the second ball but the umpire rules the second run was
short. So he gets his century but the batsmen have changed ends and still need
one to win.
Second batsman hits a six off the last ball to win the match an
Last 2 batsmen are both on 94 in a one day game
They need 7 to win and there are 3 balls left
How can they both get a century ?
Like I say it has come from Andy Saltzman Ashes podcast so no kudos if you get
the answer from there)
Makes a change from camel and car quiz questions
Dave
___
I could never take Boycott seriously as a Yorkshireman when he said was a Man
Utd fan in a radio interview once.
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:46:04 +0100
> From: david.nat...@btinternet.com
> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - cricket
>
> I can't see
What a debut innings from the lad from Yorkshire - Johnny Bairstow 41 off 21
balls when the pressure was really on and it looked like we may lose, as good a
debut as you will ever see in the circumstances.
Dave of LEEDS UNITED !!!
___
Leedslist mailing
6 PM
To: list leedslist
Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - cricket
I can't see anything wrong with it - We ARE champions and Yorkshire ARE
relegated.
As for the how can you support Leeds United and Lancashire - to me it is only
the same as our overseas fans who support LUFC and their own countr
ikewise manager and coaching staff and as for the owners
Dave
--- On Fri, 16/9/11, Richard Walker wrote:
From: Richard Walker
Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - cricket
To: "DAVID NATTAN"
Cc: "list leedslist"
Date: Friday, 16 September, 2011, 18:26
Dave, there's somethin
Dave, there's something really not right about your post below
Sent from my iPad
On 15 Sep 2011, at 17:10, DAVID NATTAN wrote:
> Lancashire la la la - champions, champions, championsOr at least we will be
> in the next few minutes
> Oh and don't forget the Yorkshire sheep botherers - going d
> > Lancashire la la la ? - champions, champions, championsOr at least we
> > will be in the next few minutes
> > Oh and don't forget the Yorkshire sheep botherers - going down, going
> > down, going down.
> > Get in there !!!
>
> I simply don't understand how you can be a Leeds United supporter,
just to clarify...
Quite right David _Brennan_.
Shame on you David Nattan.
BobD
Leeds/Yorkshire/England
From: Robert Dufton
To: David Brennan ; "leedslist@gn.apc.org"
Sent: Friday, 16 September, 2011 11:53:08
Subject: Re: [LU] non LU - crick
Quite bloody right! Couldn't agree more Dave.
Geoff Boycott take note.
BobD
From: David Brennan
To: "leedslist@gn.apc.org"
Sent: Friday, 16 September, 2011 11:34:00
Subject: [LU] non LU - cricket
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 201
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:10:36 +0100 (BST)
> From: DAVID NATTAN
> To: list leedslist
> Subject: [LU] non LU - cricket
>
> Lancashire la la la ? - champions, champions, championsOr at least we
> will be in the next few minutes
> Oh and don't forg
Fck off you tw@t.
:-)
Sent from my iPhone
On 15 Sep 2011, at 17:10, DAVID NATTAN wrote:
> Lancashire la la la - champions, champions, championsOr at least we will be
> in the next few minutes
> Oh and don't forget the Yorkshire sheep botherers - going down, going down,
> going down.
> Get
Lancashire la la la - champions, champions, championsOr at least we will be
in the next few minutes
Oh and don't forget the Yorkshire sheep botherers - going down, going down,
going down.
Get in there !!!
Dave
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and opti
Would any of the English players get on the Irish team?
--
From: "McWilliams, Brendan,VF-Group (bmcwill)"
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 5:19 PM
To:
Subject: [LU] Non LU: CRICKET!!!
From the BBC online:
Nicholas Green, TMS in
OH YES!!!
Verner
tHe LiTtLe YeLlOw DaFfOdIl @}-,-'--
--- On Wed, 2/3/11, McWilliams, Brendan, VF-Group (bmcwill)
wrote:
From: McWilliams, Brendan, VF-Group (bmcwill)
Subject: [LU] Non LU: CRICKET!!!
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Date: Wednesday, 2 March, 2011, 17:19
>From the BB
>From the BBC online:
Nicholas Green, TMS inbox: "Does this mean Ireland will be now
commandeering England's best players for their all conquering side?"
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.g
Nicked off the scum fans who sing "Giggs will tear you apart"
- Original Message
From: "markbu...@aol.com"
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Tue, 4 January, 2011 13:12:56
Subject: Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant
Swann will tear you apart
>>what do the arm
Swann will tear you apart
>>what do the army sing to the tune of Love will tear us apart by Joy
Division? Or is it just Love will tear us apart?<<
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo
what do the army sing to the tune of Love will tear us apart by Joy Division?
Or is it just Love will tear us apart?
--- On Tue, 28/12/10, Damian Walsh wrote:
From: Damian Walsh
Subject: [LU] non LU cricket chant
To: "leedslist"
Date: Tuesday, 28 December, 2010, 23:40
Listen
"Mitchell Johnson is even worse than Bradley"?
_
From: Damian Walsh [mailto:pussaydam...@gmail.com]
To: leedslist [mailto:leedsl...@gn.apc.org]
Sent: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:40:31 +0100
Subject: [LU] non LU cricket chant
Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the r
'He bowls to the left, he bowls to the right but Mitchell Johnson's bowling is
shite
On 28 Dec 2010, at 23:40, Damian Walsh wrote:
> Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the "uncomplimentary
> chant about Johnson". Anyone know what it is?
>
> Damian
> _
Thanks - Damian
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
MARCHING ON TOGETHER
Cost fewer than Berbatov it is. :)
(I know)
On 28 December 2010 23:50, Ed Morrish wrote:
> That's awful. It should be *fewer*.
>
> Ed.
>
> On 28 Dec 2010 23:49, "Jim Moran" wrote:
>> Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Johnson. Cost less than Berbatov and takes
>> less wickets.
>>
>> On 28 December 2010
That's awful. It should be *fewer*.
Ed.
On 28 Dec 2010 23:49, "Jim Moran" wrote:
> Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Johnson. Cost less than Berbatov and takes
> less wickets.
>
> On 28 December 2010 23:40, Damian Walsh wrote:
>> Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the "uncomplimentary
He bowls down the left
He bowls down the right
That boy Mitchell Johnson
His bowling is shite.
Ed.
On 28 Dec 2010 23:40, "Damian Walsh" wrote:
> Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the "uncomplimentary
> chant about Johnson". Anyone know what it is?
>
> Damian
> __
Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Johnson. Cost less than Berbatov and takes
less wickets.
On 28 December 2010 23:40, Damian Walsh wrote:
> Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the "uncomplimentary
> chant about Johnson". Anyone know what it is?
>
> Damian
> __
Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the "uncomplimentary
chant about Johnson". Anyone know what it is?
Damian
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email
Bollox
Queenslanders mate - Australias answer to Spaniards - live in a lovely place,
just dumb as dogshyte
Sent from my iPhone
On 30/11/2010, at 5:46 PM, Eric B wrote:
> its cause cricket is a dying sport. thank god for that :-)
>
> Eric
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:39 PM, John Boocock wro
On 02/12/2010 03:20, Eric Barlier wrote:
the stadiums look empty to me
Eric, you should have gone to Specsavers :-)
Sell outs on the first three days but after that just under half of the
Gabba's 47,000 capacity Well Aussies have never been keen on watching
their boys get beaten – so these
ng On DownUnder
>
> -Original Message-
> From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
> Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Tuesday, 30 November 2010 7:34 PM
> To: Eric B
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; John Boocock
> Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU Cr
ginal Message---
From: Jeff Newton
Date: 30/11/2010 16:04:47
To: 'Matt'; Eric B
Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; John Boocock
Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU Cricket
Try telling that to the thousands of expats who will turn up for the third
test in Perth leading one nil in the series
Marchi
:34 PM
To: Eric B
Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; John Boocock
Subject: Re: [LU] NON LU Cricket
Try telling the Indians that.
Anyway the few Aussies who did turn up were more interested in playing with
beachballs than watching their team get slayed to all parts.
They only want to watch a winning
Try telling the Indians that.
Anyway the few Aussies who did turn up were more interested in playing with
beachballs than watching their team get slayed to all parts.
They only want to watch a winning team.
Matt
On 30 Nov 2010, at 17:46, Eric B wrote:
> its cause cricket is a dying spor
its cause cricket is a dying sport. thank god for that :-)
Eric
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:39 PM, John Boocock wrote:
> re: the lack of Aussie supporters at The Gabba. 'Day Five must be fancy
> dress day. The Aussies have all come as empty seats.'
>
> Betty
> (off to bed soon)
>
re: the lack of Aussie supporters at The Gabba. 'Day Five must be fancy
dress day. The Aussies have all come as empty seats.'
Betty
(off to bed soon)
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leeds
Does anyone else think that the real scandal in the cricket world is the
sanctimonious way these Pakistan players have been hung out to dry?
a) I don't see that they did that much wrong. Who were the victims of this
terrible crime? A load of parasitical bookies who are reeling in the cash by
ex
77 matches
Mail list logo
