Hello All,
Another 2 cents worth here, I am part of this BETA group,
non-LDS.
I think you'll like what you see when it's released, VERY
easy to navigate through, which is a desire we all want.
Right now in the early stages, not much for UK records,
but US records are a real gem.
The Roman calendar went from March 1st month through
February 12th month. That is why September is 7,
October is 8, etc. so it is accurate. In the American
colonies at the time, they used the month number, as
above. The Romans didn't renumber the months, Pope
Gregory and the protestant rulers did,
Jackie,
Thank you, but that site just appears to be someone's opinion.
It assumes that because the "year" began in March, that the
month numbering must have done so as well.
Please see what I wrote in response to Cathy.
Peter.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EM
Hi Cathy
I did say that I was aware of double dating and the phrases "Old
Style" and "New Style" ...
But I do not see why given that ALL calendars that were printed/
written from that period always start with January and proceed
to December. They do NOT start with March and go to February.
Furthe
This is not true at all. None of it.
Peter.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RICHARD
> SCHULTHIES
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 7:40 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] "Old Style" MONTHS???
>
>
>
Sounds Good Dave, BUT when the Julian Calendar was
established, the start of the year was 1 January and all
those months that are (and were) based on the Latin
name for the number were two out, as they had been for
several centuries before that.
The fact that the Latin prefix names agree with your
Peter Haughton wrote:
Sounds Good Dave, BUT when the Julian Calendar was
established, the start of the year was 1 January and all
those months that are (and were) based on the Latin
name for the number were two out, as they had been for
several centuries before that.
The fact that the Latin pref
This British Tax year still runs from 5th April each year. This is from the
25th March the legal New Year to which have been added the "lost days" from
the changeover in calendars. There would have been problems in changing the
Governmental year, so it wasn't changed, it still occurs.
John Clare
I agree with Ron entirely - I've never seen it otherwise in England.
However, it would be useful if a possibility existed to present a
sentence as Title; First Name; Surname; nee Maiden Name, also Adopted
Name - I was adopted by my stepfather and real mother so that we all
had the same surnam
Joseph.
You need an uptodate version of OOo (I think 2.2 or later) which contains Base.
To open in Open Office, firstly create a copy of your .fdb file and change it
manually to .mdb; you will get a warning about changing file names but ignore
this.
Right click on the quickstart icon and se
Peter Haughton wrote:
Sounds Good Dave, BUT when the Julian Calendar was
established, the start of the year was 1 January and all
those months that are (and were) based on the Latin
name for the number were two out, as they had been for
several centuries before that.
Taken from the Quaker websi
I have had to deal with the Quaker issue. The oldest Quaker settlement in
the US is right here in Georgia (Wrightsborough). The Quakers of
Wrightsborough left behind excellent records. They followed the old month
system well after 1752.
michele
- Original Message -
From: "Gene You
I'm glad someone pointed out the difference in methods of showing the maiden
name between the US and the UK. I am now especially aware of this
difference. This is great.
Elizabeth,
In your case, there may be a way to get partway there today by doing two
things. First, insert your adopted name in
Is it possible to generate a list of all Places of Death? If so, how?
Thanks,
Barbara
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.Lega
Barbara,
Whilst it is possible to find who died/was buried in specific locations I don't
think it is possible to search for all locations where these events happened.
I haven't looked but I think it should be possible using Access/Open Office.
Ron Ferguson
___
DITTO! Thanks from Margaret Bell.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:53 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] about New.FamilySearch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) may have started this
dialog
into new.familysearch.org. That
Name field. The name of a person has several parts - first, middle, last,
suffix. Various sources only have parts of the name. In the detail source,
I list the parts of the name that this particular source is showing.
Example:
Richard Thornton Perdue Seniorsource detail: first
Peter Haughton stated :-
I did say that I was aware of double dating and the phrases "Old
Style" and "New Style" ...
But I do not see why given that ALL calendars that were printed/
written from that period always start with January and proceed
to December. They do NOT start with March and go to
I checked help, but didn't get a full answer:
Statistics: This box shows you how many individuals, families and
sources are currently in your family file.
On the Home Page tab, it says I have 299 Sources. But when I did a
large book, that branch of the family had about 950 sources cited. So
are th
Thanks to all who commented.
Cathy, Dundas, Ontario
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To uns
Try this:
Go to Search>>Find (or just press CTRL-F).
Set the following:
Look for whom? = Individual
Where to look? = Death Place
How to look? = Not Equal To
What to look for? = "" (Nothing)
(I.e., you are looking for all individuals that do not have "Nothing"
for a death place. [Hope that made
Robert,
This would find Individuals that have a Death Place, not a list of
those locations.
Like Ron, I don't think it can be done in Legacy.
The closest would be to export people with a death place to a new
file and do a location report but that would be messy picking out the
death places.
Hi Susan,
Yes, it's the number of Master Sources.
Cathy
At 04:32 AM 23/01/2008, you wrote:
I checked help, but didn't get a full answer:
Statistics: This box shows you how many individuals, families and
sources are currently in your family file.
On the Home Page tab, it says I have 299 Sourc
... I have placed it as a source in Legacy for
his date of death, with a note in my research tab
about the situation.
It was oral family history that prompted me to go looking to see
if the boy WAS actually buried there. Now that I have confirmed that
he indeed COULD still be roaming Alask
24 matches
Mail list logo
