>>Boxes bring in sod all money compared to the 1 fans we've lost.
£3 a season for each one, for 10 people.
_http://www.leedsunitedvenue.com/index.php?id=57_
(http://www.leedsunitedvenue.com/index.php?id=57)
50 ST holders paying £600 a season bring in the same revenue in tickets
Well said that man.
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Sep 2012, at 20:15, "Jim Moran" wrote:
> Boxes bring in sod all money compared to the 1 fans we've lost.
>
> £3 a season for each one, for 10 people.
> http://www.leedsunitedvenue.com/index.php?id=57
>
> 50 ST holders paying £600 a season
Boxes bring in sod all money compared to the 1 fans we've lost.
£3 a season for each one, for 10 people.
http://www.leedsunitedvenue.com/index.php?id=57
50 ST holders paying £600 a season bring in the same revenue in tickets
alone without the free 3 course meal and all the extras.
On 14
"markbu...@aol.com"
> To: ni...@mindbrix.co.uk; dwalms...@netmonkeys.co.uk
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 1:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Spending on players
>
>
> Goodness me, common sense on the list!
>
> The numbers
gt;
>
> From: "markbu...@aol.com"
> To: ni...@mindbrix.co.uk; dwalms...@netmonkeys.co.uk
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 1:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Spending on players
>
>
> Goodness me, co
.@aol.com"
To: ni...@mindbrix.co.uk; dwalms...@netmonkeys.co.uk
Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] Spending on players
Goodness me, common sense on the list!
The numbers seem to add up, given the constraints of having Bates in
c
ubject: Re: [LU] Spending on players
Goodness me, common sense on the list!
The numbers seem to add up, given the constraints of having Bates in
charge. 50% of t/o on player wages, yet only 3% return. LUST proposes upping
spending to 60% - which would push us into losses.
Not seeing any practic
Goodness me, common sense on the list!
The numbers seem to add up, given the constraints of having Bates in
charge. 50% of t/o on player wages, yet only 3% return. LUST proposes upping
spending to 60% - which would push us into losses.
Not seeing any practical ways to improve things here. I
at sort of progress is worth "a cautious approach to
spending."
Cheers!
Sean
-Original Message-
From: dave walmsley
To: 'leedslist@gn.apc.org'
Sent: Fri, Sep 14, 2012 7:00 am
Subject: [LU] Spending on players
One of the problems with the LUST statement abou
That's the irony. Thrift is in every Leeds fan's blood, but they want their
club to behave in direct opposition to their own instincts -- and this is
despite us still suffering from the legacy of the last chairman who did
exactly that.
Nigel.
On 14 September 2012 11:58, dave walmsley wrote:
>
One of the problems with the LUST statement about spending more on the team, is
that it is easier said than done. It's not like a manufacturing company buying
new machinery to increase productivity.
If I owned the club, (I wish!), I would spend very conservatively on the team,
hoping that I ha
11 matches
Mail list logo
